06-09-2016, 09:11 AM
|
#1581
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Deaths by pitbull isn't a good statistic to pull. Its bites and damage that are more concerning.
The problem with pitbulls is that the damage they can do when they do go off. The rat sized dogs create puncture wounds the pitbulls tear off half a face.
So its the automatic weapon vs rifle situation.
I think owners should have the potential to be criminally responsible for the actions of their dogs.
Having a large, poorly secured, untrained dog is negligent.
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:13 AM
|
#1582
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Deaths by pitbull isn't a good statistic to pull. Its bites and damage that are more concerning.
The problem with pitbulls is that the damage they can do when they do go off. The rat sized dogs create puncture wounds the pitbulls tear off half a face.
So its the automatic weapon vs rifle situation.
I think owners should have the potential to be criminally responsible for the actions of their dogs.
Having a large, poorly secured, untrained dog is negligent.
|
This. Prosecute the ####ty owners to the full extent of the law.
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:17 AM
|
#1583
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
Small dog breeds are often the most aggressive, usually because the stupid owners treat them like they are harmless little plush toys. I've been bitten 2 times in my life, both times by little ####### dogs.
Maybe people should have to get a license to get a dog, which includes courses on raising them and how to be a good pet owner. Certainly if you have a bigger breed, but all people even ones with little dogs should be forced to learn how to raise a dog.
I can't tell you how many women I know have little tiny dogs who they think are the cutest things in the world, have done no proper raising of them and they run around like they own the place (dominant) and are aggressive as all hell.
I don't really have a dog in this fight, my exposure to pitbull breeds has been mostly in my childhood with our neighbors who had 2 amazing dogs, and one here in Iceland a friend of mine has.
I'm a golden retriever man myself, love the breed, but even that breed has violent attacks.
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:18 AM
|
#1584
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor
Small dog breeds are often the most aggressive, usually because the stupid owners treat them like they are harmless little plush toys. I've been bitten 2 times in my life, both times by little ####### dogs.
|
But I'm assuming those dogs didn't kill you in their encounters, would that be correct?
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:19 AM
|
#1585
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor
Then you support banning German Sheppards, Rotweilers, Labradors as well?
Death by a real dog- 1 in 116,448.
Death by a hot dog- 1 in 3,375.
Deaths are horrific, all animal attacks are, but are we not overreacting here just a tad?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steffe...b_8112394.html
|
We're not over reacting because there is no down side to banning pit bulls.
It's a fairly pointless breed in every respect, they aren't a good guard dog nor are they bright, they were bred by Victorians and before as a dog to put into an arena with other dogs or large animals to bet on, their one historic trait is aggression and fighting ability.
If they disappear there is no downside, we don't need a fighting dog anymore.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:29 AM
|
#1586
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
But I'm assuming those dogs didn't kill you in their encounters, would that be correct?
|
Just made me dead inside.
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:34 AM
|
#1587
|
Franchise Player
|
If you argue for gun control, then a pitbull ban should be simple.
"I like guns" "I like Pitbulls"
Except, even as someone who is for gun control, guns are way easier to defend to keep than Pitbulls.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:36 AM
|
#1588
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
So because one out of 115,000 approx die from dog attacks every year (of 78 million dogs owned in the US,) we should take action? Is there not a serious overreaction here?
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
Last edited by Thor; 06-09-2016 at 09:39 AM.
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:40 AM
|
#1589
|
Franchise Player
|
What's the overreaction?
Stop selling and breeding a useless breed that, regardless of whether it's the owner's fault or not, has proven pretty dangerous.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:41 AM
|
#1590
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor
So because one out of 115,000 approx die from dog attacks every year, we should take action? Is there not a serious overreaction here?
|
It's not just deaths, it's a combination of the attacks and the literal no downside to banning the breed. We have plenty of other dogs to choose from, if every pitbull cross disappeared tommorow it would have no effect on anyone's life anywhere in the world.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:44 AM
|
#1591
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
It's not just deaths, it's a combination of the attacks and the literal no downside to banning the breed. We have plenty of other dogs to choose from, if every pitbull cross disappeared tommorow it would have no effect on anyone's life anywhere in the world.
|
Exactly, because a pitbull ban would just mean that the terrible owners would move on to something else. Lots of dogs are just as dangerous, if not more so, than pits, so banning that particular breed wouldn't change a thing.
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:45 AM
|
#1592
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
So have Rottweilers and German Shepards. I'm assuming those 2 should be included?
Would you allow current owners to keep their dogs, and ban all future sales of these top say 5 large dog breeds which are the bulk of attacks resulting in deaths?
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:45 AM
|
#1593
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
It's not just deaths, it's a combination of the attacks and the literal no downside to banning the breed. We have plenty of other dogs to choose from, if every pitbull cross disappeared tommorow it would have no effect on anyone's life anywhere in the world.
|
For me, the question about a ban is, won't the a-holes that currently train (or don't) their pitbulls like attack animals just end up picking another breed? And we'll get a whole generation of Shepherds or Doberman's the become the most common attack dogs?
__________________
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:48 AM
|
#1594
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your enterprise AI
|
So when I was visiting my friends in Austin this past spring, I noticed a lot of their neightbours had pitbulls, they said there were about a dozen in their townhouse complex alone. People let them run loose in the off-leash and a few came up to us as we walked.
Really changed my opinion about them, as they were super sweet and playful, and just nice dogs all around. I think it's all about the owners, as the owners seemed like regular folks, no excess bro-ish or thug-ish looks - just hipster Austinites.
But it seems the average American is a more knowlegeable dog owner than the average Canadian - maybe just due to the sheer volume of dog owners down there.
How's that for broad sweeping strokes and generalizations?
__________________
You’re just old hate balls.
--Funniest mod complaint in CP history.
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:49 AM
|
#1595
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor
Then you support banning German Sheppards, Rotweilers, Labradors as well?
Death by a real dog- 1 in 116,448.
Death by a hot dog- 1 in 3,375.
Deaths are horrific, all animal attacks are, but are we not overreacting here just a tad?
|
Yes, I would support banning those breeds as well.
And great comparison stat -- death by animal attack versus death by choking.
A better comparison would be death by domestic cat. Of which, when I Google, can find no reported cases, and is not even carried as a statistic.
So, would we rather have no deaths from dogs by banning these stupid breeds, or be talking about an innocent person dying a horrible death every few months? Pretty easy decision if you ask me.
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:49 AM
|
#1596
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC
For me, the question about a ban is, won't the a-holes that currently train (or don't) their pitbulls like attack animals just end up picking another breed? And we'll get a whole generation of Shepherds or Doberman's the become the most common attack dogs?
|
They might.
You don't ignore a problem because another problem has the potential of arising.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 09:54 AM
|
#1597
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
They might.
You don't ignore a problem because another problem has the potential of arising.
|
But hasn't it always been a problem?
I remember as a kid it was Dobermans and Rottweilers that you had to be careful of. Was there a ban put on them? Honestly I don't know as I was quite young, but I never hear about them anymore (Doberman's at least, I've only seen one since owning a dog). It seems to me that all the exposure of dog-fighting really ramped up the pitbull ownership. I don't ever remember hearing boo about them when I was younger.
__________________
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 10:05 AM
|
#1599
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The Kilt & Caber
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRCboicgy
SReally changed my opinion about them, as they were super sweet and playful, and just nice dogs all around. I think it's all about the owners, as the owners seemed like regular folks, no excess bro-ish or thug-ish looks - just hipster Austinites.
|
It's not just about the owners though, as has been demonstrated a number of times. A supposedly sweet, innocent, playful dog snaps and kills/attacks another dog or person. A friend of mine who lives in Revelstoke had a pit bull come into her yard where her older dog & son were playing and it attacked her dog. Luckily, my buddy was there visiting and after about a 10 minute struggle, literally punching this dog in the face & head with all his strength, managed to chase it off. This is a big, fit guy and the dog wasn't even phased by his blows. This dogs owner was also a 'hipster', not a douchy bro type, and was adamant that the dog had never attacked anyone before. Like in my previous story, this is a dog who had zero history, a great owner (supposedly) and it still attacked.
|
|
|
06-09-2016, 10:22 AM
|
#1600
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube
Yes, I would support banning those breeds as well.
And great comparison stat -- death by animal attack versus death by choking.
A better comparison would be death by domestic cat. Of which, when I Google, can find no reported cases, and is not even carried as a statistic.
So, would we rather have no deaths from dogs by banning these stupid breeds, or be talking about an innocent person dying a horrible death every few months? Pretty easy decision if you ask me.
|
Cats are evil and should be banned, they kill millions of animals, birds, small animals. Then again these loud ass chirping birds outside my window in the summer here in Iceland is driving me crazy, maybe I should just get a cat.
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 PM.
|
|