01-29-2024, 06:03 PM
|
#18541
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
...if this is true, I can't be the only one thinking the Flames should considering protecting their asset and scratching him until a trade has been finalized.
|
No kidding sometimes I feel like he's one shot block on the ankle away from done for the season
__________________
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 06:25 PM
|
#18542
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naitix
Ya we are not getting that for Lindholm
|
In a year where:
1. Lindholm is playing to his potential
2. There’s a possibility of the acquiring team extending him
3. There are more contending teams with cap room
He may bring those types of returns
It’s possible these factors weren’t considered when putting these estimated trades together
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 06:48 PM
|
#18543
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slightly right of left of center
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
You're assuming they made a pick in that range every year - you have to look at how many picks they made in that range.
Since the lockout here are the picks the Flames made from 20-30:
2006: Irving
2007: Backlund
2008: Nemisz
2009: Erixon
2012: Jankowski
2013: Poirier, Klimchuk
2019: Pelletier
2020: Zary
So they made 9 picks from 20-30 and I would argue that 4 were successful so far (Backlund, Jankowski, Pelletier, Zary)
Will be interesting to see too...but I think in the last 5 year or so we are seeing more players taken in that range have an impact than in the prior years.
|
Go back the last ten drafts. Not many impact players in that range...
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:01 PM
|
#18544
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slightly right of left of center
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
You're assuming they made a pick in that range every year - you have to look at how many picks they made in that range.
Since the lockout here are the picks the Flames made from 20-30:
2006: Irving
2007: Backlund
2008: Nemisz
2009: Erixon
2012: Jankowski
2013: Poirier, Klimchuk
2019: Pelletier
2020: Zary
So they made 9 picks from 20-30 and I would argue that 4 were successful so far (Backlund, Jankowski, Pelletier, Zary)
Will be interesting to see too...but I think in the last 5 year or so we are seeing more players taken in that range have an impact than in the prior years.
|
Backlund is great. One of my favorites, but still a depth player, a very good one though. Jankowski is a replacement level nhler. Pelletier looks great but probably 2nd liner or 3rd. So he is like Backlund. Zary could be a game changer though.
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:05 PM
|
#18545
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm at work, so it's hard to list everything out. 2020 had a very strong back half of the first round. 2019, the second round was significantly better than the 20-32 picks. 2018, lots of impact defensemen.
Generally, I think that junior players are becoming stronger in terms of development within the last decade. It's not just top 10 or bust anymore.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:07 PM
|
#18546
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Just came by to say that I LOVE the Bruins’ proposed offer from a few pages ago. Frederic has always been severely underrated, but he’s really fulfilling his potential this season. Good skater with size, and tough as nails. Poitras is going to be a star.
Edit: Didn’t see the poll.
Last edited by Sandman; 01-29-2024 at 07:15 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:18 PM
|
#18547
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger
Go back the last ten drafts. Not many impact players in that range...
|
I would probably start around 2017, because later draft picks usually take a bit longer:
2017: Robert Thomas, Oetinger, Chytil; verdict still out: Frost, Tolvanen
2016: Tage Thompson
2015: Erikkson-Ek, Boesser, Konecny
2014: Pasternak, Schmaltz, McCann, Kempe
2013: Shea Theodore
2012: Skjei
2011: Rakell, Denault
2010: Kuznetsov, Charlie Coyle, Brock Nelson
2009: Palmieri
2008: John Carlson, Eberle
So yeah you're right probably about a 20% chance to get an impact player. Probably 8-10% to get a guy that can drive a line/pairing.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:28 PM
|
#18548
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
Just came by to say that I LOVE the Bruins’ proposed offer from a few pages ago. Frederic has always been severely underrated, but he’s really fulfilling his potential this season. Good skater with size, and tough as nails. Poitras is going to be a star.
Edit: Didn’t see the poll.
|
This 100 percent; I’ve had Frederic in my categories hockey pool for 4 weeks since picking him up on waivers and I just can’t drop him now, he does everything you want a middle six guy to do and he’s definitely on the top part of that middle 6 and if given a bigger role could really thrive on a 2nd line. He would be a really, really good ingredient to add to the mix of forwards and is a player we really don’t have coming up or currently on the roster.
I agree as well he’s underrated generally around the league amongst fans and he certainly wouldn’t be a throw in. With Conner Bedards supposedly even better cousin up for draft in 2025 the more 1st rounders in the pocket the better, totally fine with waiting and with the Bruins as good as they are I’d ask for it unprotected. Poitras being the cherry on top of that proposal is ridiculous and makes me feel like it’s not possible… but the flames have more than just Lindy to trade.
It’s really a fascinating and unprecedented situation Conroy is in and I don’t envy him, waiting on players like Tanev though any longer is making me nervous lol. Hopefully we make a trade sooner than later and start the ball rolling here!!
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Heavy Jack For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:40 PM
|
#18549
|
UnModerator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc
Forget Quark, he was a petty crook. Now, Nog, on the other hand, had real lobes for profitable deals...
|
Nog legit gave up on being a Ferengi because he knew he never had the Lobes. Calm down. That family was all Quark and Ishka.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKOCPHL Ottawa Vancouver
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Blaster86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:48 PM
|
#18550
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slightly right of left of center
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
I would probably start around 2017, because later draft picks usually take a bit longer:
2017: Robert Thomas, Oetinger, Chytil; verdict still out: Frost, Tolvanen
2016: Tage Thompson
2015: Erikkson-Ek, Boesser, Konecny
2014: Pasternak, Schmaltz, McCann, Kempe
2013: Shea Theodore
2012: Skjei
2011: Rakell, Denault
2010: Kuznetsov, Charlie Coyle, Brock Nelson
2009: Palmieri
2008: John Carlson, Eberle
So yeah you're right probably about a 20% chance to get an impact player. Probably 8-10% to get a guy that can drive a line/pairing.
|
And that is the other point. Around these picks it is 3 to 5 years out to be an impact player
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 07:52 PM
|
#18551
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger
And that is the other point. Around these picks it is 3 to 5 years out to be an impact player
|
Yes and the Flames are going to be bad for 3-5 years
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 08:30 PM
|
#18552
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Whatever trades happen before the deadline I hope Conny goes out and does a little shopping himself.
I'm thinking of players like Victor Soderstrom or even Jiricek. Build the D corps with young defensemen that can play today.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 08:35 PM
|
#18553
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Whatever trades happen before the deadline I hope Conny goes out and does a little shopping himself.
I'm thinking of players like Victor Soderstrom or even Jiricek. Build the D corps with young defensemen that can play today.
|
Why? Players have the most value at the deadline and picks have the most value at the draft. Sell who you can, load up on picks, and then go shopping at the draft if an opportunity presents itself. It also allows us to know exactly who is available with those picks. Say we get a pick around 20-25 and Iginla is available, you take him. Or maybe there’s a big drop in tiers so instead we move that pick in a trade for Jiricek. It wouldn’t make sense to spend assets on players right now that would only hurt our own draft position.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2024, 08:37 PM
|
#18554
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I don't think we should equate number of teams interested with highest return. Part of the reason there are so many teams is that he is in a more attainable price range, and a good defensive defenseman is a universal commodity. Not as straight-forward for a guy like Lindholm - either he is someone you have a hole in your lineup to fill, or he is not. Fewer suiters, but still higher value.
|
But with that many suiters competing against each other, you will more likely get the highest possible return in that price range.
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 09:36 PM
|
#18555
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
But with that many suiters competing against each other, you will more likely get the highest possible return in that price range.
|
Yes for sure. But still unlikely his price skyrockets to the point of returning more than the other guys, which was the discussion point.
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 09:39 PM
|
#18556
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time
In a year where:
1. Lindholm is playing to his potential
2. There’s a possibility of the acquiring team extending him
3. There are more contending teams with cap room
He may bring those types of returns
It’s possible these factors weren’t considered when putting these estimated trades together
|
1. That would help of course, but it isn't as big a deal as some fans are making it to be, IMO
2. There is
3. There are NEVER contending teams with cap room. One of the reasons that Lindholm is so valuable, is the beautiful $4.85M salary he boasts. That will put his deadline cost at about $1M. Retain half and, well you can do the math.
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 10:25 PM
|
#18557
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
1. That would help of course, but it isn't as big a deal as some fans are making it to be, IMO
2. There is
3. There are NEVER contending teams with cap room. One of the reasons that Lindholm is so valuable, is the beautiful $4.85M salary he boasts. That will put his deadline cost at about $1M. Retain half and, well you can do the math.
|
1 you want a rental that’s playing like he doesn’t want to get hurt?
2 he’s walking to free agency
3 1+2 + no cap. Yep you’re right Mr. Feaster
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 10:46 PM
|
#18558
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I’d work hard with Florida to get another blockbuster done. That way, there will be less chance of a surprise with next year and the pick going to MTL.
The way I read it, Flames need to have their own pick be top 10 and Floridas cannot be top 10 to be best case scenario for CGY.
|
|
|
01-29-2024, 10:52 PM
|
#18559
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86
Nog legit gave up on being a Ferengi because he knew he never had the Lobes. Calm down. That family was all Quark and Ishka.
|
Well, hopefully whomever trades for Lindholm, Tanev or Hanifin is a lot more like Rom than either Quark or Ishka.
Wait... do you see a resemblance?
NSFW for size - it is safe to open.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2024, 10:53 PM
|
#18560
|
UnModerator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
|
Allvin would make an excellent Ferengi.
I do like that you just compared the Canucks GM to the Grand Nagus of the Ferengi Alliance who swindled his entire planet's way into the Federation. I'm here for it.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKOCPHL Ottawa Vancouver
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Blaster86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 AM.
|
|