View Poll Results: Do you support the current version of CalgaryNEXT?
|
Yes
|
  
|
163 |
25.39% |
No
|
  
|
356 |
55.45% |
Undecided
|
  
|
123 |
19.16% |
06-27-2016, 11:00 AM
|
#1961
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:03 AM
|
#1962
|
Franchise Player
|
Is CSEC the Flames?
And who are they selling the land too? The Flames or a third party?
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:26 AM
|
#1963
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Another vision of #CalgaryNext just presented in a video to #yyccc:
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:31 AM
|
#1964
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic
Another vision of #CalgaryNext just presented in a video to #yyccc:
|
I know it's a render but the roof doesn't seem high enough for football.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:35 AM
|
#1965
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
King says he thinks it would be appropriate to open up the Flames books to the city manager under a confidentiality agreement. (if this goes further down the line).
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:36 AM
|
#1966
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cappy
I know it's a render but the roof doesn't seem high enough for football.
|
I believe the field would be below grade.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:39 AM
|
#1967
|
Self Imposed Exile
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
King says he thinks it would be appropriate to open up the Flames books to the city manager under a confidentiality agreement. (if this goes further down the line).
|
This is a win for the City, and should be a minimum requirement for a public funding request of this scale.
It bugs me that the City had to win this, and it isn't just an expectation, but still a very small step in the right direction.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:41 AM
|
#1968
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
King says CSEC will provide the security for the User Fee (i.e. ticket tax)
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:42 AM
|
#1969
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy
This is a win for the City, and should be a minimum requirement for a public funding request of this scale.
It bugs me that the City had to win this, and it isn't just an expectation, but still a very small step in the right direction.
|
How did they have to win it?
The councilor asked for it, and he said yes with condition of confidentiality.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:42 AM
|
#1970
|
Self Imposed Exile
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
How did they have to win it?
The councilor asked for it, and he said yes with condition of confidentiality.
|
oh fair enough, I just assumed as it is my understanding the Flames and other professional sports organizations say no to this request when asking for arena funding.
Good on them for saying yes at the first request then.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 11:49 AM
|
#1971
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic
Another vision of #CalgaryNext just presented in a video to #yyccc:
|
I see a Dodge Viper
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:01 PM
|
#1972
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Councilors ask if CESC will front the CRL...
King says it is a negotiable point.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:03 PM
|
#1973
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Lunch: Back at 1:15pm
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:07 PM
|
#1974
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic
Another vision of #CalgaryNext just presented in a video to #yyccc:
|
I see the roof of the Derek Zoolander School For Kids That Can't Read Good And Want To Do Other Things Good Too
Last edited by 3rd Degree; 06-27-2016 at 12:13 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to 3rd Degree For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:25 PM
|
#1975
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:25 PM
|
#1976
|
Franchise Player
|
nm
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:25 PM
|
#1977
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Councilors ask if CESC will front the CRL...
King says it is a negotiable point.
|
It looks like they're making some positive progress. Maybe we will avoid the threats to move to Quebec City.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:28 PM
|
#1978
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
I'm on board if they can guarantee permanent lens flare for a 1km radius around the complex.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to worth For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:29 PM
|
#1979
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Having the fieldhouse be excavated several meters below grade next to a river that sometimes likes to Flood doesn't seem like a very future proof plan.
I know that apparently that part of the river doesn't appear to flood significantly, but I can't help but notice how the city component happens to be the part below grade.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 12:29 PM
|
#1980
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
CFL Mode looks a lot better than previous pictures.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Fire For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 AM.
|
|