02-23-2016, 08:31 AM
|
#801
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by strange brew
i don't think wideman is going anywhere. I ma not sure flames are really willing to retain salary and i don't even know if that gets it done. Still think he has more trade value next year and team should be patient.
|
+1
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:31 AM
|
#802
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Agree that Backlund is a valuable piece that could be used on a top 6 winger and allow Bennett to shift fully to centre
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:44 AM
|
#803
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I like Backlund but I don't think he's part of the "core" and I think his value is the best it's been and will be. He's playing on the second line and I think he's really only a third line guy, not to say he isn't doing well but I'd prefer for Bennett to step in and do better. I think Backlund would get us a pretty decent return as well, I don't know if it makes much sense shopping him now though. I could see him as part of the Hamonic deal in the summer with the Islanders...or to the habs for Galchen...I'm not going to even try right now.
Everyone wants to keep Backlund but most don't think he's a core piece and if you want to get something good you have to give something good.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:46 AM
|
#804
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Menace
Weise sounds like the classic Bryan Bickell - Lance Bouma type guy who has one strong season, and gets a big contract that he doesn't come close to living up to.
I'd stay away.
|
No way! He's the Dutch Gretzky!
http://www.habseyesontheprize.com/20...ruins-playoffs
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:46 AM
|
#805
|
Franchise Player
|
I've said it before and I'll say it again: we'll start to miss Backlund the moment he's traded.
No other player on the team can do what he does. He's the perfect 3rd line centre who can also slot anywhere in the top 6 and be productive while being defensively responsible.
He's on a good deal. We need to bolster our forwards group, not weaken it.
|
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
Anduril,
anyonebutedmonton,
BigBCalgary,
Calgary4LIfe,
Captain Hair,
devo22,
Flames Draft Watcher,
flamesfan1297,
flamesforcup,
FLAMESRULE,
Mattman,
Max Cow Disease,
Mightyfire89,
prizefighterinferno,
Split98,
SportsJunky,
Stillman16,
The Big Chill,
topfiverecords,
united
|
02-23-2016, 08:47 AM
|
#806
|
Franchise Player
|
At some point, you don't maximize value on a guy like Backlund. You keep him and utilize him as a 3rd line center that is a defensive stalwart, and who also chips in with adequate defence.
I love Jankowski and I really think Arnold is due for a look up in the NHL, but you don't sell on Backlund because you have some guys in the pipe who MAY be ready to enter the NHL. I really love Jankowski, but I am positive that there is no way he can enter the league next year and replace Backlund in the lineup.
I don't think Backlund is a core piece. However, I do think that at times, you just have to identify players that you win with, and players that are expendable. Backlund is a guy you win with moving forward, or until there is a guy like Jankowski or Arnold who is actually pushing him out due to actually outplaying him in the NHL.
I have a feeling that even though Backlund is having a really good year, he is one of those guys that are a lot more valuable to their team than on the trade market.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:51 AM
|
#807
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I agree and disagree. Backlund is good and we'd miss what he brings to the lineup but having him in the top 6 is one of the reasons the team is where it is. Like you said, this team needs to bolster our forwards, our biggest need is in the top 6 and Backlund isn't a good top 6 player, he's a good bottom 6 player. We need to get someone who can score goals and put up points, sure Backlund does that but not well enough to be a legit top 6 guy. I agree that he's a perfect 3rd liner but like I said, we need to give up something to get something. If trading him makes a small hole on the third line (I think he can be replaced and the difference wouldn't be too bad) but fills a bigger hole in the top 6 then it's a win.
The team clearly isn't good enough, changes have to be made and as good as Backlund is and as much as he's liked by fans and teammates, I just don't think he fits here long term.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:52 AM
|
#808
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
I've said it before and I'll say it again: we'll start to miss Backlund the moment he's traded.
No other player on the team can do what he does. He's the perfect 3rd line centre who can also slot anywhere in the top 6 and be productive while being defensively responsible.
He's on a good deal. We need to bolster our forwards group, not weaken it.
|
Keeping a third line centre instead of trading him as part of a package to obtain a top six forward/winger as most are suggesting, isn't bolstering your forward group. It's weakening it.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:56 AM
|
#809
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murph
Keeping a third line centre instead of trading him as part of a package to obtain a top six forward/winger as most are suggesting, isn't bolstering your forward group. It's weakening it.
|
What genuine top 6 forward is Backlund going to land? Galchenyuk?
I think C4L put it nicely. Backlund is a player that will have more value to his team on the ice than in the trade market. He's quiet, but extremely effective.
At the same time, I don't see him having huge trade value. Now, if he was just a piece involved for a trade for a young RWer like Toffoli, it's a different story. Nevertheless, I don't see that happening.
Backlund also isn't a 3rd line centre right now. By almost every metric he's a top 6 forward. He plays every tough matchup on the team. No other centre on this team can do that. I'd like Monahan and Bennett to step up soon, but they are young. Backlund allows them to develop without throwing them to the wolves.
Last edited by Ashasx; 02-23-2016 at 08:58 AM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:58 AM
|
#810
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
What genuine top 6 forward is Backlund going to land? Galchenyuk?
I think C4L put it nicely. Backlund is a player that will have more value to his team on the ice than in the trade market. He's quiet, but extremely effective.
At the same time, I don't see him having huge trade value. Now, if he was just a piece involved for a trade for a young RWer like Toffoli, it's a different story. Nevertheless, I don't see that happening.
|
As I said, Backlund would be part of a package to obtain a top six forward. I'm not suggesting he brings back one on his own.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 08:59 AM
|
#811
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Good read from Haynes (as always) on the Flames search for goaltending.
http://www.flamesfrom80feet.ca/2016/...an-part-2.html …
On this list I'd really be happy with 1 of Hutchinson, Hellberg, Raanta, Andersen, Forsberg. And I think we get one of them. Jack Campbell's finding his groove again and might be a player to take a flyer on as well.
|
There are lots of options in terms of trade. No goalie is really established except for Anderson and Kemp. I wonder if Management cheats out and goes with a Ramo/Ortio tandem next year. Ramo is only 29 and Ortio is only 24, so we know Ortio could still improve and we know Ramo is capable of being a light-starter on his best days.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:00 AM
|
#812
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
4th period claiming:
Penguins, Sharks, Islanders, Kings interested in Hudler
Stars, Wings, Capitals, Kings interested in Russell
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:01 AM
|
#813
|
Franchise Player
|
Depending on the return I wouldn't cry over Backlund being dealt. We have plenty of bottom six centers that could be called up and play the 4th line role while Stajan moves up to play third line. Plus, it's not like we have anything to lose by having Arnold or Shore or whoever show what they have to offer. If you have an opportunity to move Backlund and can improve the team long term, you make the deal. Backlund and Morrison for Drouin would make me move Backlund without any worries.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:01 AM
|
#814
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
What genuine top 6 forward is Backlund going to land? Galchenyuk?
I think C4L put it nicely. Backlund is a player that will have more value to his team on the ice than in the trade market. He's quiet, but extremely effective.
At the same time, I don't see him having huge trade value. Now, if he was just a piece involved for a trade for a young RWer like Toffoli, it's a different story. Nevertheless, I don't see that happening.
Backlund also isn't a 3rd line centre right now. By almost every metric he's a top 6 forward. He plays every tough matchup on the team. No other centre on this team can do that. I'd like Monahan and Bennett to step up soon, but they are young. Backlund allows them to develop without throwing them to the wolves.
|
Backlund is a top six forward on a team that will pick in the top 5 come draft time. I like Backlund as much as the next guy, but if he's in your top 6 forward group, you're not winning anything.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:01 AM
|
#815
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
I agree and disagree. Backlund is good and we'd miss what he brings to the lineup but having him in the top 6 is one of the reasons the team is where it is. Like you said, this team needs to bolster our forwards, our biggest need is in the top 6 and Backlund isn't a good top 6 player, he's a good bottom 6 player. We need to get someone who can score goals and put up points, sure Backlund does that but not well enough to be a legit top 6 guy. I agree that he's a perfect 3rd liner but like I said, we need to give up something to get something. If trading him makes a small hole on the third line (I think he can be replaced and the difference wouldn't be too bad) but fills a bigger hole in the top 6 then it's a win.
The team clearly isn't good enough, changes have to be made and as good as Backlund is and as much as he's liked by fans and teammates, I just don't think he fits here long term.
|
Very arguable. Backlund has the most points of any forward not on the top line, comparable counting stats to a guy like Kesler (and is also younger and on a substantially better contract), the best plus/minus on the team outside of Brodie, and our best possession forward (ahead of Frolik and Gaudreau).
Dude is far from the reason why the team finds itself where it is. In no particular order, more legitimate reasons why Calgary "is where it is":
Goaltending
Special teams
Kanye West
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to prizefighterinferno For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:07 AM
|
#816
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
4th period claiming:
Penguins, Sharks, Islanders, Kings interested in Hudler
Stars, Wings, Capitals, Kings interested in Russell
|
Possible trade going down today or tomorrow while being in the L.A. area?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
|
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:09 AM
|
#817
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I didn't mean that he's the reason, this team needs another real top 6 player. Backlund isn't that kind of player but he's in the top 6 and he shouldn't be. To be used properly, he should be on the third line for the most part. He's a third line player on the second line and we have a second line player on our first line. Sure this team has depth, but it's in the wrong areas. The Flames have a lot of bottom 6 players and you don't win the game with a 3 lines of bottom 6 players.
Backlund is good. I like what he brings and I'm sure most do. Maybe a team is willing to give up a top 6 forward for Backlund + something. Getting a real top 6 forward would help this team a lot, sure there would be a bit of a hole in the bottom 6 but this team has enough players and prospects to make that hole less glaring then the current one we have in the top 6.
He'd help the special teams Kanye
He's not as good as he seems Kanye
He plays top 6 Kanye
He's not the fix Kanye
Sorry...I had to.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#818
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murph
Backlund is a top six forward on a team that will pick in the top 5 come draft time. I like Backlund as much as the next guy, but if he's in your top 6 forward group, you're not winning anything.
|
And our line of X-Backlund-Frolik isn't the reason why.
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:17 AM
|
#819
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
I didn't mean that he's the reason, this team needs another real top 6 player. Backlund isn't that kind of player but he's in the top 6 and he shouldn't be. To be used properly, he should be on the third line for the most part. He's a third line player on the second line and we have a second line player on our first line. Sure this team has depth, but it's in the wrong areas. The Flames have a lot of bottom 6 players and you don't win the game with a 3 lines of bottom 6 players.
Backlund is good. I like what he brings and I'm sure most do. Maybe a team is willing to give up a top 6 forward for Backlund + something. Getting a real top 6 forward would help this team a lot, sure there would be a bit of a hole in the bottom 6 but this team has enough players and prospects to make that hole less glaring then the current one we have in the top 6.
He'd help the special teams Kanye
He's not as good as he seems Kanye
He plays top 6 Kanye
He's not the fix Kanye
Sorry...I had to.
|
Sorry, who is that?
|
|
|
02-23-2016, 09:20 AM
|
#820
|
Franchise Player
|
The Score running with:
Quote:
theScore NHL @theScoreNHL 9m9 minutes ago
Report: Rangers' Yandle no longer available on trade market http://thesco.re/1mVafVy
|
Gilbert off the market. Yandle off the market. Polak already moved.
Treliving hopefully gets to maximize Russell's value.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 AM.
|
|