Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-24-2013, 12:44 PM   #161
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14 View Post
I don't. If we're not getting anything back that has even a remote chance of becoming a top player down the road, what is the point? A trade of our franchise player is supposed to kick start a rebuild here. A few mediocre pieces does not kick start anything.

IMO, at least one of the 2 or 3 pieces we get back will have top potential. Late 1st, blue chip prospect, top 6 forward. Otherwise there's no point.
I have a feeling we're just having an issue with semantics here. When I said a good (not great) prospect I mean it's unlikely any teams top 2 or 3 prospects are going to be in the deal. The Pens, for example, probably won't give up Bennett or Morrow. Boston probably won't give up Hamilton or Subban. Spooner might be a reach as well. You're more likely to get a prospect like Maata or Khoklachev (sp?) instead. Those two would still be head and shoulders above the majority of players in our system, but I wouldn't call them "blue-chip" prospects.
Goodlad is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Goodlad For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 12:45 PM   #162
Finegrind
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Calgary
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I only read the first 3 pages of this thread, but if this rumour is true, i am surprised that some of you are happy that Vancouver or NY Rangers are not on the list. For me i want as many teams on that list as possible. That does not mean they have to trade him to Vancouver but it could help with leverage against other teams. I wish the list was 10 -15 teams deep.
This may the best post in this thread.
Finegrind is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 12:47 PM   #163
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

I'm a huge Flames fan, and I will admit that I am also a fan of Iginla period. Somewhere over the course of the last 18 years he's turned me into a fan of his that extends beyond the jersey. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Flames fan first, but I also cheer for Iggy to succeed.

Regardless of the angle you take, Flames fan or Iggy fan, it will be a good thing if he gets traded. Don't get me wrong, a very sad day because it will be the end of a great era, but unfortunately one that will end with neither the Flames or Iggy accomplishing their goal of a cup in Calgary. But, a good day for both Flames and Iggy fans. For the Flames, getting the best return they can for Iggy is the right new start for this team, and for Iggy, a chance to reach his goal of a cup. It is truly a win win situation for both. Unfortunately, there is no longer synergy in the Flames / Iggy relationship, as neither can accomplish there goals if they stay together.

I will cheer for Iggy to win a cup this year, and be excited for the fresh start and the building of a new chance at the cup in Calgary.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 12:49 PM   #164
pylon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

I hope it's Boston.

I like Boston.
pylon is offline  
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to pylon For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 12:49 PM   #165
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyBeers View Post
Here is a thread from 3 years ago with a number of posters wanting Iginla traded then

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=89184

It is something that a lot of true Calgary Flames fans have wanted to see happen for a number of years.

So now 40 or 50 people is "a lot"?

Alrighty then.

The average fanon the street IMO never wanted to see this happen...ever. With good reason too.

The fact it has to happen at this point though, is still nothing to celebrate and i find it very confusing to suggest otherwise. The team will NOT be better without him. Hopefully, and its only hope at this point, Feaster doesnt completely screw things up on the return..something im not holding my breath on after his recent spate of incompetance.

There is nothing anywhere in this scenario to "celebrate" for anyone involved.
transplant99 is offline  
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 12:50 PM   #166
Yakbutter
Self-ban
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

I hope it's more than just Iginla being traded. It wouldn't make sense to ship our franchise player out of town and leave other good trade options (stempniak, cammy, kipper, bouw) stajan ect) on the rooster. Might as well go all in and sell off everyone that won't be a contributor in 3-4 years.
Yakbutter is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 12:53 PM   #167
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

after the most recent lockout I finally realized the players don't give a #### about the fans anyway. Enjoy the game and the skills of the players on the ice but as far as a personal attachment, these guys don't give a #### about you personally so don't get too attached to them. Iginla is not gonna sign here for some steep discount, he has a few more years the rake in the millions and will be taking advantage of that.
dino7c is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 12:54 PM   #168
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I only read the first 3 pages of this thread, but if this rumour is true, i am surprised that some of you are happy that Vancouver or NY Rangers are not on the list. For me i want as many teams on that list as possible. That does not mean they have to trade him to Vancouver but it could help with leverage against other teams. I wish the list was 10 -15 teams deep.
Well I think Iginla probably realizes that it would be painful for fans to see him go to one of the Flames biggest rivals. So that crosses Vancouver off.

Then you have the Rangers who are currently out of the playoffs in the standings. Not sure why anyone would think Iginla would fancy his chances of winning a cup there.

Neither of those destinations really make any sense. It seems clear he's cherry picked what he and his agent think are the top teams with the best chances of winning the cup that aren't one of the Flames biggest rivals. Not sure why people would expect his list to be substantially bigger.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 03-24-2013 at 01:01 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:00 PM   #169
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

It is a godamn shame that this organization is in a situation where trading Iginla is something that even has to be considered.

Crazy to think that if two things could have happened, he would likely be a Flame for his entire career without question.

1. Somebody would have seen that friggin puck cross the line in 2004
2. Somebody in this organization could have drafted and developed some friggin talent in the last 10+ years

Either of those happens and the Flames aren't a position where trading Iggy is likely the best scenario to:

1. Give Iggy a chance at a Cup with a contender (because with drafting and development this team is still likely in the hunt)
2. Attempt to reload the organizational prospect/young player base.

Pisses me off that we're in this situation.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:02 PM   #170
Reign of Fire
First Line Centre
 
Reign of Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Reppin' the C in BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakbutter View Post
I hope it's more than just Iginla being traded. It wouldn't make sense to ship our franchise player out of town and leave other good trade options (stempniak, cammy, kipper, bouw) stajan ect) on the rooster. Might as well go all in and sell off everyone that won't be a contributor in 3-4 years.
If Iggy is going, then you move everybody. No point keepng anyone else around.
Reign of Fire is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:05 PM   #171
Sakari
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Sakari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

You get the 3 best teams in the league in a bidding war against eachother, you get a huge return.
Sakari is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:08 PM   #172
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign of Fire View Post
If Iggy is going, then you move everybody. No point keepng anyone else around.
I would want a somewhat balanced team, trade Jbo or Gio, Iginla, Cammy or Tanguay, Stempniak. Gutting the entire thing would leave us no balance and a place to hide the young kids
Bonded is online now  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:08 PM   #173
Ryan Coke
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyBeers View Post
Once Iginla gives his list, his influence on the transaction should be zero with the exception of catching the flight out of town.
Assuming true, he gave a list where he would consider. He still has a full NMC, so it is ENTIRELY his discretion, right until he signs off.
Ryan Coke is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:16 PM   #174
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan Coke View Post
Assuming true, he gave a list where he would consider. He still has a full NMC, so it is ENTIRELY his discretion, right until he signs off.
Don't believe that is how it works in this case. If he's given a list of teams he's willing to waive his NMC for then that is the end of his involvement in the decision making process.

They wouldn't ask him for a list of teams he'd "consider" waiving to go to, they'd ask him for a list of teams he will waive to go to.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 01:16 PM   #175
Otto29
Scoring Winger
 
Otto29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign of Fire View Post
If Iggy is going, then you move everybody. No point keepng anyone else around.
I don't agree with that. The Flames aren't going to blow it up if they trade Iggy. They will add a few players but they wouldn't trade everyone
Otto29 is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:18 PM   #176
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Also, the best three teams in the league have been drafting late in the first round lately and im a bit concerned about the quality of their prospects, as a general rule, as compared to a team who is on the bubble and has drafted mid round or higher.

And with Gillies, Broissart and Ramo, i have little interest in Subban. BUT by asking For (in his capacity of Boston's top prospect not yet in the NHL), it sends word to the other contenders that you had better put up some top quality prospects.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:19 PM   #177
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RT14 View Post
I don't. If we're not getting anything back that has even a remote chance of becoming a top player down the road, what is the point? A trade of our franchise player is supposed to kick start a rebuild here. A few mediocre pieces does not kick start anything.

IMO, at least one of the 2 or 3 pieces we get back will have top potential. Late 1st, blue chip prospect, top 6 forward. Otherwise there's no point.
The time for trading Iginla for a prospect who could replace him was 2-3 seasons ago.

People need to let go of the 'franchise player' label. The teams trading for Iginla don't care what he meant to the Flames in the past. They only care about what he is likely to do for them in the next couple months, or possibly the next couple years.

Mike Modano was the franchise player of the Stars organization for almost 20 years. He ended his career pencilled in as centering the Wing's 3rd line. That's how most star players - even first ballot hall of famers - end their careers.

If you can get one or more pieces back that will do more for the Flames in the next 2-6 seasons than Jarome Iginla will in that time frame, then you do it. I'd be happy with depth in a rebuild. Teams so rarely move out top-flight prospects these days unless it's for players just entering their prime (Richards, Carter).
CliffFletcher is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 01:29 PM   #178
return to the red
Franchise Player
 
return to the red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
Exp:
Default

Not a fan of players submitting apparent lists, it severely limits the ability of the team to receive substantial offers.

Obviously if they have NTC's or NMC's it's the players right to do that but I'd rather they get the offers in, take it to the players and then go from there. Maybe huge waste of times but you just never know.

That being said I could get behind Iginla on LA, Boston or Pitt but not Chicago
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
return to the red is offline  
Old 03-24-2013, 01:30 PM   #179
goflamesgo18
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Kevin Kurz ‏@KKurzCSN 12m
One note to pass along during my travel day: hearing Boston no longer has interest in #SJSharks Ryane Clowe.
goflamesgo18 is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to goflamesgo18 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2013, 01:30 PM   #180
HELPNEEDED
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cool Ville
Exp:
Default

Oh I fear him landing in LA, he would eat the flames for lunch.
HELPNEEDED is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy