Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-25-2024, 07:47 PM   #18001
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzle View Post
Haha... Alberta gonna Alberta

https://globalnews.ca/news/10316372/...armacare-plan/

If Alberta asks for the per capita funding in cash, I hope the federal govt tells them to shove it.
I dont understand. The Feds are offering free money and Alberta intends to say 'no?'

For why?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2024, 07:50 PM   #18002
Amethyst
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
I dont understand. The Feds are offering free money and Alberta intends to say 'no?'

For why?
Because they'd rather fight with the feds than provide services for Albertans.
Amethyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2024, 07:56 PM   #18003
Whynotnow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amethyst View Post
Because they'd rather fight with the feds than provide services for Albertans.
They are similar to us republicans. In the us the republicans are blocking everything even if it makes sense because they don’t want Biden to get any wins. The UCP has torn a page out of that, even if it does make sense and might be good policy they just fight it out of principle of opposing the liberals and the big bad federal government.
Whynotnow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Whynotnow For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2024, 08:00 PM   #18004
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amethyst View Post
Because they'd rather fight with the feds than provide services for Albertans.
They also know that the worse things get, the more their base will support them because their base is stupid and gullible and will blame all their problems on immigrants, the Liberals, liberals and the NDP.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2024, 08:00 PM   #18005
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Albertans should be pissed. They're going to pay into the program and not get anything back for it if the UCP has their way. Then they'll demonize the feds over it.

I'm sure with the current state of affordability, this would probably help out a few families who need that medical assistance with no insurance.

And if they actually did get per capita funding, they'd just keep it, not spend it, or give it away to their friends and allies.

Worst government in Canadian history.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2024, 08:07 PM   #18006
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I'm pretty sure they'll get the per capita funding for opting out, because the precedent has been set by Quebec for a variety of other things.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2024, 08:12 PM   #18007
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
I'm pretty sure they'll get the per capita funding for opting out, because the precedent has been set by Quebec for a variety of other things.
They caved on daycare,

They will cave here even if they get per capita funding. Once other provinces have free birth control it will poll very well in Calgary and that will matter.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2024, 08:13 PM   #18008
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Not that I want to defend the statement or decision and I definitely don't know much about the existing program but Alberta already provides coverage for people without workplace benefits via Blue Cross. It could be possible that instead of implementing/joining a new national program it is just easier to continue to offer Blue Cross. The per capital funding request could potentially be used to boost the benefits available under Blue Cross or reduce/offset the premiums for the program.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2024, 08:46 PM   #18009
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Where I work has blue cross coverage, of which they pay half of premiums, and there is no opting out. Against the backdrop of poor wages, the 50% payment is already restrictive and doesn't pay for full coverage of pharmaceutical, only partial.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2024, 10:52 PM   #18010
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

So, if I'm a business owner in Alberta, my cost of employee benefits are going to be higher than in other provinces, since I'd have to keep paying for these coverages in my benefits plan...do I have that right?

Also, it always makes me smh when I see issues around funding women's birth control (which is more than just preventing pregnancies), but vasectomies are covered by AHS
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2024, 08:19 AM   #18011
Canadianman
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzle View Post
Haha... Alberta gonna Alberta

https://globalnews.ca/news/10316372/...armacare-plan/

If Alberta asks for the per capita funding in cash, I hope the federal govt tells them to shove it.

Typical cowardly decision made by a government filled with right-wing, religious ideologues.


Maybe we will wise up in time for the next election?
Canadianman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canadianman For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2024, 08:22 AM   #18012
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadianman View Post
Typical cowardly decision made by a government filled with right-wing, religious ideologues.


Maybe we will wise up in time for the next election?
LOL. Uh huh.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2024, 08:28 AM   #18013
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadianman View Post
Typical cowardly decision made by a government filled with right-wing, religious ideologues.


Maybe we will wise up in time for the next election?
No. We're ####ed!
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2024, 08:42 AM   #18014
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Not that I want to defend the statement or decision and I definitely don't know much about the existing program but Alberta already provides coverage for people without workplace benefits via Blue Cross. It could be possible that instead of implementing/joining a new national program it is just easier to continue to offer Blue Cross. The per capital funding request could potentially be used to boost the benefits available under Blue Cross or reduce/offset the premiums for the program.
Kind of yes and no. Not only continue to offer blue cross but make it more expensive. The ultimate goal of this government is privatized healthcare, even if it takes baby steps.

Sure they can opt-in to daycare but pharmacare and dentalcare is a bridge too far.

Cecil is right, when all fails, they'll blame it on the poor and lazy people always getting handouts.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2024, 08:57 AM   #18015
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Not that I want to defend the statement or decision and I definitely don't know much about the existing program but Alberta already provides coverage for people without workplace benefits via Blue Cross. It could be possible that instead of implementing/joining a new national program it is just easier to continue to offer Blue Cross. The per capital funding request could potentially be used to boost the benefits available under Blue Cross or reduce/offset the premiums for the program.
Have you ever looked at Blue Cross coverage? It's horse ####, and not worth paying for if you have any health issues at all. $1500 yearly drug limit and $25 co-pays per prescription for $118 a month premiums for 2 people. There is a reason people are clamoring for a national Pharmacare plan, and it sure isn't because Blue Cross is awesome.


EDITED to correct monthly cost.

Last edited by Fuzz; 02-26-2024 at 09:14 AM.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2024, 09:03 AM   #18016
belsarius
First Line Centre
 
belsarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cranbrook
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Have you ever looked at Blue Cross coverage? It's horse ####, and not worth paying for if you have any health issues at all. $1500 yearly drug limit and $25 co-pays per prescription for $350 a month premiums for 2 people. There is a reason people are clamoring for a national Pharmacare plan, and it sure isn't because Blue Cross is awesome.
And this also goes back to a point made about how Quebec gets per capita funding for some programs. Usually in those cases Quebec already has a program in place that is at least equal to if not better than what the Federal plan is. Daycare is a prime example where Quebec already offered sub $10/day daycare.

If Alberta wants to opt out AND get the funding, they need to show how the PEOPLE of Alberta are already getting a better deal... and as you just showed, we are not.
__________________
@PR_NHL
The @NHLFlames are the first team to feature four players each with 50+ points within their first 45 games of a season since the Penguins in 1995-96 (Ron Francis, Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Tomas Sandstrom).

Fuzz - "He didn't speak to the media before the election, either."
belsarius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to belsarius For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2024, 09:07 AM   #18017
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Have you ever looked at Blue Cross coverage? It's horse ####, and not worth paying for if you have any health issues at all. $1500 yearly drug limit and $25 co-pays per prescription for $350 a month premiums for 2 people. There is a reason people are clamoring for a national Pharmacare plan, and it sure isn't because Blue Cross is awesome.
This says it is $63.50 per month or $118 for a family which seems pretty reasonable to me.
https://www.alberta.ca/non-group-cov...nthly-premiums
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2024, 09:14 AM   #18018
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
This says it is $63.50 per month or $118 for a family which seems pretty reasonable to me.
https://www.alberta.ca/non-group-cov...nthly-premiums
Sorry, you are correct, I was looking at the 3 month statement. But the coverage is not very good, which is why it is so cheap.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2024, 09:31 AM   #18019
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

And seriously, this is the government who #### away $100 million on their last pharmaceutical purchase. These ####ing idiots? Ya, hey, that'll work out just fine.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2024, 09:35 AM   #18020
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Spend $70 million + on dicey Turkish Tylenol that no one ended up using. Say no to formalized national pharmacare plan for contraception and diabetes drugs that could help thousands of Albertans - especially without insurance - because it is a lefty idea.

Winning must be so tiring.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy