Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2008, 02:42 PM   #1961
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

http://blog.cleveland.com/sports/200...f_collusi.html

Incidently, the Titans were a late six-point favorite heading into the game. The final score, of course, was Titans 16, Colts 10.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 02:46 PM   #1962
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

If the Colts did tell the Titans to go ahead and take a knee. That is collusion. But with 20 seconds left playing second stringers. Would the colts have come back to win the game? I can't believe Collins is stupid enough to blab about it on the radio.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 07:39 PM   #1963
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Don't know if this is FATA but I didn't notice it:

Report: Dolphins renew Williams' contract

Quote:
The Miami Dolphins have reportedly renewed the contact of troubled running back Ricky Williams for 2008.
http://tsn.ca/nfl/news_story/?ID=226391&hubname=nfl

Whats up with that?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 10:02 PM   #1964
corporatejay
Franchise Player
 
corporatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Talked about it on primetime sports.


They basically said there is no risk in doing this, if they find someone better or he doesn't work out, they'll just cut him anyway. Miami has a lack of good players, Ricky has the potential to be a good player again, why cut a guy until you know your situation (like if they decide to draft mcfadden).
__________________
corporatejay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 10:50 PM   #1965
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
Talked about it on primetime sports.


They basically said there is no risk in doing this, if they find someone better or he doesn't work out, they'll just cut him anyway. Miami has a lack of good players, Ricky has the potential to be a good player again, why cut a guy until you know your situation (like if they decide to draft mcfadden).

I always forget football is like this. Very weird CBA agreement to have in such a violent sport.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 12:52 AM   #1966
corporatejay
Franchise Player
 
corporatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT View Post
I always forget football is like this. Very weird CBA agreement to have in such a violent sport.
Well contracts are HEAVY in signing bonuses and guaranteed money. Also, I'm guessing insurance policies for NFL contracts are fairly common place.

Here's an interesting quote from jerome bettis.


Quote:
I wasn't faking that I had an injury. I was just faking that the injury happened on that short-yardage play. I had to fool the coaches and the team's medical department into thinking the injury had occurred on that play. Otherwise, the Steelers would have had their reason to cut me and my salary.
__________________
corporatejay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 01:10 PM   #1967
Sainters7
Franchise Player
 
Sainters7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
Exp:
Default

I keep hearing on the radio the past few weeks how the Jags could knock off the Patriots if they met in the playoffs. I just don't buy it. From what I've seen in the regular season, the way to beat the Jags is to spread out their D and look deep often. The Colts used this strategy in their first meeting and it worked extremely well. The Saints basically copied the Colts gameplan when they played the Jags two weeks later and put up 41 points on Jax, with Brees throwing for 445 yards and 3 TD's. With Brady and Moss on the roster, the Patriots have the right weapons to expose the Jags secondary just as well as Brees and Manning did. And as long as the weather stays decent at Foxboro(its been above freezing all week), I don't see how the Pats won't win this game.

IMO the only team who has any shot at knocking off New England is the Colts(though I'd still take the Pats in that match-up)
Sainters7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 01:19 PM   #1968
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Well, the other side of the coin is the Jags are a ball possession team. If they can grind the ball, dominate time of possession and minimize the number of possessions the Pats get, then they may have a chance.

Even then, the Jags are going to need to be efficient on offense and hope for a couple defensive plays.

So I think the Jags have a good shot, but the Pats are still favoured.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 09:29 PM   #1969
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

49ers hire Mike Martz as their new OC

This should be interesting....
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 12:03 PM   #1970
Lurch
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Mike Martz coaching an offense with little to no talent at WR combined with a poor (to this point in his career) QB makes very little sense to me.
Lurch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 12:20 PM   #1971
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Martz doesn't need talent at WR. whoever is playing there will succeed in his schemes. Furrey and Macdonald haven't exactly lit the world on fire in other schemes but with Martz both put up big catch totals.

Kitna is a mediocre QB but he put up big numbers with Martz as well.

The offensive problems with the Lions had a lot to do with the O-Line and no running game. The passing game with marginal guys was actually pretty good.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 01:12 PM   #1972
JD
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Not Abu Dhabi
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Martz doesn't need talent at WR. whoever is playing there will succeed in his schemes. Furrey and Macdonald haven't exactly lit the world on fire in other schemes but with Martz both put up big catch totals.

Kitna is a mediocre QB but he put up big numbers with Martz as well.

The offensive problems with the Lions had a lot to do with the O-Line and no running game. The passing game with marginal guys was actually pretty good.
It was OK, a little mismanaged at times. Maybe prolific at other times.

Deep passes to Shaun MacDonald while he was double-covered always frustrated me. Why a team with Roy Williams and Calvin Johnson commonly used MacDonald as a deep threat boggled my mind.

Martz took a lot of heat for not using the running game enough, but having watched most of Detroit's games, I really can't blame him in many cases. The running game was either completely ineffective or the team was down early and needed to rely on their strengths (passing game) to get back into games. Only a couple games did Bell, Jones, or Duckett get anything going at all.

Anyway, I was glad to see Martz move on. I fully admit his schemes are effective and there is a place for them in the league, but they are contrary to the head coach's philosophy of fundamental, smash-mouth football. The Lions need to build an offensive line and play physical football to gain any foundation of a winner.
JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 02:06 PM   #1973
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD View Post
It was OK, a little mismanaged at times. Maybe prolific at other times.

Deep passes to Shaun MacDonald while he was double-covered always frustrated me. Why a team with Roy Williams and Calvin Johnson commonly used MacDonald as a deep threat boggled my mind.

Martz took a lot of heat for not using the running game enough, but having watched most of Detroit's games, I really can't blame him in many cases. The running game was either completely ineffective or the team was down early and needed to rely on their strengths (passing game) to get back into games. Only a couple games did Bell, Jones, or Duckett get anything going at all.

Anyway, I was glad to see Martz move on. I fully admit his schemes are effective and there is a place for them in the league, but they are contrary to the head coach's philosophy of fundamental, smash-mouth football. The Lions need to build an offensive line and play physical football to gain any foundation of a winner.
It certainly was not a fit in Detroit and it seemed to only further hinder and weaken the weaknesses already present in the offense.

Iwas just pointing out that just because you do not have a proven set of WR's or QB does not mean that Martz's offense will not be successful. He can run it and put up yards without the big name guys at those positions. The guys there will end up being successful because of Martz's schemes.

As much I like the numbers and his schemes that his offense produces I am also surprisingly not that sad to see him go. The Lions do not have the defense that can make up for all the short possessions on offense and the offense really could have benefited from a more traditional scheme developmentally speaking. I think that the Martz offense was able to make it look better and rank higher than it actually was.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 03:11 PM   #1974
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

The 49ers need to work on their O-line. That was why they traded this year's 1st rounder to NE, so they could grab Joe Staley OT, who had a bit of a tough rookie season. Of course, teams loaded up on the run and Alex Smith never made them pay. Nor did Trent Dilfer. I actually hated the play calling this year. It seemed to be trying to make Smith into a pocket passer when he was much more effective when he was able to scramble. The whole offense just never seemed to get in sync and was really tough to watch. This is 6 OCs in 6 years. Hopefully we can see a bit of progress this year.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 07:12 PM   #1975
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07 View Post
With the preseason over, the regular season is officially on. It will be interesting to see the significant cuts on Monday.

SB XLII prediction is the Chargers over the Saints

Teams to be better than expected are Jacksonville, Houston, Carolina and the Giants

Teams to be worse than expected are Denver, Seattle and Chicago.

If one coach is fired midseason it will be the kid in Oakland.
Heh thought it would be good to review the preseason pics

SB pics ... well the chargers were close, as for the better than expected I'd say 3 for 4, with Jacksonville Houston and NYG. Worse than expected Id say 2 for three there with Denver and Chicago.
Flames in 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 02:46 PM   #1976
Displaced Flames fan
Franchise Player
 
Displaced Flames fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07 View Post
Heh thought it would be good to review the preseason pics

SB pics ... well the chargers were close, as for the better than expected I'd say 3 for 4, with Jacksonville Houston and NYG. Worse than expected Id say 2 for three there with Denver and Chicago.
I'd give you Seattle too, even though they still won their division I don't think they were as good as most expected.

I had New England over Dallas in the SB.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
Displaced Flames fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 02:49 PM   #1977
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post

I'm going to take the Patriots over the Chargers in the AFC title game this year and the Eagles over the Saints for the NFC. In the Superbowl...same as it ever was Patriots....puke.
Well I had the AFC right, and I think I'll get the Superbowl winner right. I don't think anyone had the Giants for the NFC....don't think the Packers had many pick them for the NFC Championship game either.
Sylvanfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy