Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2014, 01:29 AM   #161
Crumpy-Gunt
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

I wouldnt be down with trading Sven+ for to move up 4 spots. Wayyy too early to give up on Sven. IMO Bennett is the best forward because his ceiling is higher than Reinhart and Ekblad is easily the best D. It comes down to what you want, how you value the players and what you are willing to give up.

I think we can really make the 4th pick (if we stay there) count without trading up. Letting us keep our top prospects and have 4 more picks in the top 93 selections. That would be more exciting for me than taking one of the top 2 players. You never know what could be available in rounds 2 and 3. They are amazingly valuable looking back at past drafts.

We have our 1st, 2 seconds, 2 thirds a 6th and a 7th.

Im stoked. I really hope we dont trade up and if we do - it better not be for too much. (IE 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 1st and 2 2nds, or 1st and a top prospect)
Crumpy-Gunt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Crumpy-Gunt For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 01:30 AM   #162
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Florida wins! Phew, we stay 4th.

Inspired by Calgary4Life

I see this based upon my own biases (some of which happen to be similar to Burke's biases) and from what I've seen in limited action:

Tier 1
Ekblad

Tier 2
Bennett
Reinhart

Tier 3
Dal Colle
Ritchie
Draisaitl

From some comments passed on from that luncheon it sounds like the staff might be a bit divided on Ekblad vs Bennett vs Reinhart? I suspect a lot of teams are having trouble getting consensus on these top 4-5 guys

Intriguing draft. Good chance someone unexpected is available at #4 if we stay there.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 01:34 AM   #163
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

If Edm wins, expect the lottery rules to change drastically next season.

Hoping and praying. But if we don't win, just stick with the 4th overall. We're guaranteed to get a Great player, regardless. I don't want to give up Sven just to move up 1-2 spots. NOT worth it for the very small jump in talent it would grant us.

Seeing the weapons we have on the forward ranks going into next season that could develop into top 6 impact players - Gaudreau, Monahan (1st line potential), Sven, Poirier, Granlund, even Colborne - I wouldn't mind taking Ekblad with the 1st overall if we win. He'll be our weapon from the back end and will shore up our top 3 with two solid pieces already in place.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 01:36 AM   #164
N-E-B
Franchise Player
 
N-E-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
If Edm wins, expect the lottery rules to change drastically next season.

Hoping and praying. But if we don't win, just stick with the 4th overall. We're guaranteed to get a Great player, regardless. I don't want to give up Sven just to move up 1-2 spots. NOT worth it for the very small jump in talent it would grant us.

Seeing the weapons we have on the forward ranks going into next season that could develop into top 6 impact players - Gaudreau, Monahan (1st line potential), Sven, Poirier, Granlund, even Colborne - I wouldn't mind taking Ekblad with the 1st overall if we win. He'll be our weapon from the back end and will shore up our top 3 with two solid pieces already in place.
I would give up Sven to move up ONLY if we can get Ekblad. I haven't given up on Sven but I think Ekblad is a franchise defenseman. But I agree with you otherwise. The forwards this year just aren't worth trading up for in my opinion.
N-E-B is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 01:38 AM   #165
Crumpy-Gunt
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

The only scenario i would trade up to take Ekblad - regardless of cost is if he is falling into the Oilers lap somehow ala Seth Jones OR if we hear they are in talks to trade up.

Im OK with not getting Ekblad. Im not OK with the Oilers getting the 2nd best ranked Dman from last years draft (Nurse), and the best one from this years draft. That would be a bit scary for me. But if anyone can ruin 2 top defensive prospects like Nurse and Ekblad - and even Klefbom - its deadmonton. How is a player supposed to develop defensively with hall, rnh, eberle and yakupov giving the puck away every second.
Crumpy-Gunt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Crumpy-Gunt For This Useful Post:
AC
Old 04-14-2014, 01:41 AM   #166
theoforever
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Giving up Sven to move 2 spots is a high price.
They would have to add another pick
theoforever is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to theoforever For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 01:45 AM   #167
TheKing
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Hardly any move up deals involve prospects. Why not our 1st and a 2nd and a 4-5th next year or something like that?
TheKing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheKing For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 02:27 AM   #168
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I could see Florida giving up their 1st for our 1st, 2nd and a 3rd/4th pick next season. Considering our second is an early pick, it'll definitely have value to a team above us. It may depend on who Florida values most in the top 5. If they're looking for a scoring winger (Dal Colle), or Ehlers, like Tallon mentioned before, then they are all but guaranteed to be there at 4th for them.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 03:56 AM   #169
UKflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
UKflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Exp:
Default

I agrre with those that think that Florida would be looking for players that can go into the line up now rather than prospects (or picks) that they will have to wait to develop. Reaquiring Luongo says to me that they want to take a big step forward next season.

I think we should stay ythe course and there is no need to trade up, we are going to get a good player at our current spot.
UKflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 05:49 AM   #170
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

LOL Torts is really owned by Bob Hartley. He probably stays awake at night planning his revenge. It gets good around the 1:50 minute mark.


Last edited by Vulcan; 04-14-2014 at 05:54 AM.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 06:02 AM   #171
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Took me 3 tries to get the Flames
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 06:10 AM   #172
Trailer Fire
First Line Centre
 
Trailer Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
Exp:
Default

1. Isles
2. Flames
3. Panthers
4. Hurricanes
5. Panthers
6. Sabres
7. Panthers
8. Panthers
9. Oilers
10. Oilers
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
Trailer Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 07:09 AM   #173
puckedoff
First Line Centre
 
puckedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

The Oilers finished with 10 fewer points than the Calgary Flames. Let that sink in. (77pts vs 67pts).
puckedoff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puckedoff For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 07:24 AM   #174
FakenHaken
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Florida wins! Phew, we stay 4th.

Inspired by Calgary4Life

I see this based upon my own biases (some of which happen to be similar to Burke's biases) and from what I've seen in limited action:

Tier 1
Ekblad

Tier 2
Bennett
Reinhart

Tier 3
Dal Colle
Ritchie
Draisaitl

From some comments passed on from that luncheon it sounds like the staff might be a bit divided on Ekblad vs Bennett vs Reinhart? I suspect a lot of teams are having trouble getting consensus on these top 4-5 guys

Intriguing draft. Good chance someone unexpected is available at #4 if we stay there.
Although it isn't how I voted, as I misinterpreted my bad. Your analysis is exactly how I see the tier's even in order with Tier 3. Although I see the Oilers going Draisaitl and it might free up a Bennett or Reinhart.

How my magic eight ball thinks it will go:

Buffalo wins lottery - Sam Bennett. Although Reinhart might be the smarter Hockey IQ, Sam Bennett isn't a dummy either from what I've read. So the intangible of win at all costs sways Buffalo.
Florida - Ekblad. There is always a need for a top 4 defensemen time will tell if that is 1 - 2 or 3 - 4.
Edmonton - Draisaitl. Big Center is something they actually lack next to a good defensemen. Has indicated a dream to be an Oiler. I think they need the bigger center more than Sam Reinhart. Who knows it is the Oilers after all.
Calgary - Sam Reinhart. BPA. Might not be as truculent as Sam Bennett but this kid has the tools and the tool box to go with it. Would love if my magic eight ball is right, but would love Bennett as well. You could flip Bennett with Reinhart it really is dependent on Buffalo I think.
FakenHaken is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FakenHaken For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 08:38 AM   #175
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

I'll be thrilled if Reinhart falls to the Flames at #4. Hope you're right, FakenHaken.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 08:41 AM   #176
Igster
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

nm
Igster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 08:46 AM   #177
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

i think there may be some debate amongst who goes where but it just seems that ekblad/reinhart/bennet will be in the top 3, regardless of order.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 08:49 AM   #178
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
i think there may be some debate amongst who goes where but it just seems that ekblad/reinhart/bennet will be in the top 3, regardless of order.
While I agree, last year every mock draft and scouting rankings I saw had Jones going in the top 3 (really, 1st or 2nd with McKinnon) with Barkov and Drouin rounding out the top 4.
Clever_Iggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2014, 08:54 AM   #179
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

lol, torts is an idiot.

Sure hope he keeps his job in vancouver cus he's done absolutely great taking a half decent roster and putting up one of the worst records in the NHL over the latter half of the season. He's such a great coach he'll blame it on the injuries.

Of course if he doesn't keep his job, i'd be interested to see if he's done in the league. He's too much of a loose cannon, no self control, who can't help but become a distraction to his team due to idiotic comments in the media (comments during olympics are a prime example of just how dumb his antics can get).

Enjoy the minors/europe torts, you won't be missed.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
Old 04-14-2014, 08:55 AM   #180
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
i think there may be some debate amongst who goes where but it just seems that ekblad/reinhart/bennet will be in the top 3, regardless of order.
I think because of his size and postion, similar to what we saw with Barkov last year, Draisatl could go top 3 as well.

I do think people are focusing a little too much on last year and Jones slipping, while overall the concensus is not how it goes Jones slipping seems to be more of an anomoly than the norm and the top 3-5 usually go in the first 3-5 picks most years.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy