06-19-2018, 04:30 PM
|
#5621
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
I can...
It's our money, I think King is angling to make some backroom deal that will be foisted on the citizenry as a fait accompli.
What difference does that make? It's still them asking the city to subsidize their customers transportation costs and subsidizing their security costs. Why should they get breaks on either of those?
|
Do you demand to be inside the room for all other city negotiations? Deals would never get done. There is a point at which stuff can be made public, but not during early negotiations.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2018, 04:34 PM
|
#5622
|
Lives In Fear Of Labelling
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
I can...
It's our money, I think King is angling to make some backroom deal that will be foisted on the citizenry as a fait accompli.
|
Both sides will still have their best interests at heart, so unless you don't trust the city to negotiate a fair deal, the only difference is the negotiation isn't played out in the court of public opinion. So you'd only get to bitch about it after the deal is done.
|
|
|
06-19-2018, 04:36 PM
|
#5623
|
First Line Centre
|
Doing it in private is a great idea, but there seems to be this great forgetting from king's side that the flames are the ones who launched the public campaign. It backfired tremendously.
|
|
|
The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
|
Art Vandelay,
automaton 3,
Benched,
CliffFletcher,
D as in David,
deejay829,
FLAMESRULE,
Funkhouser,
getbak,
handgroen,
I_H8_Crawford,
Joborule,
Johnny Makarov,
mrkajz44,
Plett25,
powderjunkie,
Red Slinger,
RedHotC,
Roughneck,
Rubicant,
Stochansky,
Table 5,
Textcritic,
theJuice,
TopChed,
vennegoor of hesselink
|
06-19-2018, 04:57 PM
|
#5624
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major
Doing it in private is a great idea, but there seems to be this great forgetting from king's side that the flames are the ones who launched the public campaign. It backfired tremendously.
|
This. It was the Flames who went to the media to make it a political issue. Too funny that King is now saying they want to negotiate privately. Maybe the Flames got some polling figures showing how badly their hearts and minds campaign backfired.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
06-19-2018, 05:04 PM
|
#5625
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Do you demand to be inside the room for all other city negotiations? Deals would never get done. There is a point at which stuff can be made public, but not during early negotiations.
|
King wants no media until the deal is done... I 100% think that citizens should be engaged and consulted prior to any agreement. I think shutting citizens out is 100% a deal breaker here or at least it should be.
|
|
|
06-19-2018, 05:17 PM
|
#5626
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
King wants no media until the deal is done... I 100% think that citizens should be engaged and consulted prior to any agreement. I think shutting citizens out is 100% a deal breaker here or at least it should be.
|
Is that what he wants?
Or does he want no media until the city negotiators and the Flames have hammered out an agreement that is acceptable to both sides and ready for public engagement before a council vote finalizes it?
|
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
442scotty,
8sPOT,
Enoch Root,
GioforPM,
Guitar Shop Gary,
IamNotKenKing,
Jay Random,
Manhattanboy,
N-E-B,
redforever,
Red_Baron,
socalwingfan,
Zevo
|
06-19-2018, 05:20 PM
|
#5627
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major
Doing it in private is a great idea, but there seems to be this great forgetting from king's side that the flames are the ones who launched the public campaign. It backfired tremendously.
|
Like a guy fixing cars out of his garage, the Flames thought they could get away with only telling half the story, but the city called them out on it. Now they’re complaining that negotiations weren’t kept private. How do you reason with people like that?
__________________
The Delhi police have announced the formation of a crack team dedicated to nabbing the elusive 'Monkey Man' and offered a reward for his -- or its -- capture.
|
|
|
06-19-2018, 05:20 PM
|
#5628
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
This. It was the Flames who went to the media to make it a political issue. Too funny that King is now saying they want to negotiate privately. Maybe the Flames got some polling figures showing how badly their hearts and minds campaign backfired.
|
we elect our Councillors to act in the best interests of their citizens.
i have no issues with the negotiations starting in private, as ultimately, the deal (if their is one) will be taken to the public before anything is actually signed...and everyone should be on the same side finally
IMO there's not going to be some back room deal a la some banana republic; there's way too much scrutiny on the issue for its to be in a black box until after the ink is dry on a deal... whatever the deal is, the public will have its chance to comment and speak out on it before anything gets signed
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2018, 06:01 PM
|
#5629
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
we elect our Councillors to act in the best interests of their citizens.
i have no issues with the negotiations starting in private, as ultimately, the deal (if their is one) will be taken to the public before anything is actually signed...and everyone should be on the same side finally
IMO there's not going to be some back room deal a la some banana republic; there's way too much scrutiny on the issue for its to be in a black box until after the ink is dry on a deal... whatever the deal is, the public will have its chance to comment and speak out on it before anything gets signed
|
Much like the Olympic bid, keep things private until the point where the public engagement is warranted. No need for public engagement when Harry and Sally have a disagreement about who's buying lunch this week. It's childish and makes both sides look petty as much as both KK and NN think they're right. It's funny that they both have Alliteration names. Maybe it's a character trait.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Reneeee For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2018, 06:08 PM
|
#5630
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reneeee
It's childish and makes both sides look petty as much as both KK and NN think they're right. It's funny that they both have Alliteration names. Maybe it's a character trait.
|
That reminds me of the anagram I accidentally discovered on election night last fall...
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
|
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2018, 06:09 PM
|
#5631
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major
Doing it in private is a great idea, but there seems to be this great forgetting from king's side that the flames are the ones who launched the public campaign. It backfired tremendously.
|
Just want to quote this one more time.
|
|
|
06-19-2018, 07:19 PM
|
#5632
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major
Doing it in private is a great idea, but there seems to be this great forgetting from king's side that the flames are the ones who launched the public campaign. It backfired tremendously.
|
Yeah. The irony is pretty thick here.
At this point though, there's no reason for either side to negotiate publically. So this is just lip service.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2018, 07:56 AM
|
#5633
|
Franchise Player
|
The Flames still get to say things like threaten moving, and have Bettman come around every once and awhile to donkey it up though, right? Fair is fair!
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 08:22 AM
|
#5634
|
Franchise Player
|
Just a reminder that while I love to dump on KK as much as everyone (surprised he's still employed), Flames only took the arena discussions public because Nenshi used the new arena in a campaign video about the Victoria Park plan, implying the arena was going there or agreed to.
Now....after they went public, completely agree they totally botched the PR and public relations and shot themselves in the foot roughly 100 times and managed to make the entire city hate them.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2018, 08:32 AM
|
#5635
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Just a reminder that while I love to dump on KK as much as everyone (surprised he's still employed), Flames only took the arena discussions public because Nenshi used the new arena in a campaign video about the Victoria Park plan, implying the arena was going there or agreed to.
Now....after they went public, completely agree they totally botched the PR and public relations and shot themselves in the foot roughly 100 times and managed to make the entire city hate them.
|
I believe posters are referring to the Flames going public with the CalgaryNEXT proposal first.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2018, 08:33 AM
|
#5636
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Just a reminder that while I love to dump on KK as much as everyone (surprised he's still employed), Flames only took the arena discussions public because Nenshi used the new arena in a campaign video about the Victoria Park plan, implying the arena was going there or agreed to.
Now....after they went public, completely agree they totally botched the PR and public relations and shot themselves in the foot roughly 100 times and managed to make the entire city hate them.
|
What about CNext? Flames launched that idea publicly without really engaging city stakeholders first (and whatever engagement they did do received understandably tepid response).
At every step of the process the Flames have been the first to screw up, screwed up bigger, while trying to screw the taxpayer.
I acknowledge that the city is not without its own missteps, but it seems most people's biggest complaint is that they are making too much information public...
Last edited by powderjunkie; 06-20-2018 at 08:53 AM.
Reason: lol: sureloss'd even here
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 08:36 AM
|
#5637
|
Franchise Player
|
Oh, ya - I was referring to going public with the whole election debacle last year.
CNext was a whole other level of terrible. Again, amazed the entire executive at CSEC is still around after all of this. They had one job and massacred it beautifully.
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 08:49 AM
|
#5638
|
Franchise Player
|
I got the impression that the CalgaryNext launch was due to the fact things were moving at such a slow pace behind the scenes. There were rumbling for more than a few years. In an attempt to bring the dialogue forward and spur things along, it became a complete poop show. CalgaryNext was always the hailmary and it just got nasty from there when the city review came in double of what the Flames projected. Both parties were playing the numbers game.
All of that just carried over when the discussion in Victoria park started. The discussions at that point were probably akin to a divorce negotiation that continued to sour as things went along.
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 08:49 AM
|
#5639
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
we elect our Councillors to act in the best interests of their citizens.
i have no issues with the negotiations starting in private, as ultimately, the deal (if their is one) will be taken to the public before anything is actually signed...and everyone should be on the same side finally
IMO there's not going to be some back room deal a la some banana republic; there's way too much scrutiny on the issue for its to be in a black box until after the ink is dry on a deal... whatever the deal is, the public will have its chance to comment and speak out on it before anything gets signed
|
Our wonderful councillors already killed a document from being public about some of their bad behaviour so I have no confidence that they will act in the best interest of the public when working on this deal.
|
|
|
06-20-2018, 09:04 AM
|
#5640
|
First Line Centre
|
Is there anyway we can fly Trump and Trudeau in for these closed door negotiations so we can have 4 idiots @ the table fighting for power.
I'd love to see some CCTV of said meeting.
Trump hugging the US flag
King drooling all over himself in anger
Nenshi's sarcastic eye rolls he constantly throws like daggers
Pierre jr yammering about tariffs on US made hockey sticks.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 AM.
|
|