Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2017, 11:18 PM   #161
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

The Oilers aren’t going to do so well once team defenders gel a bit.

The commentators after the game said it right - “one man offense”.

I don’t think a single other Oiler generated anything dangerous, in the 2 and a bit periods that I watched.

The Flames need to be better, yes. But that was a close game for most of it. The Oilers got a few more bounces. A few roster tweaks required too.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:18 PM   #162
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theinfinitejar View Post
Jesus. I know it's one game and all but that's pretty ####ing stark.
How Backlund had a positive corsi differential against McDavid is unreal in itself.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:18 PM   #163
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Our centre situation is quickly becoming the death of us. "He's a centre, he will be groomed that way and we won't deviate".

Okay great, but you're also saying we're going for it now, while Bennett and Jankowski aren't able to serve us because you won't let them see the light of a top six role while bringing them along properly.

Meanwhile other teams make the decision to move centres to wing all the time. Trust me, I get the reasoning, but you have to have the flexibility when you have a possible four top six centres just kind of sitting there at the same time as you scratch your head trying to fill top six wing positions.

It's utterly frustrating to watch.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:18 PM   #164
flame4life
Farm Team Player
 
flame4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Exp:
Default

Came for the over reaction .... left satisfied.

I get it was a stinky game in all aspects, but I thought our goaltending was solid. I certainly didn't expect to go undefeated. I will give it a few more games before I pull out the pitchforks.

I trust we have not seen the last of the roster moves, and Jagr's timeline for getting in the game may well be accelerated. He probably would have been the best player tonight for us I feel he had played, which is a disappointment on our core players.

I am looking for a lot better showing on Saturday,to ring in our home schedule,
flame4life is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flame4life For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:19 PM   #165
DropIt
Franchise Player
 
DropIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Wow, Brouwer spent more time against McDavid than Backlund did?
Whoops
You realize that Edmonton was at home, and had last change right?
DropIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:20 PM   #166
azzarish
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Expected a loss and received a loss.

Hate to say it but they are a superior team to us. The difference was clear as day. They walked in all night and we never looked like scoring once.
azzarish is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to azzarish For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:20 PM   #167
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

The game was in Edmonton so Gulutzan couldn't line match. No clue why Brouwer was getting so much ice time though especially to start periods and at the end of the game. Stick him on the 4th line and leave him there.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
FireGilbert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:21 PM   #168
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
I thought Bennett played really well. If put in the right position he could have a great year. I know the thought is Jagr will play with him but I don't think a slow puch possession guy is good for him. I'd put him 1RW personally.
This, a million times this. Let's end this "centres will only play centre" madness and create one strong top line. Ferland is a neat story, but he's simply not a top line winger.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:21 PM   #169
mikeecho
Powerplay Quarterback
 
mikeecho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Exp:
Default

I can't wait for Burke to go ape#### on Gulutzans system forcing him to simplify it. I'll know when it happens because the team will talk about how a few beers on a train ride is what actually happened.
mikeecho is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mikeecho For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:21 PM   #170
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Well...let's see how they change things up. Top players didn't do their thing. But bottom guys need to at least hold their own. Stajan was working his tail off in the corners. But Brouwer. I've seen enough of him. Brouwer knows he is about to be demoted to the 4th line and he plays like that?
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:22 PM   #171
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
I'm not calling for GG's head. He got the team into the playoffs last year and it's only one game in but he has to change tactics.

Flames are not a chip and chase team (of course you have to do it sometimes) they need to carry the puck in. Gaudreau is not going to retrieve pucks on the dump, he has to carry it into the zone and be creative.

I feel GG has taken the creativity out because he's afraid of turnovers at the blue line. Backlund's line may have been one of the better lines tonight but it wasn't a great game by them. Backlund can execute zone entries- that's when you see Tkachuk gaining possession down low.

It was so easy on Talbot because CGY was never dangerous. They kept doing the same stuff and it doesn't work.

EDM walked into the offensive zone all night, they rarely dumped it. CGY could not breakout to save their lives.

Smith was the only positive. GG won't change tactics but it's clear this team won't play to make plays but instead play afraid to make mistakes.

Jagr rarely dumps the puck but he might get coached into it. Hopefully the opposite happens and the rest oft the players take after him and some creativity spreads through the lineup.
the thing is- and it's been mentioned already but after watching that it should be repeated... if you're intention is to play a dump and chase game, then you have to hit or get hit.

But you can't dump it in and then hope the other team won't go near the puck.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #172
theinfinitejar
Powerplay Quarterback
 
theinfinitejar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
How Backlund had a positive corsi differential against McDavid is unreal in itself.
Mikael Backlund is very good.

Troy Brouwer is a ####ing bum.
theinfinitejar is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to theinfinitejar For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #173
Kybb79
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Lethbridge Alberta
Exp:
Default

Brouwer=Brodie
Kybb79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #174
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love View Post
Some of it has to do with coaching schemes. We sit back in the neutral zone and allow McDavid or whoever to catch us flatfooted as they blow by us and gain the zone. While on the other hand, they forecheck us into oblivion and force us to ice the puck and make bad passes which lead to turnovers.

GG has us trying to play a rough and tumble dump and chase game like our weak and slow forwards have a chance at retrieving the puck.
I hate to say it, but I still see as many defensive breakdowns as there were when Hartley was coaching, and this defensive core is way more mobile and (on paper) superior defensively. They also look neutered on the offensive side of things. I thought this way through the majority of last season as well - way too many high danger chances.

You look at the Oilers with their (on paper) lousier defensive core, and they allowed less chances and less high danger chances than the Flames did last season. I am hoping that a chunk of that difference was due to the terrible start.

This team is built to be a strong defensive and a strong transitioning team. I see way too many breakdowns (tonight and for a lot of last season) as well as too much time getting hemmed in their own zone.

Execution is not there regularly enough, or the system isn't quite right (don't know which). Not to be misunderstood here - not clamoring for coaching change, but the coaches need to sit down and figure out why breakdowns are happening so often.

In what world does THAT Oilers' defence perform better than the Flames'? Even throughout last season? Something needs adjusting. The Oilers dominated the Flames defensively, and that is (for me) the most disappointing part of the loss.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #175
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Earth to Gulutzan:

Caleb‏ @CLIB542
McDavid vs Brouwer
TOI - 4:01
CF - 20
CA - 4

McDavid vs Backlund
TOI - 3:06
CF - 2
CA - 5
That line iced it a number of times and everytime McDavid's line came over and this is the result. Nothing GG can do about that.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #176
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Ok. I'm on board. Bring him back. Hello Viking, we're looking for Darryl.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to memphusk For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #177
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireGilbert View Post
The game was in Edmonton so Gulutzan couldn't line match. No clue why Brouwer was getting so much ice time though especially to start periods and at the end of the game. Stick him on the 4th line and leave him there.
My only hope is that there truly is a Brouwer trade in the works and we were trying to pretend he's a big minute guy for us.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #178
---Hatrick---
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Red Deer
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
Glen Gulutzan is a ####ing moron. There was no way the Flames were coming back or even scoring a goal but he proceeds to gift wrap the hat trick to tank boy. ####. Does Gully have a pulse on the game at all??????

What a complete jackass.
You actually think that Gulutzan shouldn't have pulled the goalie and they shouldn't have atleast made a last ditch attempt to score a couple late goals?
I know the team played like s*** but what kind of message would that have sent to the team?
__________________
It was in.
---Hatrick--- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ---Hatrick--- For This Useful Post:
Old 10-04-2017, 11:23 PM   #179
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Man... the Oilers' nut gargling from the Sportsnet broadcasters was especially bad tonight. How come a regi9nal station that is supposed to cater to both teams only likes blowing one of them?
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2017, 11:24 PM   #180
united
#1 Goaltender
 
united's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Earth to Gulutzan:

Caleb‏ @CLIB542
McDavid vs Brouwer
TOI - 4:01
CF - 20
CA - 4

McDavid vs Backlund
TOI - 3:06
CF - 2
CA - 5
And like two of those minutes were because of Gulutzan's bizarre obsession with constantly rolling out whatever line Brouwer is on to start road periods. Did it all last year, too - the other coach immediately matches with their best line.
Did it to start two periods tonight and both resulted in icings followed by McDavid's line battering them.
__________________
"I think the eye test is still good, but analytics can sure give you confirmation: what you see...is that what you really believe?"
Scotty Bowman, 0 NHL games played
united is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to united For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy