Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Would you mind not act like you're a telepath?
Hits are a different discussion. If you want to open up a thread about what to do about dangerous hits in hockey, feel free.
As to why hits and fights are different: Hits are in the rules, fights are not. Simple as that really.
I believe that the game would be better if the rules were followed. I think the idea that hockey should be refereed by the players themselves outside the written rules is unhealthy, and propagates an unhealthy culture of physical play that makes the game less entertaining and dangerous in an unnecessary way.
I also think the idea that players "police themselves" gives the league an excuse to not properly crack down on violent play.
|
Less entertaining to who, you? Since I'm not a telepath I'm guessing neither are you so you are only speaking for yourself. I'm totally fine if fighting is phased out, as long as it's the players initiative. It's the knee-jerk reactions by some fans who think they know better than the people that actually live and play the game that I disagree with.
I understand that some people don't like fighting, that's fine, we all like different things. I just wish some wouldn't cloak their argument in player safety...it's disingenuous. How about getting rid of the carbon fiber sticks...Giordano and Stempniak most likely wouldn't be injured. Want to cut down on concussions? Have the players tighten their fracken chin straps on their helmets. Those changes alone would protect players more than getting rid of fighting. How about make the ice surface larger...players are bigger and faster, surely that would help. So many ways...