Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2018, 04:20 PM   #1581
Mike F
Franchise Player
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Djibouti
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
We sold a core guy, a add on guy with one year left and a prospect that was never going to sign here for two core guys at 23 and under.

I'm good.
Why are you automatically deeming Lindholm to be a core asset for the Flames? From Canes fans perspective, it doesn't seem like any of them saw him as a core asset being shipped out, and they've watched him play for years.

IMO, he's a guy that could be a core asset is he finally reaches the potential he had in his draft year, but he's not there yet.
Mike F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 04:28 PM   #1582
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I consider backlund and Frolik really good third liners.

Ferland played like a top six under very certain conditions. But honestly it felt more and more last year like mony, Johnny and Tkachuk were our top six guys. I think lindholm is on the cusp of being a bonafide top six forward, so that brings us to 4. We really need another add here, then hope that a kid takes another step forward or backlund has an offensive resurgence.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 04:33 PM   #1583
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F View Post
Why are you automatically deeming Lindholm to be a core asset for the Flames? From Canes fans perspective, it doesn't seem like any of them saw him as a core asset being shipped out, and they've watched him play for years.

IMO, he's a guy that could be a core asset is he finally reaches the potential he had in his draft year, but he's not there yet.
Lindholm doesn't need to be a core asset. He needs to be Chris Kunitz. He needs to be someone who can play with the two best players on the team and not hold them back.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 04:33 PM   #1584
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Not sure that I agree but USA Today declares the Flames the big winner on draft day because of this trade.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...raft/36332423/
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SportsJunky For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2018, 04:57 PM   #1585
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
The more I read up about the situation and both players we got, the more I warm up to it.

I expect by season's start I'll be convinced they're the second coming of Peter Forsberg and Ryan Suter.
Come on. it's the Flames. Hakan Loob and Gary Suter they are!
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Johnny Makarov For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2018, 05:00 PM   #1586
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny makarov View Post
come on. It's the flames. Hakan loob and gary suter they are!

damn straight!!!
midniteowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 05:11 PM   #1587
Beninho
Franchise Player
 
Beninho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F View Post
Why are you automatically deeming Lindholm to be a core asset for the Flames? From Canes fans perspective, it doesn't seem like any of them saw him as a core asset being shipped out, and they've watched him play for years.

IMO, he's a guy that could be a core asset is he finally reaches the potential he had in his draft year, but he's not there yet.
You keep referencing what Canes fans think but I believe most of the opinions you are getting are opinions after the trade was done. I think the general consensus about Lindholm is that he’s gradually improving and has more room to grow while playing a energetic 2 way game.
Beninho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 05:29 PM   #1588
H2SO4(aq)
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

I’m oretty happy with the trade. Hanafin looks like a solid young top 4 guy. Lindholm seems like a versatile top 9 guy who I honestly wanted more than mony at the draft. And I think most importantly, if by moving Hamilton and returning Brodie to gios right side can make Brodie the player from 2015, then this trade is a huge win. Getting 2015 Brodie and hanafin for Hamilton would be a steal. Hoping it works out like that.

As for the former flames, I hated how ferland ended last season. He looked checked out. Hamilton, I’ll ignore the rumours of character issues, but he is a soft player. His dumb penalties were frustrating too. I’m not sad at all to see him go. Fox wasn’t going to sign, don’t care.
H2SO4(aq) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 05:30 PM   #1589
JurassicTunga12
Franchise Player
 
JurassicTunga12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Any interviews with Lindholm yet?
JurassicTunga12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 05:39 PM   #1590
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicTunga12 View Post
Any interviews with Lindholm yet?
No. What an uppity swede.

Joking aside, it's sunday. and post draft. Im sure the radio guys have to fly home and get ready for tomorrow.

So Im assuming we will hear from him tomorrow. Lindholm also was in Russia for the Sweden game yesterday. Suffice to say he was not going to find a quiet place.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2018, 05:55 PM   #1591
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Dougie Hamilton is the ultimate stats vs scouts guy.

Stats guys think he's elite and dominate. I'd argue a ton of that is due to playing with Giordano and the 3M line who are really good. But we shall see now that they are apart.

Scouts/GMs etc constantly show they feel differently. Hamilton was left off the Team North America at the World Cup behind guys like Ryan Murray or Jacob Trouba. He's been traded twice for non-elite player returns.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 06:05 PM   #1592
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Hamilton was left off team NA because Chiarelli was still salty about not getting him from Boston. He was miles better than anyone on that team.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to bigrangy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2018, 06:19 PM   #1593
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Dougie Hamilton is the ultimate stats vs scouts guy.

Stats guys think he's elite and dominate. I'd argue a ton of that is due to playing with Giordano and the 3M line who are really good. But we shall see now that they are apart.

Scouts/GMs etc constantly show they feel differently. Hamilton was left off the Team North America at the World Cup behind guys like Ryan Murray or Jacob Trouba. He's been traded twice for non-elite player returns.
Not explicitly you, but as a group can we lay off the hyperbole on the two incoming guys. Hanafin was a 21 year old all-star last year. Yes there are holes in his game, but for his age and skill level, this is a high end player.

As a mental exercise, I challenge those that are struggling with the quality of Hanafin and Lindholm to find another time in teams history where we could have made a trade like this getting two <23 year olds of their quality without giving up our top two forwards or our captain. I don't think we have had a return like this since likely the Nieuwendyk deal.
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 06:20 PM   #1594
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoFleury View Post
After a day to think about it, I think DH just didn't have the type of bananas trade value that was being proclaimed by many on this site. It was a fair trade, both gave to get. DH obviously had to go and this was the best trade out there. Not much you can do about that. At least BT didn't 'Phaneuf' this trade all to hell. That's a positive.
I think Hamilton did have massive trade value. But in my narrative Noah Hanifin also has massive trade value and so does Elias Lindholm. I think some are underrating the value of the young players we got from CAR because they haven't fully developed yet. I think Hanifin's value is not far off Seth Jones' value when he was dealt for Ryan Johansen.

The original proposal we talked about where Hamilton was traded for Hanifin + Lindholm would have been an absolute fleecing of CAR IMO. Basically we'd be getting Lindholm almost for free because I view Hanifin's value and Hamilton's value as very close.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 06-24-2018 at 06:23 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2018, 06:24 PM   #1595
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F View Post
That's the problem in a nutshell! You have to believe that this was the big trade this offseason (Peters has said that they see Gio playing with Brodie and Hanifin with Hamonic, so there's no more valuable defensemen to ship out) yet it's debatable whether the team is any better* and, by your own admission, it definitely still hasn't addressed the scoring issue!

When I questioned whether he's done, what I meant was I'm not sure if he'll be able to get more scoring. Certainly I think he knows it's needed and will try.


Do you feel this trade served no purpose then? Just a trade for the sake of making a trade? It's been mentioned by others in various threads, but you don't have to fix all the problems with a single trade. Nor should you be expected to.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 06:26 PM   #1596
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F View Post
Why are you automatically deeming Lindholm to be a core asset for the Flames? From Canes fans perspective, it doesn't seem like any of them saw him as a core asset being shipped out, and they've watched him play for years.

IMO, he's a guy that could be a core asset is he finally reaches the potential he had in his draft year, but he's not there yet.
Well I don't see Canes fans as some of authority. Imagine fans of another team looked at our Bennett discussions. They'd think he was a worthless piece of crap based on what half this site says about him.

Fans in general have a problem with running out of patience for young players to develop. We saw it with Backlund. We saw it with Jankowski. We see it with Bennett. Same is likely the case for Canes fans and Lindholm.

Scouts and GMs don't have that same issue. They realize some young kids take until 24-26 to hit their peak. They watch the players and see more upside, more development to go.

Lindholm is very likely to be a core player for us because he's very likely to continue to improve in the next two years. Same goes for Hanifin.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2018, 06:34 PM   #1597
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Well I don't see Canes fans as some of authority. Imagine fans of another team looked at our Bennett discussions. They'd think he was a worthless piece of crap based on what half this site says about him.

Fans in general have a problem with running out of patience for young players to develop. We saw it with Backlund. We saw it with Jankowski. We see it with Bennett. Same is likely the case for Canes fans and Lindholm.

Scouts and GMs don't have that same issue. They realize some young kids take until 24-26 to hit their peak. They watch the players and see more upside, more development to go.

Lindholm is very likely to be a core player for us because he's very likely to continue to improve in the next two years. Same goes for Hanifin.
Further to what you said. Sometimes these young guys are asked not to worry too much about offense but to work developing a good 200 foot game. Just because a player is not scoring does not mean he is not doing the job he was asked to do. Peters knows Lindholm and now probably feels he is ready to take that step with some offensive players. At least they are going to take a look and see and we do have some more options.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 06:40 PM   #1598
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
I think Hamilton did have massive trade value. But in my narrative Noah Hanifin also has massive trade value and so does Elias Lindholm. I think some are underrating the value of the young players we got from CAR because they haven't fully developed yet. I think Hanifin's value is not far off Seth Jones' value when he was dealt for Ryan Johansen.

The original proposal we talked about where Hamilton was traded for Hanifin + Lindholm would have been an absolute fleecing of CAR IMO. Basically we'd be getting Lindholm almost for free because I view Hanifin's value and Hamilton's value as very close.
Yep. Hamilton for Hanifin or Lindholm on their own is a bad deal for us. Hamilton for both is a great deal for us.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 06:44 PM   #1599
H2SO4(aq)
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Sometimes patience pays off. Look at devante smith pelly and Brett Connolly.
H2SO4(aq) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 07:31 PM   #1600
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

I like the trade, though the Flames gave up a little more than warranted for the risk taken on. Risky because the chances of the players reaching their upside aren't extremely high, and secondly signing to a reasonable contract is still TBD. You know what you're getting with Hamilton, and while he may not be a franchise dman (I don't think he is), he was pretty solid. No problem with them dealing Fox as they appeared to be on the outside looking in when it came to signing him. So Carolina if they're able to sign him ends up with a very good prospect. So this now comes down to Ferland, and though the guy has a pretty unique skillset being a powerforward, I think his mediocre speed has been upgraded on, but I wish they made a separate deal to either bring in a player one for one or deal him for a draft pick. I was once high on the guy, but speed is a bigger part of the NHL game now so not having him on the team is a plus, but I'm sure there are teams out there who would take a different approach to the game and would welcome him.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy