Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-04-2008, 12:32 AM   #1801
flamey_mcflame
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Exp:
Default

Geez Sweaters, I'd rather swallow your tripe than having any form of NDP government, but can you please stop making a fool of yourself. First, the blatant lie in regards to "flag gate". And then your infomercial, whining on national TV. Using divide and conquer politics similar to Karl Rove only works on an ignorant,uneducated and redneck electorate like the southern U.S. . You will have to convince a liberal country why you won't return to your dictorial ways. Although the NDP would probably bankrupt this country, at least |I do not have to worry about being sent to the gulag if I get on their bad side. Smarten up Harper, play fair and have respect for the house of parliament and the other members. Then, and only then, will you garner the respect of the 62% of the country that did not vote for you.

Everyday I wake up, I feel like I'm in this horrible neverending nightmare. One road leads to financial collapse led by Layton and the unions. And the other side is a spendaholic Conservative government that refuses to show respect to the party that has kept this country together all these years.
flamey_mcflame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:08 AM   #1802
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamey_mcflame View Post
Geez Sweaters, I'd rather swallow your tripe than having any form of NDP government, but can you please stop making a fool of yourself. First, the blatant lie in regards to "flag gate". And then your infomercial, whining on national TV. Using divide and conquer politics similar to Karl Rove only works on an ignorant,uneducated and redneck electorate like the southern U.S. . You will have to convince a liberal country why you won't return to your dictorial ways. Although the NDP would probably bankrupt this country, at least |I do not have to worry about being sent to the gulag if I get on their bad side. Smarten up Harper, play fair and have respect for the house of parliament and the other members. Then, and only then, will you garner the respect of the 62% of the country that did not vote for you.

Everyday I wake up, I feel like I'm in this horrible neverending nightmare. One road leads to financial collapse led by Layton and the unions. And the other side is a spendaholic Conservative government that refuses to show respect to the party that has kept this country together all these years.
As it was last night, you've got the art of melodramatic wording and vivid imagery once again down...and also, a whole lot of sizzle and not a lot of steak.

As you compare the Conservaties to 3 different poltical ideologies in your disjointed post, interested to hear your impressions of the party that the "intelligent and educated people", as you called them yesterday "can finally vote for", and their leader, after today's circus..or as you put them "the party the kept this country together all these years" and in the stroke of a pen decides to play roulette with the party that wants to split the country apart.
browna is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:17 AM   #1803
Jagger
First Line Centre
 
Jagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Red Deer now; Liverpool, England before
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
I'd like to see video of all that running around by the Liberal party set to the "Benny Hill theme".
I'm not talented enough to actually create a video like that for you but ever since reading your post I can't get the darned theme out of my head! Thanks Jiri!

It is just so apt for this coalition in so many ways.

Here it is.

Enjoy!

__________________
"It's red all over!!!!"
Jagger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:39 AM   #1804
flamey_mcflame
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
As it was last night, you've got the art of melodramatic wording and vivid imagery once again down...and also, a whole lot of sizzle and not a lot of steak.

As you compare the Conservaties to 3 different poltical ideologies in your disjointed post, interested to hear your impressions of the party that the "intelligent and educated people", as you called them yesterday "can finally vote for", and their leader, after today's circus..or as you put them "the party the kept this country together all these years" and in the stroke of a pen decides to play roulette with the party that wants to split the country apart.
I must say I appreciate your sensible feedback browna. I can sense liberal yearnings within your words. Always room for one more . After all, if you have been following this thread and you were foreign to this country, whose party faithful would you most likely align with. Enough said.
flamey_mcflame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 06:08 AM   #1805
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
After all, if you have been following this thread and you were foreign to this country, whose party faithful would you most likely align with. Enough said.
Well since it is obviously not the Conservatives in your oh so melodramatic world...who is it?

The Liberals with their lame duck leader who cant help but come off as a buffoon every time the pressure is on and who have blatently lied to Canadians about forming a coalition with the NDP?

The NDP and their socialistic ways who could not be a poorer choice in times of fiscal uncertainty?

Or is it the Bloq Quebecois, who by their own admission could care less about any part of Canada but that piece of land that lies within the borders of the Quebec?

Or are you suggesting that there is now a Liberal/NDP/Bloq party that, should parliament be dissolved and an election called, will run under the same umbrella in a case of proving they meant what they said when they sat in front of cameras on Monday and told everyone that what they were doing "is in the best interests of Canada"?

Please elaborate if you would.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 06:17 AM   #1806
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

Slightly OT...I think Harper made a serious error by introducing a fiscal update with so many provocative initiatives and showing a serious inability to collaborate...although he certainly has other great leadership qualities, this whole situation may have been avoidable if he wasn't such a prcik and he is lucky the opposition seems to get gobsmacked by routine tasks like a making a speech...if they were halfway competent he would definitely be in the opposition come 2009 IMO

If Parliment is parouged (sp?) the CPC will get through this simply because the coalition will keep walking into sharp objects for the next two months however the next time the CPC has a leadership convention Harper will suffer for this
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fozzie_DeBear For This Useful Post:
Old 12-04-2008, 06:58 AM   #1807
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
If Parliment is parouged (sp?) the CPC will get through this simply because the coalition will keep walking into sharp objects for the next two months however the next time the CPC has a leadership convention Harper will suffer for this
Prorouged?

Anyhow...I dont disgree with what you are saying at all with regards to harper. He made a bit of a tactical mistake that as someon else coined was responded too by taking a nuclear bomb to kill a mosquito. The party may have unity behind his idea of cutting taxpayer dollars to prop up parties, but timing and optics matter a lot too and he has caused all of his MP's a great deal of work because of it.

That being said, this is no time for him to backdown from the face of seperatists having the ability to extort the country's financial coffers. Afterall, as Dion and Layton have admitted repeatedly, they feel they are better equipped to guide the country through the forseeable financial crisis, yet have no plan of their own and can't even co-ordinate a proper 3 minute video when needed. Beyond that, even if people don't think Harper was given a mandate to run the country, they have to admit that Dion was most certainly told in no uncertain terms he was not wanted by a huge majority of Canadians as well. So harper should fight this fight based just on that situation alone.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 07:03 AM   #1808
Flame On
Franchise Player
 
Flame On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozzie_DeBear View Post
Slightly OT...I think Harper made a serious error by introducing a fiscal update with so many provocative initiatives and showing a serious inability to collaborate...although he certainly has other great leadership qualities, this whole situation may have been avoidable if he wasn't such a prcik and he is lucky the opposition seems to get gobsmacked by routine tasks like a making a speech...if they were halfway competent he would definitely be in the opposition come 2009 IMO

If Parliment is parouged (sp?) the CPC will get through this simply because the coalition will keep walking into sharp objects for the next two months however the next time the CPC has a leadership convention Harper will suffer for this
Good post.
And I think once the Libs have a new leader they'll do pretty well out of it in the end too. They'll paint the coalition scheme as all Dion and Layton (who cares about the seperatists), the crisis origin as Harper's doing and voila. This isn't wishful thinking on my part per se, I just can see it spun like that. Actually thats not spin.
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.

Last edited by Flame On; 12-04-2008 at 07:06 AM.
Flame On is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flame On For This Useful Post:
Old 12-04-2008, 08:25 AM   #1809
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I think that if the GG suspends Parliment that this coalition will have lost its chance to gain power.

I'm willing to bet that the Conservatives release an extremely voter friendly budget that would make the Coalition look like completely anti-Canadian D-bags if they vote it down in a confidence vote.

I think after last night, that the coalition has to realize by their performance that they have a lot of work to do to be considered anything other then a joke and a pain in the ass to Canada.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:33 AM   #1810
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I think that if the GG suspends Parliment that this coalition will have lost its chance to gain power.

I'm willing to bet that the Conservatives release an extremely voter friendly budget that would make the Coalition look like completely anti-Canadian D-bags if they vote it down in a confidence vote.

I think after last night, that the coalition has to realize by their performance that they have a lot of work to do to be considered anything other then a joke and a pain in the ass to Canada.
If I'm not mistaken, they probably won't even get to read the budget. My understanding is that the first opportunity for a confidence vote is the Throne Speech - which comes before the budget.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:33 AM   #1811
Phaneuf3
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I think after last night, that the coalition has to realize by their performance that they have a lot of work to do to be considered anything other then a joke and a pain in the ass to Canada.
Except in Quebec and to the most die hard liberal/ndp members.
Phaneuf3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:40 AM   #1812
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneuf3 View Post
Except in Quebec and to the most die hard liberal/ndp members.
Well I think last night even the most die hard members of the coalition have to be seeing the "humor" in the situation.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:41 AM   #1813
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Reading that Rick Mercer rant, I'll just let him speak for me. He said what I have been trying to say since this began, only much better.

Rick Mercer for PM - he seems to have more common sense than the rest of these leaders combined.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:41 AM   #1814
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
If I'm not mistaken, they probably won't even get to read the budget. My understanding is that the first opportunity for a confidence vote is the Throne Speech - which comes before the budget.
True, however they can be as detailed as they like in the throne speech. they can basically release the budget details in the throne speech.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:42 AM   #1815
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
Reading that Rick Mercer rant, I'll just let him speak for me. He said what I have been trying to say since this began, only much better.

Rick Mercer for PM - he seems to have more common sense than the rest of these leaders combined.
If only he was actually funny.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:42 AM   #1816
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
If I'm not mistaken, they probably won't even get to read the budget. My understanding is that the first opportunity for a confidence vote is the Throne Speech - which comes before the budget.
Some elements of the budget would be in the Throne Speech for sure the budget would be leaked by then and the opposition would be responsible for defeating it.

As conservative as I am, I can't see the GG proroguing parliament because the PM has no friends and is afraid of losing his job (plus there is a coalition ready to govern). Prorogation is there for emergencies like war or a natural disaster, not because a PM is scared of losing his job.

Harper really really messed up this time and I don't think anyone can save him.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:45 AM   #1817
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Things that can happen

1) Prorougue - Parliment shuts down, however the GG lays conditions on the length, making Parliment come back early in Janurary instead of late in Janurary (most likely)
2) GG does nothing lets the confidence vote happen. (possible)
a) 10 Liberal/NDP/Bloc MP's stage a mini rebellion and just don't show up for the vote (slim chance)
b) Harper convinces 9 or more of the coalition members to cross the floor and gets his majority (no chance)
c) The coalition votes down the government Parliment falls.
1) GG grants the coalition government, we get no budget until late spring (unlikely at this point unless the Coalition can do one hell of a sell job)
2) GG dissolves Parliment and sends us to the polls government spending stops til after the election (most likely and least contraversial)
3) Harper approaches the Coalition hat in hand and negotiates an end to the crisis (unlikely)
4) Harper declares Marshall Law, lines up the members of the opposition and shoots them, declares himself Harper the 1st and begins building work camps to stimulate the economy. All industry gears for war.

Think thats it
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

Last edited by CaptainCrunch; 12-04-2008 at 08:50 AM.
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 12-04-2008, 08:45 AM   #1818
atb
First Line Centre
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Things that can happen

1) Prorougue - Parliment shuts down, however the GG lays conditions on the length, making Parliment come back early in Janurary instead of late in Janurary
2) GG does nothing lets the confidence vote happen.
Can't she also call for an election?
atb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:47 AM   #1819
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

The more I look into this whole thing, the more I wonder if this is just payback for Harper leading the no confidence vote against Martin.

Methinks the Liberals are still pretty pissed about that and, in typical Liberal fashion, are prepared to seek revenge at any cost. The problem they fail to see, however, is that the present day Conservative Government is nowhere even close to being in the disarray and turmoil that the Liberal Government was in, when it was defeated in 2005.

I think the Liberals would really like it if Canadians would just stfu and let them get their revenge, but Canadians have always been an a bit of annoying mosquito buzzing around the Grand Plans™ of the Liberals. Isn't that right, Mr. Chretien?

If only Dion had the physical strength to "choke a bitch" à la Chretien's impressive skills... but, alas, Dion's only strength is in the almighty do-over.

Last edited by FanIn80; 12-04-2008 at 09:02 AM.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 08:52 AM   #1820
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atb112 View Post
Can't she also call for an election?
Yeah I hit the tab button by mistake and suffered form premature postulation.

rest is up there.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy