Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-09-2016, 09:11 AM   #1581
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Deaths by pitbull isn't a good statistic to pull. Its bites and damage that are more concerning.

The problem with pitbulls is that the damage they can do when they do go off. The rat sized dogs create puncture wounds the pitbulls tear off half a face.

So its the automatic weapon vs rifle situation.

I think owners should have the potential to be criminally responsible for the actions of their dogs.

Having a large, poorly secured, untrained dog is negligent.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:13 AM   #1582
habernac
Franchise Player
 
habernac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
Deaths by pitbull isn't a good statistic to pull. Its bites and damage that are more concerning.

The problem with pitbulls is that the damage they can do when they do go off. The rat sized dogs create puncture wounds the pitbulls tear off half a face.

So its the automatic weapon vs rifle situation.

I think owners should have the potential to be criminally responsible for the actions of their dogs.

Having a large, poorly secured, untrained dog is negligent.
This. Prosecute the ####ty owners to the full extent of the law.
habernac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:17 AM   #1583
Thor
God of Hating Twitter
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Small dog breeds are often the most aggressive, usually because the stupid owners treat them like they are harmless little plush toys. I've been bitten 2 times in my life, both times by little ####### dogs.

Maybe people should have to get a license to get a dog, which includes courses on raising them and how to be a good pet owner. Certainly if you have a bigger breed, but all people even ones with little dogs should be forced to learn how to raise a dog.

I can't tell you how many women I know have little tiny dogs who they think are the cutest things in the world, have done no proper raising of them and they run around like they own the place (dominant) and are aggressive as all hell.

I don't really have a dog in this fight, my exposure to pitbull breeds has been mostly in my childhood with our neighbors who had 2 amazing dogs, and one here in Iceland a friend of mine has.

I'm a golden retriever man myself, love the breed, but even that breed has violent attacks.
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:18 AM   #1584
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Small dog breeds are often the most aggressive, usually because the stupid owners treat them like they are harmless little plush toys. I've been bitten 2 times in my life, both times by little ####### dogs.
But I'm assuming those dogs didn't kill you in their encounters, would that be correct?
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:19 AM   #1585
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Then you support banning German Sheppards, Rotweilers, Labradors as well?

Death by a real dog- 1 in 116,448.
Death by a hot dog- 1 in 3,375.

Deaths are horrific, all animal attacks are, but are we not overreacting here just a tad?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steffe...b_8112394.html
We're not over reacting because there is no down side to banning pit bulls.
It's a fairly pointless breed in every respect, they aren't a good guard dog nor are they bright, they were bred by Victorians and before as a dog to put into an arena with other dogs or large animals to bet on, their one historic trait is aggression and fighting ability.

If they disappear there is no downside, we don't need a fighting dog anymore.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-09-2016, 09:29 AM   #1586
Thor
God of Hating Twitter
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
But I'm assuming those dogs didn't kill you in their encounters, would that be correct?
Just made me dead inside.
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:34 AM   #1587
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

If you argue for gun control, then a pitbull ban should be simple.

"I like guns" "I like Pitbulls"

Except, even as someone who is for gun control, guns are way easier to defend to keep than Pitbulls.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:36 AM   #1588
Thor
God of Hating Twitter
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

So because one out of 115,000 approx die from dog attacks every year (of 78 million dogs owned in the US,) we should take action? Is there not a serious overreaction here?
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!

Last edited by Thor; 06-09-2016 at 09:39 AM.
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:40 AM   #1589
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

What's the overreaction?

Stop selling and breeding a useless breed that, regardless of whether it's the owner's fault or not, has proven pretty dangerous.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 06-09-2016, 09:41 AM   #1590
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
So because one out of 115,000 approx die from dog attacks every year, we should take action? Is there not a serious overreaction here?
It's not just deaths, it's a combination of the attacks and the literal no downside to banning the breed. We have plenty of other dogs to choose from, if every pitbull cross disappeared tommorow it would have no effect on anyone's life anywhere in the world.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-09-2016, 09:44 AM   #1591
WCan_Kid
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon View Post
It's not just deaths, it's a combination of the attacks and the literal no downside to banning the breed. We have plenty of other dogs to choose from, if every pitbull cross disappeared tommorow it would have no effect on anyone's life anywhere in the world.
Exactly, because a pitbull ban would just mean that the terrible owners would move on to something else. Lots of dogs are just as dangerous, if not more so, than pits, so banning that particular breed wouldn't change a thing.
WCan_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:45 AM   #1592
Thor
God of Hating Twitter
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

So have Rottweilers and German Shepards. I'm assuming those 2 should be included?

Would you allow current owners to keep their dogs, and ban all future sales of these top say 5 large dog breeds which are the bulk of attacks resulting in deaths?
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:45 AM   #1593
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon View Post
It's not just deaths, it's a combination of the attacks and the literal no downside to banning the breed. We have plenty of other dogs to choose from, if every pitbull cross disappeared tommorow it would have no effect on anyone's life anywhere in the world.
For me, the question about a ban is, won't the a-holes that currently train (or don't) their pitbulls like attack animals just end up picking another breed? And we'll get a whole generation of Shepherds or Doberman's the become the most common attack dogs?
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:48 AM   #1594
MRCboicgy
Referee
 
MRCboicgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your enterprise AI
Exp:
Default

So when I was visiting my friends in Austin this past spring, I noticed a lot of their neightbours had pitbulls, they said there were about a dozen in their townhouse complex alone. People let them run loose in the off-leash and a few came up to us as we walked.

Really changed my opinion about them, as they were super sweet and playful, and just nice dogs all around. I think it's all about the owners, as the owners seemed like regular folks, no excess bro-ish or thug-ish looks - just hipster Austinites.

But it seems the average American is a more knowlegeable dog owner than the average Canadian - maybe just due to the sheer volume of dog owners down there.

How's that for broad sweeping strokes and generalizations?
__________________
You’re just old hate balls.
--Funniest mod complaint in CP history.
MRCboicgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:49 AM   #1595
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Then you support banning German Sheppards, Rotweilers, Labradors as well?

Death by a real dog- 1 in 116,448.
Death by a hot dog- 1 in 3,375.

Deaths are horrific, all animal attacks are, but are we not overreacting here just a tad?
Yes, I would support banning those breeds as well.

And great comparison stat -- death by animal attack versus death by choking.

A better comparison would be death by domestic cat. Of which, when I Google, can find no reported cases, and is not even carried as a statistic.

So, would we rather have no deaths from dogs by banning these stupid breeds, or be talking about an innocent person dying a horrible death every few months? Pretty easy decision if you ask me.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:49 AM   #1596
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
For me, the question about a ban is, won't the a-holes that currently train (or don't) their pitbulls like attack animals just end up picking another breed? And we'll get a whole generation of Shepherds or Doberman's the become the most common attack dogs?
They might.

You don't ignore a problem because another problem has the potential of arising.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:54 AM   #1597
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
They might.

You don't ignore a problem because another problem has the potential of arising.
But hasn't it always been a problem?

I remember as a kid it was Dobermans and Rottweilers that you had to be careful of. Was there a ban put on them? Honestly I don't know as I was quite young, but I never hear about them anymore (Doberman's at least, I've only seen one since owning a dog). It seems to me that all the exposure of dog-fighting really ramped up the pitbull ownership. I don't ever remember hearing boo about them when I was younger.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 09:59 AM   #1598
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

I'd be all for banning pit bulls. I'd also being all for banning all dogs. And all pet ownership. Because pets are gross and dumb.

But sure, why not ban pit bulls? Are they providing a particular service that other, less-capable-of-severe-damage dogs don't? I've honestly never seen a single defence of dangerous dog ownership that is more than "but I like them!"
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 10:05 AM   #1599
Nyah
First Line Centre
 
Nyah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The Kilt & Caber
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MRCboicgy View Post
SReally changed my opinion about them, as they were super sweet and playful, and just nice dogs all around. I think it's all about the owners, as the owners seemed like regular folks, no excess bro-ish or thug-ish looks - just hipster Austinites.
It's not just about the owners though, as has been demonstrated a number of times. A supposedly sweet, innocent, playful dog snaps and kills/attacks another dog or person. A friend of mine who lives in Revelstoke had a pit bull come into her yard where her older dog & son were playing and it attacked her dog. Luckily, my buddy was there visiting and after about a 10 minute struggle, literally punching this dog in the face & head with all his strength, managed to chase it off. This is a big, fit guy and the dog wasn't even phased by his blows. This dogs owner was also a 'hipster', not a douchy bro type, and was adamant that the dog had never attacked anyone before. Like in my previous story, this is a dog who had zero history, a great owner (supposedly) and it still attacked.
Nyah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 10:22 AM   #1600
Thor
God of Hating Twitter
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
Yes, I would support banning those breeds as well.

And great comparison stat -- death by animal attack versus death by choking.

A better comparison would be death by domestic cat. Of which, when I Google, can find no reported cases, and is not even carried as a statistic.

So, would we rather have no deaths from dogs by banning these stupid breeds, or be talking about an innocent person dying a horrible death every few months? Pretty easy decision if you ask me.
Cats are evil and should be banned, they kill millions of animals, birds, small animals. Then again these loud ass chirping birds outside my window in the summer here in Iceland is driving me crazy, maybe I should just get a cat.
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dog attack puppy barking


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy