Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2024, 11:01 AM   #141
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

One of the elements in a successful rebuild is prospects developing into more than they were anticipated to. That seems to be happening with Pospisil. That doesn’t make him untouchable, but it does mean he could be part of the solution.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 11:05 AM   #142
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
I find it strange how Markstrom has almost no value, retention on Markstrom has almost no value and apparently Pospisil has little value.

Ottawa traded (at the time) the 12th overall pick (although they were tied in points with the 10th overall pick along with 2 second round picks for two full seasons of Chychrun. Ottawa was 5 points out of the playoffs with 22 games left at the time and had to pass 3 other teams and stay ahead of the two teams they were tied with to make the playoffs. They knew they were trading a high pick in a stronger draft than this years draft and still did it. I think people way over value the 10th overall pick based on recent history and how NHL teams seem to value those picks.
Chychrun was 24 and the Sens expected to get more than two seasons out of him.

Nobody is saying Markstrom has no value. If he gets a protected 2025 1st and a B prospect that will be more than almost any goalie has returned in a trade in a decade.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 11:07 AM   #143
Macho0978
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
One of the elements in a successful rebuild is prospects developing into more than they were anticipated to. That seems to be happening with Pospisil. That doesn’t make him untouchable, but it does mean he could be part of the solution.
I get that 10OV would be a great addition but it also could be nothing over time.

All great teams have a mix. You posted in another thread, Buffalo doesn't need a top 6 forward they need Coleman type players. I've posted this before as well, this is exactly what is missing in Buffalo. Tanev types on the point too.

Some players need to bring something different to the table and Pospsil does so much that is different from our other players, and he can play as well and maybe turns into a 20-25 goal guy. Hard to find this type of player too.

He's a keeper IMO
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 11:08 AM   #144
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

I wish our draft strategy in later rounds tilted more to finding ass kickers and dicks to play against like Pospisils vs Josh Nodler types. Zach Fischer was a decent gamble.

Just sort prospects by PIM's and start going down the list at least and grab a couple each year. Pospisil with 253 PIM's in 49 games in his draft year!
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 11:12 AM   #145
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Nvm
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 11:16 AM   #146
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post

Ottawa traded (at the time) the 12th overall pick (although they were tied in points with the 10th overall pick along with 2 second round picks for two full seasons of Chychrun.
If Markstrom was a lot younger then I'd agree with the comparable but he is not. Schnieder was 27 or something and putting up great stats and he got the 9th overall.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 11:19 AM   #147
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Chychrun was 24 and the Sens expected to get more than two seasons out of him.

Nobody is saying Markstrom has no value. If he gets a protected 2025 1st and a B prospect that will be more than almost any goalie has returned in a trade in a decade.
One year of Kuemper at got a 1st, a conditional 3rd and a former 32nd overall pick who played in every playoff game for the Colorado Avalanche a month before the trade as a 22 year old. Kuemper had some injury problems but almost had as high of a save percentage as his backup the year before the trade.

The Flames are trying to trade a better goalie, a significantly lower percentage of the cap than what Kuemper was (if they retain 50%). Surely if Kuemper gets what would be the equivalent of a former 1st round pick and a 1st round pick plus a conditional pick that would be the absolute floor for a Markstrom trade.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 11:24 AM   #148
Macho0978
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
One year of Kuemper at got a 1st, a conditional 3rd and a former 32nd overall pick who played in every playoff game for the Colorado Avalanche a month before the trade as a 22 year old. Kuemper had some injury problems but almost had as high of a save percentage as his backup the year before the trade.

The Flames are trying to trade a better goalie, a significantly lower percentage of the cap than what Kuemper was (if they retain 50%). Surely if Kuemper gets what would be the equivalent of a former 1st round pick and a 1st round pick plus a conditional pick that would be the absolute floor for a Markstrom trade.
Timmins was also was not performing that well in the AHL and his value had dropped since his draft year.

I wonder what the Flames would have to add to 28th OV to get 10OV? In picks and prospects? Huge difference in the Kuemper return vs the suggested Markstrom return. Flames would have to add another late first to trade up that far. The 1st Arizona got was end of the 1st round.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 11:26 AM   #149
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Markstrom
Andersson
28th overall

Mercer
Allen
10th overall

Who says no?
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 11:26 AM   #150
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
One year of Kuemper at got a 1st, a conditional 3rd and a former 32nd overall pick who played in every playoff game for the Colorado Avalanche a month before the trade as a 22 year old. Kuemper had some injury problems but almost had as high of a save percentage as his backup the year before the trade.

The Flames are trying to trade a better goalie, a significantly lower percentage of the cap than what Kuemper was (if they retain 50%). Surely if Kuemper gets what would be the equivalent of a former 1st round pick and a 1st round pick plus a conditional pick that would be the absolute floor for a Markstrom trade.
A conditional 2025 1st and Holtz (recent 7OA pick) sounds like a better return than Kuemper got.

We have no idea if retention is even on the table. I’m starting to doubt that it is.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 11:33 AM   #151
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
A conditional 2025 1st and Holtz (recent 7OA pick) sounds like a better return than Kuemper got.

We have no idea if retention is even on the table. I’m starting to doubt that it is.


Okay let's say the package for Markstrom is 2025 conditional 1st + prospect.

Would everyone prefer holtz or Seamus?
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 11:37 AM   #152
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Devil's just signed Casey. Don't think he's on the table.

Holtz is on the table. So Holtz.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 11:40 AM   #153
Macho0978
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Markstrom
Andersson
28th overall

Mercer
Allen
10th overall

Who says no?
Devils don't need a top 4 dman so I think they say no.

With Michael McLeod being done with the team, Palat ending up being a bad signing, Holtz looking like he's not top line good and maybe not even top 6. The Devils need to keep young forwards and add goalies. IMO they are set on D.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 12:19 PM   #154
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
Timmins was also was not performing that well in the AHL and his value had dropped since his draft year.

I wonder what the Flames would have to add to 28th OV to get 10OV? In picks and prospects? Huge difference in the Kuemper return vs the suggested Markstrom return. Flames would have to add another late first to trade up that far. The 1st Arizona got was end of the 1st round.
He was not performing well in the AHL because he was not playing there, he was in the NHL when he was traded, that was why he played every single playoff game with the Avs that year and played in about 65% of the regular season games (pretty much every game once he was recalled).

The first Arizona got was for the next year, one could not have predicted where it would be outside it would probably be late in the first round.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 12:22 PM   #155
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
A conditional 2025 1st and Holtz (recent 7OA pick) sounds like a better return than Kuemper got.

We have no idea if retention is even on the table. I’m starting to doubt that it is.
Timmins was a 22 year old dman who averaged 0.23 PPG in the NHL the season before he got traded.

Holtz is a 22 year old scoring forward who averaged 0.34 PPG in the NHL last season.

Not sure it is a much better return, if at all.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 12:44 PM   #156
Kipper_3434
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Where does Holtz play on the flames? We already have too many wingers, would likely have to burry Coronato or Pelletier in the minors. Should target a D-man as the add or just ask for all picks.
Kipper_3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 12:44 PM   #157
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
Devils don't need a top 4 dman so I think they say no.

With Michael McLeod being done with the team, Palat ending up being a bad signing, Holtz looking like he's not top line good and maybe not even top 6. The Devils need to keep young forwards and add goalies. IMO they are set on D.
Dougie Hamilton has missed 82 games over the last three years, and if Hamilton doesn’t play, the Devils season gets ruined.

It’s no coincidence the one time Hamilton was healthy and available, they went to the second round.

So to my thinking, the Devils need an extra reliable, affordable top-4 D who they could absolutely retain through his prime, to help cover for Dougie’s inevitable injury.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 12:58 PM   #158
DionTheDman
First Line Centre
 
DionTheDman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Pospisil is attractive, but ultimately I don't think anybody's claiming he will be a core piece. When we're trying to acquire high-end core pieces to build around, these are the kinds of assets you have to give up. If we could acquire top shelf picks by just giving up old/crappy assets, we would do it all day long. That's before considering that he could be one hit away from retirement. All things considered, the team is at the stage when we're trying to acquire top end young talent. Not keep boom/bust mid 20's players.
DionTheDman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2024, 01:07 PM   #159
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Pretty well every player is a hit away from retirement.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2024, 01:07 PM   #160
Macho0978
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Dougie Hamilton has missed 82 games over the last three years, and if Hamilton doesn’t play, the Devils season gets ruined.

It’s no coincidence the one time Hamilton was healthy and available, they went to the second round.

So to my thinking, the Devils need an extra reliable, affordable top-4 D who they could absolutely retain through his prime, to help cover for Dougie’s inevitable injury.
Hughes and Nemec both have the potential to be top pairing guys. Why pay for Andersson? He does nothing that the other 3 guys mentioned (dougie) already do.

If they add d, they also need a Tanev type. Rasmus won't touch their PP with 3 major injuries. They need a PK/Shut down dman if they trade for anything.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy