Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-12-2014, 08:48 AM   #161
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth View Post
How the heck did Moulson's goal for the 4th against even count? What a joke.
Lol really? That wasn't even a question. There was no kicking motion and it even looked like it deflected off his stick before going into the net.

Considering a Sabres goal was called back on a REALLY close high-stick after about a fifteen second review and Monahan was gifted a goal after not getting a blatant interference penalty, I wouldn't be complaining about the reffing too much.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 12-12-2014, 10:30 AM   #162
Cobra Jet
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
A game like this has me less worried than those come from behind on the third period wins. That's not a recipe for future success.
Thats exactly what last night was, the Flames down or tied for most of regulation minus the last minute comeback and overtime win.

Jonas played great, the break away save plus the saves in the last minute got his team the W for sure.
Cobra Jet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2014, 10:34 AM   #163
Cobra Jet
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
Lol really? That wasn't even a question. There was no kicking motion and it even looked like it deflected off his stick before going into the net.

Considering a Sabres goal was called back on a REALLY close high-stick after about a fifteen second review and Monahan was gifted a goal after not getting a blatant interference penalty, I wouldn't be complaining about the reffing too much.
Wasn't close at all. The stick was a couple feet above the crossbar. And the kick (deflection) looked intentional and it appeared that he moved his foot (kick) to direct that puck in. I can see why they called it a goal but it was garbage non the less.

Buffalo is terrible. They have a zero percent chance of winning the cup in the next five years.
Cobra Jet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2014, 10:46 AM   #164
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra Jet View Post
Wasn't close at all. The stick was a couple feet above the crossbar. And the kick (deflection) looked intentional and it appeared that he moved his foot (kick) to direct that puck in. I can see why they called it a goal but it was garbage non the less.

Buffalo is terrible. They have a zero percent chance of winning the cup in the next five years.
Haha. No. I understand you're upset that you lost but 'a couple feet' is a gross exaggeration. A player is allowed to intentionally re-direct a puck in with their foot as long as they don't kick it in, which is exactly what happened. To call it garbage is sour grapes -- be mad at the Flames team that stood there and gave Ennis all the time in the world to make the pass to him.

Also, I've been here a while and am very far past getting riled up by dumb pointless pot-shots about my favorite team. That wasn't even a very good one!
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 12-12-2014, 10:47 AM   #165
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
Considering a Sabres goal was called back on a REALLY close high-stick after about a fifteen second review
The blade of his stick was at his shoulders when the puck made contact. Foligno is 6'3". The crossbar is 4'. There's no way it was even close to being a good goal.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2014, 10:54 AM   #166
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
Haha. No. I understand you're upset that you lost but 'a couple feet' is a gross exaggeration. A player is allowed to intentionally re-direct a puck in with their foot as long as they don't kick it in, which is exactly what happened. To call it garbage is sour grapes -- be mad at the Flames team that stood there and gave Ennis all the time in the world to make the pass to him.

Also, I've been here a while and am very far past getting riled up by dumb pointless pot-shots about my favorite team. That wasn't even a very good one!
I actually thought the high stick goal was a good goal and Moulson's goal was kicking motion... So, it pretty much offsets.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2014, 12:03 PM   #167
DOOM
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I actually thought the high stick goal was a good goal and Moulson's goal was kicking motion... So, it pretty much offsets.
lol? It was a highstick, clear as day.
DOOM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2014, 02:38 PM   #168
taxbuster
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Actually, I think the coaches "like" a bit of a losing streak....I've heard it said often that when a team gets on a winning roll they stop listening to the coaches. You can see with the Flames if you look over the past 5-6 games that they've stopped doing some of the things that made them successful. As far as I can tell these were:

- short passes in the D-zone, followed by a long - accurate - pass to a forward in the neutral zone mixed with the occasional long stretch pass; they're not finding space because ....
- close gap support; they've started to drift too far away from each other, making it easy for other teams to get turnovers on passes that are too long or slow
- timing and tape-to-tape passes; they seem to be feeling forced right now and their passes are far less clean than they were - are other teams figuring them out?
- always facing down-ice, rather than up-ice; when they were doing well, they were facing up-ice a lot, picking up passes on the fly, and just moving FAST afterwards; they're looking backward too much right now.

Yes, we've had a few crappy goals scored against us, and a bit of bad reffing etc. - all that stuff evens out pretty much over the year. Just not getting bounces today - but we got lots a few weeks ago.

It was a frustrating game to watch - guys seemed a bit slow and awkward - a bit out of position. Good work for the coaches to hammer at!!
taxbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy