Canadian Federal Politics Thread v5

[Scroopy Noopers]

Originally Posted by Whynotnow

Ok so there’s a rational “political” reason for it, but how about stepping up to the plate and being a leader. Get informed, and then stop spreading misinformation to your base in order to score political points.

He doesn’t want to be a leader. He wants to be political opposition. And he’s demonstrating that clearly.

[PepsiFree]

Originally Posted by calgarygeologist

The report also finds that:

Stuff we already knew

[calgarygeologist]

Originally Posted by PepsiFree

Stuff we already knew

Pretty unfortunate though because this government was supposed to be the most transparent ever.

[PepsiFree]

Originally Posted by calgarygeologist

Pretty unfortunate though because this government was supposed to be the most transparent ever.

Yeah pretty sure that ship sailed years ago. Where have you been?

Unfortunately it doesn’t look like we’re in for a change as PP insists on keeping the water as muddy as possible so he’s not beholden to the truth.

Guess a vote for the CPC is out if you care about transparency or foreign interference.

[Doctorfever]

C’mon guys.

We all know the current government is nfg.

What we are trying to do here is lay some of that blame on the next government. Who aren’t elected.

Yet.

[Roughneck]

Originally Posted by calgarygeologist

Pretty unfortunate though because this government was supposed to be the most transparent ever.

They have very rational reasons not to be.

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by Doctorfever

C’mon guys.

We all know the current government is nfg.

What we are trying to do here is lay some of that blame on the next government. Who aren’t elected.

Yet.

They are.


But the current "government in waiting" is more interested in remaining ignorant of some matters to score political points , and people seem ok with that.

Brutal

Great ####ing choices.

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

They are.


But the current "government in waiting" is more interested in remaining ignorant of some matters to score political points , and people seem ok with that.

Brutal

Great ####ing choices.

Source?

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by Doctorfever

Source?

Did you receive a blow to the head this morning?

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by Roughneck

They have very rational reasons not to be.

What would that reason be?

Why would they not want to be transparent, since, you know, they ran a campaign on it and you voted for it?

Is it the scandals? Or other reasons?

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

Did you receive a blow to the head this morning?

Not unless you have a source for that.

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by Doctorfever

Source?

Hey maybe I am wrong.

I'd love to be educated.


Why can't/doesn't the leader of the official opposition security clearances?

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

Hey maybe I am wrong.

I'd love to be educated.


Why can't/doesn't the leader of the official opposition security clearances?

Apologies, I thought you were serious in your initial post

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by Doctorfever

Apologies, I thought you were serious in your initial post

You disingenuous fcuk

[shotinthebacklund]

The whole PP security clearance is just the governments effort (which clearly works) of deploying a red herring fallacy.

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

You disingenuous fcuk

Thank you.

[Scroopy Noopers]

Originally Posted by Doctorfever

C’mon guys.

We all know the current government is nfg.

What we are trying to do here is lay some of that blame on the next government. Who aren’t elected.

Yet.

I’m trying to get any serious party in Canada to put forth a leader I want to vote for. That’s it.

[TheIronMaiden]

I find it difficult to vote for a conservative party that does not want to read the report on foreign interference.

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers

I’m trying to get any serious party in Canada to put forth a leader I want to vote for. That’s it.

Would you vote for O’Toole?

[Roughneck]

Originally Posted by Doctorfever

What would that reason be?

Why would they not want to be transparent, since, you know, they ran a campaign on it and you voted for it?

Is it the scandals? Or other reasons?

Not politically advantageous enough to do so seems to be rational enough reasons these days.