01-16-2024, 10:52 PM
|
#17081
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
With the team competing, I don’ think Conroy is in a hurry to deal for futures
We may see some hockey deals like Toffoli’s where they get someone back that are struggling but can still help
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 10:54 PM
|
#17082
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Just for the fun of it… what do you think the leafs would have to offer right now in order for Conroy to approach Markstrom to waive his NMC? They are likely getting very desperate. Their prospect pool is nothing impressive so it would likely have to be picks. The leafs would need to send back Samsonov and the flames would also have to retain some salary. It’s likely a huge price…. One not seen from a goalie trade in a long time. I’ll say at least 2 first round picks (top 3 protection). Extra high price because Conroy is likely not at all eager to trade Markstrom, Treliving should be getting desperate, and the owner likely does not want to do Treliving any favours.
Last edited by stemit14; 01-16-2024 at 10:56 PM.
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 10:59 PM
|
#17083
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
Just for the fun of it… what do you think the leafs would have to offer right now in order for Conroy to approach Markstrom to waive his NMC? They are likely getting very desperate. Their prospect pool is nothing impressive so it would likely have to be picks. The leafs would need to send back Samsonov and the flames would also have to retain some salary. It’s likely a huge price…. One not seen from a goalie trade in a long time. I’ll say at least 2 first round picks (top 3 protection). Extra high price because Conroy is likely not at all eager to trade Markstrom, Treliving should be getting desperate, and the owner likely does not want to do Treliving any favours.
|
TOR doesn't have the assets.
1) taking Samsonov - it's only one yr @ $3.5M, so maybe a 2nd (they don't have any)
2) Markstrom - a 1st and a prospect
3) retain $2M on Markstrom for 3 years. Probably a 1st, or 2 2nds
Toronto simply doesn't have the assets to do it
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:09 PM
|
#17084
|
Franchise Player
|
I really liked M. McLeod's game in NJ. He has a good two way game. He's both defensively responsible, and looks like a pretty good puck carrier(which we need). When Hughes gets back he'll be stuck as the #3C, behind him and Hischier.
If we end up trading any of our UFAs to NJ, he'd be one of the less flashy names I'd target. What do you guys think of him?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:11 PM
|
#17085
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
Just for the fun of it… what do you think the leafs would have to offer right now in order for Conroy to approach Markstrom to waive his NMC? They are likely getting very desperate. Their prospect pool is nothing impressive so it would likely have to be picks. The leafs would need to send back Samsonov and the flames would also have to retain some salary. It’s likely a huge price…. One not seen from a goalie trade in a long time. I’ll say at least 2 first round picks (top 3 protection). Extra high price because Conroy is likely not at all eager to trade Markstrom, Treliving should be getting desperate, and the owner likely does not want to do Treliving any favours.
|
Nylander and Samsonov for Markstrom, Tanev, Vladar and Lindholm.
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:12 PM
|
#17086
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
TOR doesn't have the assets.
1) taking Samsonov - it's only one yr @ $3.5M, so maybe a 2nd (they don't have any)
2) Markstrom - a 1st and a prospect
3) retain $2M on Markstrom for 3 years. Probably a 1st, or 2 2nds
Toronto simply doesn't have the assets to do it
|
They do have them. Even if the 2nd round pick is not this year. So you’re guess would be:
To Toronto:
Markstrom ($2 million retained)
To Calgary:
2024 1st round pick
2025 1st round pick
2025 2nd round pick
2026 2nd round pick
B-level prospect
It’s a very high price to pay… one that - if it doesn’t work out - the GM gets fired for. So in reality, the leafs would not ever pay this price… but I like your reasoning for the cost… seems reasonable for a desperate team trading for a key player that the flames don’t really want to trade right now.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:15 PM
|
#17087
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
They do have them. Even if the 2nd round pick is not this year. So you’re guess would be:
To Toronto:
Markstrom ($2 million retained)
To Calgary:
2024 1st round pick
2025 1st round pick
2025 2nd round pick
2026 2nd round pick
B-level prospect
It’s a very high price to pay… one that - if it doesn’t work out - the GM gets fired for. So in reality, the leafs would not ever pay this price… but I like your reasoning for the cost… seems reasonable for a desperate team trading for a key player that the flames don’t really want to trade right now.
|
Or, if you have a higher level prospect, you can replace them for whatever group of picks would be their equivalent.
Yes, high price to pay, and any GM doing that is putting their job on the line.
Edit: I think you have one too many 2nds in there
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:18 PM
|
#17088
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Or, if you have a higher level prospect, you can replace them for whatever group of picks would be their equivalent.
Yes, high price to pay, and any GM doing that is putting their job on the line.
Edit: I think you have one too many 2nds in there
|
Treliving is a deal maker. I don’t think he is the kind that worries about losing a job
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:18 PM
|
#17089
|
Franchise Player
|
So it should be: 2024 1st, 2025 1st, 2026 2nd, prospect
(remember, the Flames are taking Samsonov (cap dump), AND they are retaining on Markstrom for 3 years)
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:19 PM
|
#17090
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames and Leafs have the same record give or take...maybe they should be sending the players lol
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:33 PM
|
#17091
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Wonder if Trees gonna get a video tribute when the Leafs play in CGY.
I also wonder if the rumor is true that the owner won't deal treliving and the Leafs on trades.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:34 PM
|
#17092
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I'm sure there will be lots of conditions.
2024 1st, 2025 2nd(conditions) top Forward prospect and cap dump.
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:34 PM
|
#17093
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Wonder if Trees gonna get a video tribute when the Leafs play in CGY.
I also wonder if the rumor is true that the owner won't deal treliving and the Leafs on trades.
|
Leafs don't really have much to offer is the issue I think
that and they have the same record as the Flames
__________________
GFG
Last edited by dino7c; 01-16-2024 at 11:42 PM.
|
|
|
01-16-2024, 11:38 PM
|
#17094
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Wonder if Trees gonna get a video tribute when the Leafs play in CGY.
I also wonder if the rumor is true that the owner won't deal treliving and the Leafs on trades.
|
They should, have Neal, Brouwer, Raymond, and Hamonic thank him on the big screen, in front of the sea of red. Then switch to guys that didn't want to be here like Fox, Hamilton, Gaudreau, Tkachuk, and Bennett.
|
|
|
01-17-2024, 12:35 AM
|
#17095
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Wonder if Trees gonna get a video tribute when the Leafs play in CGY.
I also wonder if the rumor is true that the owner won't deal treliving and the Leafs on trades.
|
Not true.
They wanted Z and Retention but didn’t want to play the price.
__________________

|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-17-2024, 12:51 AM
|
#17096
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
They do have them. Even if the 2nd round pick is not this year. So you’re guess would be:
To Toronto:
Markstrom ($2 million retained)
To Calgary:
2024 1st round pick
2025 1st round pick
2025 2nd round pick
2026 2nd round pick
B-level prospect
It’s a very high price to pay… one that - if it doesn’t work out - the GM gets fired for. So in reality, the leafs would not ever pay this price… but I like your reasoning for the cost… seems reasonable for a desperate team trading for a key player that the flames don’t really want to trade right now.
|
Toronto doesn't own any of their own picks highlighted in red.
|
|
|
01-17-2024, 02:01 AM
|
#17097
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
I really liked M. McLeod's game in NJ. He has a good two way game. He's both defensively responsible, and looks like a pretty good puck carrier(which we need). When Hughes gets back he'll be stuck as the #3C, behind him and Hischier.
If we end up trading any of our UFAs to NJ, he'd be one of the less flashy names I'd target. What do you guys think of him?
|
We debated McLeod a few times in this thread, and he definitely has his boosters as well as detractors. I think it depends on who we're trading, but McLeod wouldn't work as the "young roster player", or "prospect" in any deal, but he would be great as the "salary" player, in the event that NJ needed to move out money. McLeod is 25, so he's still young, but no spring chicken as he turns 26 in February. He's in the midst of a good season though, with 19 points in 41 games, and he's big and quite fast with some power and toughness. I like him, and wouldn't mind having him here at all- maybe he would squeeze out Dube...
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-17-2024, 02:21 AM
|
#17098
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
So it should be: 2024 1st, 2025 1st, 2026 2nd, prospect
(remember, the Flames are taking Samsonov (cap dump), AND they are retaining on Markstrom for 3 years)
|
Those are all going to be late round picks, better change that prospect to Knies for Conroy to even consider it imo.
|
|
|
01-17-2024, 02:56 AM
|
#17099
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
Those are all going to be late round picks, better change that prospect to Knies for Conroy to even consider it imo.
|
Have you seen the standings?
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
01-17-2024, 03:13 AM
|
#17100
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Have you seen the standings?
|
I know the standings, the Leafs sit 3rd in the Atlantic, they have a very good roster with no goaltending. What do you think happens if they have Markstrom in goal? They will start banking points like crazy.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM.
|
|