|
View Poll Results: Best guess for Tkachuk's contract result
|
|
8 @ 7M
|
   
|
10 |
1.61% |
|
8 @ 8M
|
  
|
41 |
6.59% |
|
8 @ 9M
|
  
|
21 |
3.38% |
|
8 @ 10M
|
  
|
8 |
1.29% |
|
7 @ 7M
|
  
|
21 |
3.38% |
|
7 @ 8M
|
  
|
61 |
9.81% |
|
7 @ 9M
|
|
19 |
3.05% |
|
7 @ 10M
|
|
3 |
0.48% |
|
6 @ 6M
|
|
4 |
0.64% |
|
6 @ 7M
|
|
48 |
7.72% |
|
6 @ 8M
|
|
126 |
20.26% |
|
6 @ 9M
|
|
27 |
4.34% |
|
5 @ 6M
|
|
3 |
0.48% |
|
5 @ 7M
|
|
56 |
9.00% |
|
5 @ 8M
|
|
66 |
10.61% |
|
5 @ 9M
|
|
10 |
1.61% |
|
4 @ 5M
|
|
1 |
0.16% |
|
4 @ 6M
|
|
4 |
0.64% |
|
4 @ 7M
|
|
19 |
3.05% |
|
3 @ 4M
|
|
2 |
0.32% |
|
3 @ 5M
|
|
4 |
0.64% |
|
3 @ 6M
|
|
46 |
7.40% |
|
2 @ 4M
|
|
3 |
0.48% |
|
2 @ 5M
|
|
15 |
2.41% |
|
1 @ 4M
|
|
1 |
0.16% |
|
1 @ 5M
|
|
3 |
0.48% |
09-23-2019, 06:50 PM
|
#1881
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
I disagree. Treliving does not have to trade a player right away, as I illustrated above. There are players that other teams will value enough to pay a fair asking price, and because Treliving is not cornered, he does not just have to accept whatever is offered to get under the cap.
I’m sure they would rather not, but in a pinch, if the Flames are unhappy with offers on trades for players it is most certainly a viable option.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
So have you seen enough discussion to enter an answer to the poll question? :-)
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 07:38 PM
|
#1882
|
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
So have you seen enough discussion to enter an answer to the poll question? :-)
|
Not a chance.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 08:01 PM
|
#1883
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
|
I wonder how many pages of discussion we will see once he finally signs. Under over of 35
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 08:05 PM
|
#1884
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23
I wonder how many pages of discussion we will see once he finally signs. Under over of 35
|
This thread has been going since May and hasn't hit 35 pages yet. Once he signs, we'll actually have games to talk about and stuff, so I'd say significantly fewer than 35 pages.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 08:05 PM
|
#1885
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Pretty annoying he isnt inked yet.
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 08:14 PM
|
#1886
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky
Pretty annoying he isnt inked yet.
|
Yup. Thankfully we still have another week before the season starts, so here's hoping this finally gets done before then. Whatever the sticking point is, I'm sure both sides want this over and done with as quickly as possible.
If he's not signed by puck drop on Oct. 3rd, I'm worried that this might turn into a big unnecessary distraction, which is the last thing this team needs heading into the season.
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 08:17 PM
|
#1887
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
This thread has been going since May and hasn't hit 35 pages yet. Once he signs, we'll actually have games to talk about and stuff, so I'd say significantly fewer than 35 pages.
|
Fair enough!
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 08:40 PM
|
#1888
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
When Gaudreau signed, the signing thread didn't make it to 650 posts. That would be a good over/under for a Tkachuk signing thread.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 08:41 PM
|
#1889
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
|
But for some reason, it'll get bumped randomly every few months and years with a random thought on Tkachuk because so many people are against just starting new threads
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 09:17 PM
|
#1890
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I wonder how last year’s playoff performance has factored into this negotiation.
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 09:18 PM
|
#1891
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy
I wonder how last year’s playoff performance has factored into this negotiation.
|
very little
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 09:20 PM
|
#1892
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
very little
|
none
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 09:22 PM
|
#1893
|
|
Franchise Player
|
My Gameboy says 1895 posts.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 09:25 PM
|
#1894
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Top paid player in the league has made the playoffs 1 time in 4 years
Marner couple points lost in first round 11M
Point swept in first round
It really isnt much of a factor as much as Flames fans demand a discount
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 11:26 PM
|
#1895
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Friedman on SN960 just said that he believes both Tkachuk and the Flames want to sign a long term deal.
|
To clarify, I just listened to the clip and Friedman said 5-6 years.
5 would be disappointing IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 11:27 PM
|
#1896
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Don’t disagree just wondered whether playoff success gets discussed.
In a perfect world player compensation would be tied to playoff performance.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Manhattanboy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 11:28 PM
|
#1897
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
To clarify, I just listened to the clip and Friedman said 5-6 years.
5 would be disappointing IMO.
|
In 5 years, I guess.
I’m not making plans 5 years out
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2019, 11:34 PM
|
#1898
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
In 5 years, I guess.
I’m not making plans 5 years out
|
I mean, yeah I'll take a 5 year deal at this point if the alternative is a holdout.
But I'd prefer a 6/7/8 year deal but that might not be feasible given the cap situation.
|
|
|
|
|
09-24-2019, 12:46 AM
|
#1899
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
If Tkachuk wants 5, then he can have 5 as long as he is willing to take somewhat of a discount.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-24-2019, 12:55 AM
|
#1900
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
I mean, yeah I'll take a 5 year deal at this point if the alternative is a holdout.
But I'd prefer a 6/7/8 year deal but that might not be feasible given the cap situation.
|
Fair comment.
I just think the next 3-5 years is a bit of a window of contention for this team with Norris Gio, and the current set of players and contracts.
A lot of changes happen in 5 years. It was a typical long contract term before the cap era, then we had a few outrageous 13-14 year deals, then the renegotiation with term cap at 8.
I get that Tkachuk is 21 and 8 years locks down his whole prime. I know that 5 years walks him to UFA. I actually prefer a bridge deal. But 5 years for now leaves little to worry about for this window.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:52 AM.
|
|
