So whats next for Donald Trump?

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Besides, Sureloss, everyone in here is utterly useless. Bye bye.

Off you go

[Blaster86]

We got a live one!

[theTrumanShow]

Originally Posted by Sliver

Okay, here's the press release from Dominion's homepage:



What specifically on there supports your claim?

LOL.

Criminal website: we committed no crimes

Everyone: oh ok

...Ownership, which looks like it has been taken down. 10% Pelosi, 10% Clinton Foundation, 10% Frank Guistra (Clinton Foundation)...but whatever, they said they are good. SMH

[You Need a Thneed]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Did you use snopes for these references of "100% verifiable" charges? You do realize anyone can sue anyone for anything at any given time, and most of the time its baseless. Kind of like Russian Collusion, Kavanaugh smear, Stormy Daniels, etc.

Since you appear to be too lazy, here's the (starting) list, from earlier in this thread:

https://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpo...1&postcount=67

Those aren't made up charges - Trump has already been found guilty of those things, and was impeached.

There are many more similar things.

[Scroopy Noopers]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Correct, and that was just 1 state. There is going to be 10 states in dispute and yet the media declares victory?

.... because the others were decided and Florida was to decide the presidency. I don’t understand your point.

Bush won by 537 votes! Not 20,000.

[theTrumanShow]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

LOL.

Criminal website: we committed no crimes

Everyone: oh ok

...Ownership, which looks like it has been taken down. 10% Pelosi, 10% Clinton Foundation, 10% Frank Guistra (Clinton Foundation)...but whatever, they said they are good. SMH

Trump's legal team has referenced this on several channels: MSNBC, FOX, not my secret underground "right wing" websites and chat rooms.

[GreenLantern2814]

Originally Posted by flamesfan1297

I have to agree with him though, there's no doubt IMO that there was widespread voter fraud this election. I'm sure this is a bit every election just not as prominent as this time

Voter fraud occurs at a rate of about 0.0025%.

How widespread are you alleging? (You don’t have an answer)

How was the fraud perpetrated? (You don’t have an answer)

How was the fraud able to circumvent multiple decentralized elections with different rules to generate a coordinated result? (You don’t have an answer)

Who is at the top of the fraud pyramid directing traffic? Is it the DNC? Is it Biden? Is it the CIA? Is it the FBI? (You don’t have an answer)

Is it a vast conspiracy whereby 75.6 million American citizens from all walks of life decided that four years of President Attention Whore governing by tweet was enough, and if they all sent in one ballot each indicating their support for Joe Biden, that would be enough to make him go away? (Yes).

[Blaster86]

Criminals that colluded with foreign powers: No Collusion!

[opendoor]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

If you have a point to make, make it. Telling people to google a company name, and then getting huffy is not very productive. So what is your point? Maybe link to something?

But that's exactly how QAnon works. People come up with insane theories based on flimsy bits of evidence and then say "Do your research" in an attempt to fill the giant chasm in their logic.

[Sliver]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

LOL.

Criminal website: we committed no crimes

Everyone: oh ok

...Ownership, which looks like it has been taken down. 10% Pelosi, 10% Clinton Foundation, 10% Frank Guistra (Clinton Foundation)...but whatever, they said they are good. SMH

lol, I literally went to the website you told us to go to.

[krynski]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Trump's legal team has referenced this on several channels: MSNBC, FOX, not my secret underground "right wing" websites and chat rooms.

Do you by chance "Fact Check" anything that is said by the political party of your following, or do you blindly believe?

[theTrumanShow]

Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed

Since you appear to be too lazy, here's the (starting) list, from earlier in this thread:

https://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpo...1&postcount=67

Those aren't made up charges - Trump has already been found guilty of those things, and was impeached.

There are many more similar things.

He was "impeached" by a Democrat Congress, for literally nothing. Literally the day "impeachment" ended, covid started and impeachment ended. Outcome, it was all a joke.

Bigger question is, why is Trump such a treat to people even out of office?

Magically he is somehow responsible for a virus that came from China, but Trudeau isn't right?

[Yamer]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Besides, Sureloss, everyone in here is utterly useless. Bye bye.

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Did you use snopes for these references of "100% verifiable" charges? You do realize anyone can sue anyone for anything at any given time, and most of the time its baseless. Kind of like Russian Collusion, Kavanaugh smear, Stormy Daniels, etc.

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Correct, and that was just 1 state. There is going to be 10 states in dispute and yet the media declares victory?

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

LOL.

Criminal website: we committed no crimes

Everyone: oh ok

...Ownership, which looks like it has been taken down. 10% Pelosi, 10% Clinton Foundation, 10% Frank Guistra (Clinton Foundation)...but whatever, they said they are good. SMH

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Trump's legal team has referenced this on several channels: MSNBC, FOX, not my secret underground "right wing" websites and chat rooms.

The Long Goodbye.

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

He was "impeached" by a Democrat Congress, for literally nothing. Literally the day "impeachment" ended, covid started and impeachment ended. Outcome, it was all a joke.

Bigger question is, why is Trump such a treat to people even out of office?

Magically he is somehow responsible for a virus that came from China, but Trudeau isn't right?

What the #### is wrong with you?

He is responsible for management of the response to the virus

And is a laughingstock

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Trump's legal team has referenced this on several channels: MSNBC, FOX, not my secret underground "right wing" websites and chat rooms.

Oh, well if our mistake! We should have been going to Rudy for legal advice since day one. I mean if Rudy says it, it must be true!

[Scroopy Noopers]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

He was "impeached" by a Democrat Congress, for literally nothing. Literally the day "impeachment" ended, covid started and impeachment ended. Outcome, it was all a joke.

Bigger question is, why is Trump such a treat to people even out of office?

Magically he is somehow responsible for a virus that came from China, but Trudeau isn't right?

Impeached for literal crimes, and then the Senate openly said they weren’t pursuing it. Impeachment ended.

Of course Trudeau is.... in Canada. The country which he governs.

[theTrumanShow]

Originally Posted by krynski

Do you by chance "Fact Check" anything that is said by the political party of your following, or do you blindly believe?

I have watched the mainstream media such as yourself. Several times by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell (part of Trumps' legal team), they have been on what you would consider to be reputable media stating these "facts". So if I believe Biden won on MSNBC, should I not believe everything else said there? Do explain?

[Cali Panthers Fan]

Oy vey...

Yup, on the ignore list you go. Even my brother, who is bipolar and clings to conspiracy theories at the drop of a hat, would tell you that everything you're yammering about is nonsense.

It concerns me greatly that so many people don't understand how impossible it is to have a vast cover up when they present these conspiracy theories. Utterly astounding.

[flylock shox]

Originally Posted by Huntingwhale

Him and his cronies absolutely 100% need to be held accountable. I cant believe some people are actually suggesting to let things be, let him simply fade into obscurity. A bunch of old rich white men in positions of power being allowed to get away with what they did would be such an "American" thing to do. That mistake was made after Bush v.2 and his administration weren't pursued for war crimes and here we are.

I don't believe it sets a bad precedent like some suggested. There's a difference between wanting to jail someone like Obama for not agreeing with his policies vs wanting to hold accountable a guy like Trump who clearly committed crimes while in office. While most of the world is relieved Biden won, there is still a lot of talk from other countries moving forward without being dependent on the US. Holding that administration accountable would go a long way to rebuilding that trust.

I too am relieved, but know full well the same damn thing can happen again in 4 years except this time with a GOP administration that is a lot more competent. What's to stop the next round of GOPs from simply reversing what Biden does and once again trying to consolidate power for their own personal gain? Going after Trump and his cronies would go a long way to relieving some of those concerns and would give a definitive statement to the world that what happened is not acceptable and steps will be taken to ensure it doesn't happen again.

There is precedent of other countries holding their politicians accountable. Just because it hurts his followers feelings doesn't mean it shouldn't happen. I would be disgusted if him and his cronies are allowed to walk away like nothing happened and would brace myself in 4 years for the second round of this BS.

This is an important post and perspective. I'm bumping it for emphasis and so it doesn't get lost in the dum-dummery of the past couple of pages.


In my view, it is essential that justice not only be done, but be seen to be done. This means that not only are crimes investigated, but they are prosecuted in the public view. Moreover, it means that those prosecutions can't be show trials - there should be no political influence or attachment to them: they should simply be allowed to unfold on their merits.



The US can and should allow these investigations to unfold. Putting a stop to them for political reasons is every bit as bad as initiating/conducting them for political reasons.


Even if there are not grounds to prosecute in most instances, there should be a public airing of what went on during the last administration. In Canada, we would use public inquiries for this purpose. They're toothless, but they're very good at bringing out the truth.



Whatever happens, the public needs to know what wrongs were committed by the last administration, especially if any are criminal in nature.

[TheIronMaiden]

Originally Posted by theTrumanShow

Why would I waste my time? Just google Dominion Voting Systems. I am literally telling you where to look. Read who has ownership in it and where it is used. I know it’s work, and you won’t be getting your CERB cheque, but it’s worth your time if you actually care. We all know you won’t because you are blinded by your own political bias, even if the truth is right in front of you.

The Dominion Voting System is a interesting rabbit hole. That said, I don't think it lines up with your conspiracy that well. "Dominion Voting Systems reached approximately 71 million voters in 1,635 jurisdictions in 2016." but of course it wasn't fraud when these machines were used to elect a Republican president.

https://www.accesswire.com/471912/Vo...-Contributions


I expect that you are talking about these machines in Georgia, where they are widely used ( but who actually knows because you just bring up the name of the machine and not where it is used). It was Brian Kemp (R) who bought some $150m of these voting machines, and appointed an ES&S lobbyist as his deputy chief of staff.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...r-registration

Yeah these machines are heavily scrutinized and rightfully so. But suggesting this is the innerworkings of the 'left media' and the democrats is not true, and if you took the time to present specific examples you would know this.