Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 01-12-2022, 09:56 AM   #1
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default Pronman ranks top U-23 players

https://theathletic.com/3060357/2022...r-jack-hughes/

Flames not coming out so good here.

Highest flame: Dustin Wolf at 50
66. Coronato; calls out mediocre production this season on deep harvard team.
95. Adam Ruzicka; poor skating but average elsewhere
99. Pelletier; seems like his production is not impressive enough? Pronman thinks his puck skills are below average
108. Zary; below average skating again
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 10:05 AM   #2
looooob
Franchise Player
 
looooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
https://theathletic.com/3060357/2022...r-jack-hughes/

Flames not coming out so good here.

Highest flame: Dustin Wolf at 50
66. Coronato; calls out mediocre production this season on deep harvard team.
95. Adam Ruzicka; poor skating but average elsewhere
99. Pelletier; seems like his production is not impressive enough? Pronman thinks his puck skills are below average
108. Zary; below average skating again
interesting- not sure what to make of this- with no recent high picks or impact U23s on the roster its maybe not that surprising that we don't have any in the top 25-30, but I suppose a half full person might observe that 5 in top 108 is not bad in the depth /2nd tier department?
looooob is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to looooob For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 10:26 AM   #3
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

12 points in 12 games as a freshman doesn't seem like mediocre production. I don't really have any context for understanding numbers in college hockey though. Maybe that is middling.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 10:36 AM   #4
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

PPG for a freshman is usually pretty good...not sure how it's considered middling.

Here are the U-20 Freshman (1st year) scoring leaders in the NCAA:

1) Josh Doan: 25 points, 1.0 PPG
2) Matthew Knies: 20 points, 1.0 PPG
3) Carter Mazur: 18 points, 1.0 PPG
4) Matthew Coronato: 12 points, 1.0 PPG
5) Chaz Lucius: 12 points, 0.86 PPG

So yeah Pronmon is a bit out to lunch in calling it middling performance. The biggest issue here is that Harvard has only played 12 games, so he's just not playing enough hockey.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 10:38 AM   #5
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

When you look back at Pronman’s similar lists over time, how have they aged?
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 10:38 AM   #6
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob View Post
interesting- not sure what to make of this- with no recent high picks or impact U23s on the roster its maybe not that surprising that we don't have any in the top 25-30, but I suppose a half full person might observe that 5 in top 108 is not bad in the depth /2nd tier department?
Yup.

With equal distribution you'd expect to have 3 players in the top 96, so having 5 in the top 108 actually is pretty good overall.

And we haven't drafted top 10 in the last 5 drafts...so probably shouldn't expect to have any of the top 20-30 just based on that alone.

Also Pronman tends to have his own bias and if he's not a fan of a guy from their draft year it can be hard for them to climb up the charts. Honestly I'm not sure there is a way to justify Ruzicka being higher than Pelletier, when Pelletier has been an immediate play driver in the AHL at 20. Where it took Ruzicka some time to become a strong AHLer.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 01-12-2022 at 10:59 AM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 10:41 AM   #7
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob View Post
interesting- not sure what to make of this- with no recent high picks or impact U23s on the roster its maybe not that surprising that we don't have any in the top 25-30, but I suppose a half full person might observe that 5 in top 108 is not bad in the depth /2nd tier department?
Agreed, not terrible I suppose, and Wolf is one of the top ranked Goalies (2nd I think, behind Wallstedt).

I was hoping Pelletier's AHL production would boost him up the rankings, but if we take Pronman as somewhat indicative of what other teams scouting departments think of our U-23 crop, it would explain why we are not getting a huge amount of excitement with trade offers.

I wonder where Valimaki would rank if he was a bit younger.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 10:53 AM   #8
genetic_phreek
First Line Centre
 
genetic_phreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: VanCity
Exp:
Default

Interesting that he says Ruzicka has poor skating. His mechanics aren't smooth but he moves pretty swift for a big man.
genetic_phreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 11:01 AM   #9
RedHawk12
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
PPG for a freshman is usually pretty good...not sure how it's considered middling.

Here are the U-20 Freshman (1st year) scoring leaders in the NCAA:

1) Josh Doan: 25 points, 1.0 PPG
2) Matthew Knies: 20 points, 1.0 PPG
3) Carter Mazur: 18 points, 1.0 PPG
4) Matthew Coronato: 12 points, 1.0 PPG
5) Chaz Lucius: 12 points, 0.86 PPG

So yeah Pronmon is a bit out to lunch in calling it middling performance. The biggest issue here is that Harvard has only played 12 games, so he's just not playing enough hockey.
To be honest, I don't really see Doan, Knies or Mazur as more than maybe 3rd liners at most in the NHL so it's probably not good that Coronato has comparable stats.

But I also think it's a case by case thing. I recall Johnny was also PPG as a freshman and then really exploded in year 2. Maybe we just gotta hope Coronato follows a similar trajectory.
RedHawk12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 11:03 AM   #10
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
When you look back at Pronman’s similar lists over time, how have they aged?
I haven't done a thorough review but it is about what you would expect. Some right some wrong. I will say this much for Pronman, when he is wrong he is up front about it. He was super high on Bouchard and Broberg, but backed off after their first pro year, calling out their skating.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 11:08 AM   #11
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
When you look back at Pronman’s similar lists over time, how have they aged?
Like he pulled names from a hat to determine order.

Guy has always had some "I just know better" picks that he will double and triple down on over time as he is proven wrong.

Up until like a year and a half ago, he was adamant Casey Middlestadt was going to be the best player in his draft class... As every player around him was very obviously better.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 11:10 AM   #12
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Why does anyone pay attention to this clown?

If he actually knew anything he would at least have been hired by an NHL team at one point in any capacity.

He hasn’t because he knows nothing more than any other fan. I almost snorted when he commented on Pelletier’s puck skills. Huh?

He also uses the caveat of “I rank based on STAR potential” as a back door excuse to cover his nonsense.

In 2018 he rated the Flames prospects 29th

That list include a top 5 of…
1. Kylington
2. Valimaki
3. Mangiapane
4. Andersson
5. Dube

Uhhhhh… ok.

That looks like nowhere near 29th in hindsight.

He classified all 5 as “legit NHL prospects” while labelling the Yamamoto & Bouchard as “very good NHL prospects.”

Ok!

https://theathletic.com/433940/2018/...shared_article
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Boreal For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 11:12 AM   #13
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
When you look back at Pronman’s similar lists over time, how have they aged?
I haven't done that, but Pronman does have a type. He likes very skilled players.

And hey - he's got Corranto ahead of Cole Caufield (79)

He had Pelletier at 174 in September - so he's jumped a lot.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 11:16 AM   #14
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHawk12 View Post
To be honest, I don't really see Doan, Knies or Mazur as more than maybe 3rd liners at most in the NHL so it's probably not good that Coronato has comparable stats.

But I also think it's a case by case thing. I recall Johnny was also PPG as a freshman and then really exploded in year 2. Maybe we just gotta hope Coronato follows a similar trajectory.
It's 100% a case by case thing. But the thing is more that PPG is generally good for a 1st year NCAA player, so to call it middling is just false.

Look at other 1st round forwards to come out of the NCAA recently that played their draft+1 season in the NCAA.

Mittelstadt: 30 points in 34 games
Norris: 23 points in 37 games
Wahlstrom: 19 points in 36 games
Farabee: 36 points in 37 games
Turcotte: 26 points in 29 games
Zegras: 36 points in 33 games
Boldy: 26 points in 34 games
Caufield: 36 points in 36 games
Holloway: 35 points in 23 games (2nd NCAA season, had 17 points in 35 games year 1)
Brisson: 21 points in 24 games

PPG for a 1st round pick playing their first year in the NCAA is pretty much the top end of expected production.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 11:16 AM   #15
Naitix
Scoring Winger
 
Naitix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Exp:
Default

Super biased ranking based on draft position, Byfield should not be anywhere near 21st, he's been trash ever since he was drafted - in the AHL and at WJC
Naitix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Naitix For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 11:24 AM   #16
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naitix View Post
Super biased ranking based on draft position, Byfield should not be anywhere near 21st, he's been trash ever since he was drafted - in the AHL and at WJC
Byfield, a very young player to be drafted in 2020, had 20 points in the AHL as an 18 year old and 1 point in 6 games in the NHL. This year in the AHL he has only played 8 games.

Your take is wrong, or at least isn't taking into consideration his age/where he played/how COVID has disrupted Jr./AHL hockey. To say he's been trash is just...a trash take.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2022, 11:56 AM   #17
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

It's also a projection of future value, not a matter of who's the best today. Otherwise Heiskanen would probably be #1. Frankly he should still be top 5.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 12:02 PM   #18
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Pronman is either just a tougher grader toward the Flames or hasn't watched enough of the the Flames prospects to appreciate guys like pelletier (who is full marks for his season) and consistently ranks their prospects below where they probably should be.

About as meaningful of that top 100 nhl skaters list that didn't include Johnny in the 100 or honorable mentions.

Nothing to see here.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 12:05 PM   #19
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Is Wolf ranked higher than Cossa?
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2022, 12:10 PM   #20
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
Is Wolf ranked higher than Cossa?
Yes. He has Cossa down in the 120's.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021