One way to think about Time is it’s the flow of entropy. Entropy of a system can only increase. Now originally this was based on probabilistic arguments and observations that were never violated. But more recently there is some mathematical work being done to show it’s compatible with quantum physics.
For as long as it holds up the second law of thermodynamics makes time have a direction and in effect real.
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
One day you're believing in joyriding alien visitors, the next day it's "vaccines are broadcasting 5g signals to reprogram our kids' genders!" Irrational credulity has consequences. I likely still wouldn't care enough to comment, but the egregious bloviating by a certain someone convinced of his own certitude irks me mightily.
Theoretically, this is a conversation between adults, so the idea that we should let the kids play dumb games if they want to doesn't really scan. Start a "let's all get high and treat ridiculous ideas as real for the lolz!" thread if that's what you're looking for, as soon as the believers started making grandiose claims it moved out of that realm and into a debate.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jammies For This Useful Post:
I’m just gonna go on limb in this thread and say ALIENS ARE WALKING AMONGST US, THE EVIDENCE IS BEING HIDDEN BY THE GLOBAL CABAL. Just want to see the regular insufferable crew come back and say something. Eagerly anticipating any response, no matter what it is. Let’s goooooo!
Who here is making ‘absolute conclusions without evidence’?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
I’m just gonna go on limb in this thread and say ALIENS ARE WALKING AMONGST US, THE EVIDENCE IS BEING HIDDEN BY THE GLOBAL CABAL. Just want to see the regular insufferable crew come back and say something. Eagerly anticipating any response, no matter what it is. Let’s goooooo!
I’m worried for you too, but I wouldn’t mock a serious health service that people need for legit reasons. Pepsi, chill, it’s a message board. I have, you need to as well.
Back on topic, the UFO subject is best approached with an open mind. No one has the answers, but that’s what things seem to be building to. The last six years have been incredibly interesting. I implore all to do a deep dive on Gary Nolan, Abi Loeb, David Grusch, David Fravor, AARO, the NASA task force and time date it to 2017. Great stuff that really is great content for further discussion in this thread.
I’m worried for you too, but I wouldn’t mock a serious health service that people need for legit reasons. Pepsi, chill, it’s a message board. I have, you need to as well.
Back on topic, the UFO subject is best approached with an open mind. No one has the answers, but that’s what things seem to be building to. The last six years have been incredibly interesting. I implore all to do a deep dive on Gary Nolan, Abi Loeb, David Grusch, David Fravor, AARO, the NASA task force and time date it to 2017. Great stuff that really is great content for further discussion in this thread.
Nobody is mocking a serious health service, it’s there for you if you need it, that’s all. Glad to hear you’re feeling a little more chill.
We’ve been discussing this stuff with an open mind for three years and I’m sure everyone will happily continue to do so, so it’s great you’ve been catching up on the topic and are participating more. I’m sure there will be lots more to discuss over the next couple of years.
In Nolan’s defence he did debunk one of the alien fetuses so he does appear to be willing to do good research when he has access to materials.. He had a peer reviewed published paper and that sounded exciting.
I even found a free version of it. It’s an interesting paper discussing the spectroscopy of the council bluffs material and how and what should be looked at when analyzing unknown materials. It finds the council bluffs materials capable of being earth made and no inconsistencies in isotopes.
What do you find compelling about Nolan? He seems like someone who is overly passionate about his hobby drawing conclusions based on speculation but when does research that is published doesn’t find interesting things. I didn’t dive into his brain research stuff as for me materials not able to be fabricated by methods on earth that are publicly available for testing would be the easiet way to visitation.
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
