03-31-2015, 08:44 AM
|
#1681
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Oh, and critical game for the Jets tonight. If they lose in regulation, their odds drop below 50%.
Edit: and just for fun, the Fenwick prediction model finally has is in a dead heat with LA, and rapidly hauling in Winnipeg:
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-31-2015, 08:52 AM
|
#1682
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Beat Arizona, beat Edmonton (far easier said than done), and win one or the other (in regulation) between Winnipeg/LA. Again, easier said than done.
Knowing the Blues, they will dominate us again after choking like mad against all of our opposition.
|
^this
Oil have won 3 straight, 4 out of last 5. Lighting it up. Typical for them, this time of year.
And anyone who doesn't see this game as the highlight of their season (potentially dealing the Flames playoff chances a crippling blow), then you aren't paying attention.
That 2 points will be every bit as tough as the 2 against the Blues, Jets or Kings.
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:01 AM
|
#1683
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
^this
Oil have won 3 straight, 4 out of last 5. Lighting it up. Typical for them, this time of year.
And anyone who doesn't see this game as the highlight of their season (potentially dealing the Flames playoff chances a crippling blow), then you aren't paying attention.
That 2 points will be every bit as tough as the 2 against the Blues, Jets or Kings.
|
I'll still take my chances against Oil, although I agree it won't be like playing the Sabers.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:13 AM
|
#1684
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
^this
Oil have won 3 straight, 4 out of last 5. Lighting it up. Typical for them, this time of year.
And anyone who doesn't see this game as the highlight of their season (potentially dealing the Flames playoff chances a crippling blow), then you aren't paying attention.
That 2 points will be every bit as tough as the 2 against the Blues, Jets or Kings.
|
Hopefully, if the Oilers insist on finishing with a flourish, they can take a couple points from the Kings in their 2 games.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:22 AM
|
#1685
|
|
In Your MCP
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
|
Pretty sure we're going to lose one of the Phoenix or Edmonton games. Probably Edmonton.
Fortunately, so will LA. They get Edmonton twice, and right now I can see them dropping one of those games (likely tonight). The oil, canucks, or san jose is going to get a chance to put a fork in them.
(go oil go canucks i feel dirty)
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:25 AM
|
#1686
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
|
Huge game tonight. Winnipeg wont play again until we host the Vancouver Dive squad on Saturday.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:26 AM
|
#1687
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Oh, and critical game for the Jets tonight. If they lose in regulation, their odds drop below 50%.
Edit: and just for fun, the Fenwick prediction model finally has is in a dead heat with LA, and rapidly hauling in Winnipeg:

|
Thats gotta be one of the worst graphs I've seen. Never mind the fact 9 teams are likely to make the playoff, that color legend is impossible to follow. How many shades of dark blue and green did they really need to use?
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:34 AM
|
#1688
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
97 points?
Minny 1-5
Canucks 2-4
Winnipeg 3-2-1
Calgary 3-2
Kings 4-1-1
It's looks to be working itself out.
Realistically Jets, Flames and Kings for the last two spots
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:38 AM
|
#1689
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Thats gotta be one of the worst graphs I've seen. Never mind the fact 9 teams are likely to make the playoff, that color legend is impossible to follow. How many shades of dark blue and green did they really need to use?
|
Funny how it is rapidly correcting for the fact that Fenwick doesn't predict the results for the Flames.
The Flames Fenwick has been bad for 77 games but here they are ahead of Winnipeg and LA in the standings. Are we really supposed to believe that the last 5 games will be predicted by Fenwick, when it hasn't worked for the first 77?
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:41 AM
|
#1690
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Thats gotta be one of the worst graphs I've seen. Never mind the fact 9 teams are likely to make the playoff, that color legend is impossible to follow. How many shades of dark blue and green did they really need to use?
|
The nine teams 'likely' to make it is proper, actually. View it as three teams for two spots, and all are pretty much on the same point pace. Two spots would equal 200 'percent', which would give each a 2/3rds chance of making it.
Sportsclubstats also has nine teams likely to make it, though LA is much lower. Calgary 84.1, Winnipeg 63.7, LA 51.7.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:47 AM
|
#1691
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewmaster
Funny how it is rapidly correcting for the fact that Fenwick doesn't predict the results for the Flames.
The Flames Fenwick has been bad for 77 games but here they are ahead of Winnipeg and LA in the standings. Are we really supposed to believe that the last 5 games will be predicted by Fenwick, when it hasn't worked for the first 77?
|
It's not "correcting" anything. There's less games for LA to make the difference up.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:51 AM
|
#1692
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewmaster
Funny how it is rapidly correcting for the fact that Fenwick doesn't predict the results for the Flames.
The Flames Fenwick has been bad for 77 games but here they are ahead of Winnipeg and LA in the standings. Are we really supposed to believe that the last 5 games will be predicted by Fenwick, when it hasn't worked for the first 77?
|
Our Fenwick must have been pretty spectacular last night for our odds to improve by 40%.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:57 AM
|
#1693
|
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
Huge game tonight. Winnipeg wont play again until we host the Vancouver Dive squad on Saturday.
|
We know what is going on with Winnipeg. And we want them to lose.
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:58 AM
|
#1694
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Not THE CHART~ again.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 09:58 AM
|
#1695
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
It's not "correcting" anything. There's less games for LA to make the difference up.
|
The Flames have held a playoff spot for the majority of the season, but this graph has given them a 50% or greater probability for less than 1 week total. If I look at the probability on sportsclubstats, which does not take Fenwick into consideration, the Flames have been 50% or greater for almost the entire season, reflecting their position in the standings. The fact is, this graph is now rapidly correcting for the fact that Fenwick did not accurately predict the Flames position in the standings.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 10:07 AM
|
#1696
|
|
NOT a cool kid
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Would love to see the boys beat Blues/Edm/Arizona and have WIN/LA lose. Make those last couple games less stressful.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 10:08 AM
|
#1697
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewmaster
The Flames have held a playoff spot for the majority of the season, but this graph has given them a 50% or greater probability for less than 1 week total. If I look at the probability on sportsclubstats, which does not take Fenwick into consideration, the Flames have been 50% or greater for almost the entire season, reflecting their position in the standings. The fact is, this graph is now rapidly correcting for the fact that Fenwick did not accurately predict the Flames position in the standings.
|
No, it's not correcting anything. For quite a while, the higher Fenwick team had more games to make a difference and were not 3 points back. Now there's only 6 games left for them and they have to catch up. The graph doesn't have a mind to change
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 10:40 AM
|
#1698
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Edit: and just for fun, the Fenwick prediction model finally has is in a dead heat with LA, and rapidly hauling in Winnipeg:
|
I know you said just for fun, but the reason I've stopped posting it is because with so few games left a win or loss by the Kings, Flames or Jets can cause a massive swing one way or another.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 10:49 AM
|
#1699
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: H E double hockey sticks
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
Huge game tonight. Winnipeg wont play again until we host the Vancouver Dive squad on Saturday.
|
If the Jets lose then that will be a long painful 3 days to wait. And man I do not envy the Jets next week of games... Rangers-Canucks-Wild-Blues.
|
|
|
03-31-2015, 10:50 AM
|
#1700
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Can't wait until there is an X beside the Flames in the standings.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 AM.
|
|