07-14-2021, 10:51 PM
|
#161
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Reppin' the C in BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
We do indeed.
So what in that data tells us he would do this?
|
Definitely f it up
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
__________________
"There are no asterisks in this life, only scoreboards." - Ari Gold
12 13 14 2 34
|
|
|
07-14-2021, 10:52 PM
|
#162
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly06Cup
Hot Take:
Trade Tanev after his resurgent season while his value is high.
Trade Gio at the deadline for some valuable picks.
|
This would be the smart move.
This will not be the move.
I just think this team is in such a stupid position.
They want to win. They just hired a short-term coach (apparently) to maximize their short-term ability to win (...while being a non-playoff team), and hey they're about to lose their best defenceman.
What a stupid position to be in.
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-14-2021, 10:53 PM
|
#163
|
First Line Centre
|
Being a sentimental fan ended for me the day Jarome Iginla was traded. If the Flames can rid themselves of the most popular player in franchise history then I’m okay with letting Gio go. No doubt he’s done great things for the organization and should be recognized when the time is right. However, this is not the time. The Flames need to be focussed on asset management and as a GM you need to be able to separate the business and loyalty aspect. I hope management does the right thing even if it’s the hard thing.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ferarri For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-14-2021, 10:55 PM
|
#164
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Conquering the world one 7-11 at a time
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
…I thought we had this sorted?
Buy him out. Re-sign him. Bada bing!
|
I actually don't hate this idea. If Gio was willing to make a deal with the team to take a buyout then re-sign with the Flames after the expansion draft on a 1 or 2 year deal at less AAV, it could work for everyone. Gio (depending on the dollar amount) wouldn't be out any actual money, and in fact may come out ahead. The Flames would potentially gain cap space and with Gio becoming a UFA my understanding is he wouldn't be subject to the expansion draft. Maybe it's naive and of course it's easy for me to suggest while playing with someone else's money, but if Gio really wants to be in Calgary and the Flames really want to stay, it could be the sort of 'out of the box" solution that just might fit.
__________________
"There will be a short outage tonight sometime between 11:00PM and 1:00AM as network upgrades are performed. Please do not panic and overthrow society. Thank you."
|
|
|
07-14-2021, 11:12 PM
|
#165
|
First Line Centre
|
While I would be fine with the Flames using a 3rd-7th round pick to retain Giordano, I doubt that’ll be enough based on Friedman’s reporting of how high Francis has set the prices. In that case, I think the Flames ought to expose Gio and let him be selected or trade Gio for a reduced price if they can.
|
|
|
07-14-2021, 11:14 PM
|
#166
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Don’t know about you guys but I have enough of Gio. We certainly lose something if they take him but it’s no big loss to me. This franchise needs a major surgery. Of course it won’t happen with these people running the team
|
|
|
07-14-2021, 11:27 PM
|
#167
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanna Sniper
Just controlling the narrative so they can say "we tried every scenario to keep our captain"
|
I am hoping it's this.
He helps you next year maybe, but the flexibility of his 6.75 probably serves the team better longer term. It's time to prepare for the next chapter.
|
|
|
07-14-2021, 11:41 PM
|
#168
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: CALGARY!
|
Do we even have to protect anyone? I would expose the entire team. Not a single player I would even care to protect and keep. As far as I’m concerned, everyone is up for grabs.
__________________
Stanley Cup - 1989
Clarence Campbell Trophy - 1986, 1989, 2004
Presidents Trophy - 1988, 1989
William Jennings Trophy - 2006
|
|
|
07-14-2021, 11:43 PM
|
#169
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: 1000 miles from nowhere
|
Please don’t waste any assets. We do not have enough assets as it is.
I am not even convinced that Seattle would select Gio if he is exposed.
Love the player, and I respect everything he has done for this team, and for this city. But we will be losing an asset to Seattle. If that asset is 38 years old, it is not the worst case scenario.
__________________
____________________________________________
|
|
|
07-14-2021, 11:45 PM
|
#170
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Familia
Do we even have to protect anyone? I would expose the entire team. Not a single player I would even care to protect and keep. As far as I’m concerned, everyone is up for grabs.
|
Haha.
On a day of emotionally overwrought takes here, yours is the best so far.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to blender For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-15-2021, 12:01 AM
|
#171
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The real "Cowtown"
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Do the Flames face any penalties if Gio comes out and says "I will retire if selected by Seattle", even if it is fake threat?
|
I'm surprised no one has thought to respond to this.
This seems like a really simple solution. If I was in Giordano's shoes and I truly only wanted to play for the Flames, I would absolutely make a statement about retirement if selected by Seattle. I had a very similar question written up, but I thought I would first see if it's already been discussed and found your lone, unanswered question.
Here it is: If Gio really wants to stay a Flame for his entire career, couldn't he simply say that he'll retire if Seattle picks him in the expansion draft? He is at the perfect age for people to not legitimately question a statement like that.
This seems like a simple way to "protect" 7-4 instead of 7-3 and if Tampa can get away with icing a team like that in the playoffs I'm not sure anyone would bat an eye at the Flames.
Maybe I'm unaware of some kind of rule that's in place to prevent this?
|
|
|
07-15-2021, 12:06 AM
|
#172
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cowtown
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CF84
I'm surprised no one has thought to respond to this.
This seems like a really simple solution. If I was in Giordano's shoes and I truly only wanted to play for the Flames, I would absolutely make a statement about retirement if selected by Seattle. I had a very similar question written up, but I thought I would first see if it's already been discussed and found your lone, unanswered question.
Here it is: If Gio really wants to stay a Flame for his entire career, couldn't he simply say that he'll retire if Seattle picks him in the expansion draft? He is at the perfect age for people to not legitimately question a statement like that.
This seems like a simple way to "protect" 7-4 instead of 7-3 and if Tampa can get away with icing a team like that in the playoffs I'm not sure anyone would bat an eye at the Flames.
Maybe I'm unaware of some kind of rule that's in place to prevent this?
|
I think the league would force the flames to protect him and expose someone else. Not sure it would work the same as Perry in this situation.
__________________
|
|
|
07-15-2021, 12:07 AM
|
#173
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Familia
Do we even have to protect anyone? I would expose the entire team. Not a single player I would even care to protect and keep. As far as I’m concerned, everyone is up for grabs.
|
Um, yes.
The half a dozen or so players that still possess value in a trade scenario are worth not exposing only to be snatched up for free.
Just cause we had a frustrating season and the community isn't teeming with hope doesn't mean you neglect the business and asset management side of maintaining your roster.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-15-2021, 12:21 AM
|
#174
|
Franchise Player
|
He shouldn't even be in the position to make the decision to keep or not keep Giordano at this point but since our ownership is MIA, here we are.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-15-2021, 12:40 AM
|
#175
|
GOAT!
|
Trading partner critera:
- Gio has to agree to be traded there
- They have to have cap room
- They have to be in a position to be able to benefit from a rental
- They have to have be able to protect him from the expansion draft
- They have to have something we would accept in return
Even with all that, the number one priority should be to trade him, so we don't have to worry about protecting him or giving something else up to be able to keep him.
|
|
|
07-15-2021, 12:56 AM
|
#177
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheva #7
Isn't Kylington still a tirefire defensively?
|
He has been working on this part of his game (to the determent of his offensive game) for the last three years. He is not worse than Valimaki has shown last year, and is actually about average.
The advantage that Kylington has is that he can speed back and cover any gaffs that he makes. Hanifin is fast, but Kylington is another level. If he is given a little confidence and regains his offensive form, he could be a steal for Seattle. I'm sure that Francis knows this, and if he can get (say) a second round pick (to save Gio) and Kylington, I think that he would be thrilled.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
07-15-2021, 12:57 AM
|
#178
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Couldn't Gio threaten retirement and take a coaching role with the flames for a year?
|
|
|
07-15-2021, 01:00 AM
|
#179
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
He shouldn't even be in the position to make the decision to keep or not keep Giordano at this point but since our ownership is MIA, here we are.
|
Based on the way Murray Edwards runs his other businesses I have a hard time believing he is MIA on this decision. He will make this call like he made the call to sign Neal/Brouwer, trade Iginla, etc.
|
|
|
07-15-2021, 01:41 AM
|
#180
|
First Line Centre
|
Buy him out.
Re-sign him for 2 yrs after the expansion draft?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 AM.
|
|