Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2006, 02:38 PM   #141
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
I doubt it. The CBC is unionized and he's probably going to get a colossal severance package.
If he is on a contract basis, then it would depend upon teh tems in teh contract. Unless those are made public, we won't know if he got full pay, bought out, or nothing.

I think it was a stupid move by Nancy Lee. Brian Williams has shown himself to be a professional, I'm sure he would have done a fine job. I think Nancy Lee needs to be replaced.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 02:50 PM   #142
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
The reason they get hacked for it is because, according to the pro-CBCers, they're like the friendly uncle and it's all because they're not privatized.
I'm pro-CBC and I don't think they are like the friendly uncle because they are not privatized. Privatized or not, it's a huge corporation so I don't expect them to be the friendly uncle to every one of their employees.

I like the CBC for some of the content and because I think in Canada the CBC has a role to play. I'm not familiar with their hiring/firing practices.

That being said, I think Nancy Lee should be fired.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 03:12 PM   #143
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Nancy Lee, not my favorite person, definitely has an agenda.

http://www.caaws.ca/e/leadership/article.cfm?id=150
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 03:18 PM   #144
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
Nancy Lee, not my favorite person, definitely has an agenda.

http://www.caaws.ca/e/leadership/article.cfm?id=150
LOL. Wow, she sure accomplished a lot of those goals in the six years since that article has been put out. I love how they make mention of the the all-women sports channels that failed miserably.

I think it'd be great to see someone like Cassie Campbell on HNIC but has Lee done it? Nope.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 03:47 PM   #145
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Yeah, Cassie Campbell would be cool but Lee would probably shoehorn some knownothing with a similar agenda to hers into the show to appeal to the female audience.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 04:48 PM   #146
Sharpen 'Em
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

With all the talk of "our tax dollars"...I'm curious to know if anyone has any idea how much each of us actually pay a year to fund the CBC. Is it a flat rate for every Canadian who files?
Sharpen 'Em is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 04:58 PM   #147
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpen 'Em
With all the talk of "our tax dollars"...I'm curious to know if anyone has any idea how much each of us actually pay a year to fund the CBC. Is it a flat rate for every Canadian who files?
I think it comes from "general revenues" or whatever. There is no special fee/flat rate/CBC-dedicated vault for CBC. In 2005 they got a billion dollars. I don't know how many Canadians pay taxes but I'll take a stab and say 20 million so...
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 05:19 PM   #148
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Per person how much do you really think it costs to have it u pand running? If it costs me less than $20 a year than keep it!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 07:08 PM   #149
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT
Per person how much do you really think it costs to have it u pand running? If it costs me less than $20 a year than keep it!
Well if I'm paying for it, I demand they put on better shows, and increase the amount of hockey games they show.

Whats the chance of that happening? If CBC loses HNIC, they're done.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 08:11 PM   #150
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Well if I'm paying for it, I demand they put on better shows, and increase the amount of hockey games they show.
Oh you "demand" it, eh? Oooh, look out.

So are you going to stop paying taxes until they start showing super-awesome shows like 24 and CSI and also become a part-time NHL network?

I don't think you quite understand what the CBC is supposed to be. .
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 08:59 PM   #151
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Oh you "demand" it, eh? Oooh, look out.

So are you going to stop paying taxes until they start showing super-awesome shows like 24 and CSI and also become a part-time NHL network?

I don't think you quite understand what the CBC is supposed to be. .
I pay for it, surely I have some say, right?

I watch it, surely the consumer has some say, right?
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 09:22 PM   #152
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
I pay for it, surely I have some say, right?
I doubt you pay for it more than any other Canadian, but yeah you have a say. So do 30 million other people and very few of them want the CBC to run American-style dramas and hockey all the time.

Do you do anything more with your say than anonymously complain about their programming on a website devoted to the Calgary Flames?
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 04:22 AM   #153
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
You can turn on your TV, and most of the time, there are 4 or 5 American channels all showing the same thing.

Really?

I watch American TV all the time and have never rarely seen two channels showing the same show and that has only happened during the day when individual stations are showing syndicated shows and the channels came from two different markets.

I would love to know when 4 or 5 channels had were all showing the same thing. Especially since it happens all the time.

and Iguess the CBC does show "different" shows in terms of content. But to me one broing documentary/special is just as bad as another with a different boring subject matter.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 07:47 AM   #154
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
I doubt you pay for it more than any other Canadian, but yeah you have a say. So do 30 million other people and very few of them want the CBC to run American-style dramas and hockey all the time.
I'm curious if you can prove that for a fact.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 10:05 AM   #155
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
I doubt you pay for it more than any other Canadian, but yeah you have a say. So do 30 million other people and very few of them want the CBC to run American-style dramas and hockey all the time.

Do you do anything more with your say than anonymously complain about their programming on a website devoted to the Calgary Flames?
HNIC in Canada is clearly the most important show to CBC in terms of revenue and ratings. Why not put more hockey on? We all know Canada likes to watch hockey.

I can't say much for the American style dramas, since I can already watch them on satillite.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 07:23 PM   #156
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snakeeye
I'm curious if you can prove that for a fact.
Well I can't prove anything "for a fact", but I do know that at least 90% of the people in the country won't be watching the Stanley Cup Final, so I think it's safe to say that most people in the country aren't interested in even more hockey on that channel.

Re: American-style dramas -- I don't think I can prove that Canadians don't want another station (especially one run by the government) airing forensics shows and crime dramas based in New York City every night, but it's a reasonable assumption.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 07:33 PM   #157
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Well I can't prove anything "for a fact", but I do know that at least 90% of the people in the country won't be watching the Stanley Cup Final, so I think it's safe to say that most people in the country aren't interested in even more hockey on that channel.
But the Stanley Cup final is pulling better ratings then anything else on CBC. I would watch more hockey, so would you. Therefore you put something on CBC that people will watch.

Quote:
Re: American-style dramas -- I don't think I can prove that Canadians don't want another station (especially one run by the government) airing forensics shows and crime dramas based in New York City every night, but it's a reasonable assumption.
Base them in Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary. We don't need to base it on American cities. Make it a Canadian crime drama, or a Canadian forensics show.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 11:35 PM   #158
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
But the Stanley Cup final is pulling better ratings then anything else on CBC. I would watch more hockey, so would you. Therefore you put something on CBC that people will watch.
Yeah but the goal isn't to get you and I to watch all the time, or to draw the most viewers. The original goal (made a little sketchy by the inclusion of commercials of course) is to appeal to all Canadians with a wide variety of programming. The mandate, and it might even be a "law" outlined in the Canadian Broadcasting Act, is to air diverse programming that appeals to everyone and not just to Alberta hockey-nerds like you and I.

Come to think of it, I think there has been some amount of griping about the CBC showing too much hockey.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Base them in Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary. We don't need to base it on American cities. Make it a Canadian crime drama, or a Canadian forensics show.
I think they do that, but not many people watch it. Some people do though and that's the point of CBC.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 11:53 AM   #159
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Yeah but the goal isn't to get you and I to watch all the time, or to draw the most viewers. The original goal (made a little sketchy by the inclusion of commercials of course) is to appeal to all Canadians with a wide variety of programming. The mandate, and it might even be a "law" outlined in the Canadian Broadcasting Act, is to air diverse programming that appeals to everyone and not just to Alberta hockey-nerds like you and I.

Come to think of it, I think there has been some amount of griping about the CBC showing too much hockey.
There is nothing wrong with having a different Canadian team playing every night on CBC. 3 hours out of their schedule. I'm not talking about a 24/7 hockey station, but I do think CBC should show more hockey then just Saturday night.

Quote:
I think they do that, but not many people watch it. Some people do though and that's the point of CBC.
If I had my way, I would spend a large amount of money on one particular show, and make it highly appealing and interesting. Draw people to watch CBC. Even though they're a government run organization, there is no reason they can't try to make money.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy