11-28-2017, 11:00 PM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Rough night for ferland, can't clear the puck and then it's his man who scores later in the shift as he's in no man's land. Backbreaking
Any news on Bennett?
|
Word is he didn't do anything this month, hoping for better things next month.
So he's month to month.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to memphusk For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:01 PM
|
#142
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
And it's a serious lol that we're paying Brouwer $4.5. Treliving should be ashamed. I said day 1 of this signing that it would be terrible.
|
It's looking like Brouwer signing and the hamonic trades are major miscalculations by the flames gm over the past 2 offseasons.
I think hamonic could be better still though, hopefully.
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:02 PM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psytic
Im just curious what you feel is the issue with the team?
Do you feel that they are playing to potential and GG is getting the best of out this group?
Either this group isn't as good as it looks on paper, and no other coach can change it = on the GM. Or, they are better than this and the coach isn't getting the best out of them.
|
they are 3 games over .500 and I think they have some big holes in the bottom 6
GG is an average coach...Flames didn't lose this game because of coaching, the Leafs players played better. They likely win if I was behind the Leafs bench tonight.
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:07 PM
|
#144
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Yeah the leafs are a good, budding on great, team. No shame losing to them. Their rebuild worked out better. They hit their top picks and plucked some key guys later in the draft. Essentially they were luckier than the Flames.
It's going to be a long five years for Leaf haters. Most of the pieces are all there to be a contender.
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:07 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
|
Does anyone know what Hamonic does better than Stone? Maybe skating I guess. Stone is bigger, more physical, and can give you something offensively with his great shot. I didn't understand the Hamonic trade because the Flames already had a no.4 guy in Stone. The Hamonic trade is really starting to irk me because this team could've taken that next step if they used those draft picks correctly. That being by trading for a legit top 6 player. A first and the 3 seconds from the Lazar and Hamonic deal would've done that without a doubt.
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:10 PM
|
#146
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Stone is somewhat of an insurance policy on hamonic, but I also wonder if he was retained for the flexibility it gives the flames to make a trade.
For me, Brodie is the odd man out on the roster. Just too unreliable defensively.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:10 PM
|
#147
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Matthews didn't have a shot for the first time in his career
suck it Leafs!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
Yeah the leafs are a good, budding on great, team. No shame losing to them. Their rebuild worked out better. They hit their top picks and plucked some key guys later in the draft. Essentially they were luckier than the Flames.
It's going to be a long five years for Leaf haters. Most of the pieces are all there to be a contender.
|
I disagree, the Flames have hit on many young players and have a better defense. It's up to management to figure out a way to get the best out of this group. That's something Toronto has done and the Flames have not. It's very easy to see which team is a Babcock coached team and which team is a GG one.
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:11 PM
|
#148
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
they are 3 games over .500 and I think they have some big holes in the bottom 6
GG is an average coach...Flames didn't lose this game because of coaching, the Leafs players played better. They likely win if I was behind the Leafs bench tonight.
|
The WAR for coaches is so so small. I know advanced metrics in hockey are still in development but an elite forward/goalie is a 4, defenceman is a 3, what do you think an NHL coach is, maybe 3? There's no coach that is worth Erik Karlsson. The way people are talking today Gulutzan is responsible for 9 of our losses. That's basically impossible.
GG has probably a WAR of 1.5, Babcok is a 3.3.5
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to corporatejay For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:11 PM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beninho
Does anyone know what Hamonic does better than Stone? Maybe skating I guess. Stone is bigger, more physical, and can give you something offensively with his great shot. I didn't understand the Hamonic trade because the Flames already had a no.4 guy in Stone. The Hamonic trade is really starting to irk me because this team could've taken that next step if they used those draft picks correctly. That being by trading for a legit top 6 player. A first and the 3 seconds from the Lazar and Hamonic deal would've done that without a doubt.
|
You have said this like 50 times tonight
Hamonic is certainly still a more valuable asset now...I think it will take more than 20 games to make the call
Also, Stone was a UFA when the deal was done so Stone was still an unknown
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:11 PM
|
#150
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I've been on the fence about the coaching, but I've come to the regrettable conclusion that almost the entire coaching staff is a mess of disorganized plans, poor anticipation and a complete lack of fresh ideas. And far too often they are asleep for the first 40 minutes of a game - that's on the coaches, too.
The D wail around in their end with no structure, plan or method when they get pinned - they simply panic and race around aimlessly. Every once in a while they remember to hit someone or get their sticks moving, but they are s-o-f-t. Hamilton has become VERY lazy. He waits for the puck FAR too often, and makes lazy stick plays on incoming forwards. That is on bad coaching, as he does it regularly, so must be being told to do so - it's not going to stop anyone talented or an organized attack.
In the other end, the PP, without Versteeg the last two games has no idea what to do. They can't make a breakout work, can't cross the blue line effectively to gain the zone -- and once again, that's gotta be on execution after coaching.
And the Greasers are only 5 points behind.
It would seem odd to toast coaches at this point in the season, with the Flames still "doing well" in the standings. But maybe if the team "wants" to do better, that's the answer.
Beats me why these guys can't get it together. Too highbrow a plan for a bunch of hockey players?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to taxbuster For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:12 PM
|
#151
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Second line and down there's issues. Backlunds line should be the third line. Bennett and Lazar flatlining has left a huge gap in scoring and we don't have the replacement parts to fix the problem. Janko looks good but appears to need some better linemates(yeah Jagr is there but I have a feeling he's going to miss a bunch of games).
The fourth line even with Versteeg is not good. Hamilton and Stajan aren't the answer. And Brouwer is serving one purpose but not worth his contract.
Treliving went all in on the D corps and I think it's kind of backfiring. Really think Hamonic should be the third pairing RHD and anchoring defensively someone like Kylington. Stone and Brodie have shown much better chemistry and I don't know why the coaching staff isn't matching successful pairings instead of trying to make a square peg go into a round hole.
There's a few serious issues that need fixing with the Flames for sure, you can see the parts are there, they just need to adjust the settings.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:13 PM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
|
Familton 15.4%, Lazar 18.8% and Stajan 20% Corsi.
That is just plain unplayable dog crap.
Stajan is done and Freddie & Lazar are no good too.
No serviceable 4th line centres anymore, and not even much better with 4th liners Versteeg & Brouwer either.
Entire group of 4th liners on the Flames flat out and straight up suck. No good.
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:14 PM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay
The WAR for coaches is so so small. I know advanced metrics in hockey are still in development but an elite forward/goalie is a 4, defenceman is a 3, what do you think an NHL coach is, maybe 3? There's no coach that is worth Erik Karlsson. The way people are talking today Gulutzan is responsible for 9 of our losses. That's basically impossible.
GG has probably a WAR of 1.5, Babcok is a 3.3.5
|
Babcok has been a good coach in his career when he has had good players...like most coaches
When the Wings were on the decline he hit the road
When he had #### talent he finished DEAD LAST
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:17 PM
|
#154
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
You have said this like 50 times tonight
Hamonic is certainly still a more valuable asset now...I think it will take more than 20 games to make the call
|
I've said it maybe 4 times because I believe this was a massive #### up by Treliving. I doubt any team is clammoring to get Hamonic if they have properly scouted the Flames. At this point Treliving has a lot of big wins and a lot of big misses. This Hamonic trade will go down along the lines of Brouwer if he does not pick up his play drastically. A first and two seconds can not be understated, that's a humongous payment for a player that looks so painfully average. The Isles worked the Flames big time for a player that was already showing regression last season. Sorry that I'm extremely annoyed that this team had the assets to take the next step but used them improperly.
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:20 PM
|
#155
|
Franchise Player
|
Far worse players than Hamonic have fetched first round picks
I also think he will improve, 21 games
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:21 PM
|
#156
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Lazar for a second should probably be a scandal at this point.
Looking like Reto Bera for a 2nd levels of bad.
Does anyone know what his advanced stats are like? Because 2 points in 17 games and a -5 with 14 shots is bad. Feel for the guy but he should be in the minors.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:22 PM
|
#158
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Babcok has been a good coach in his career when he has had good players...like most coaches
When the Wings were on the decline he hit the road
When he had #### talent he finished DEAD LAST
|
Suppose Mike Babcock coached this team, any improvement?
|
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:22 PM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Didn't like the Hamonic trade either. But he is serviceable. Just on the third pairing with a younger D man he can cover.
The Brodie Hamonic pairing hasnt earned a passing grade at all. And I don't think they're meant to be paired.
Stone should be with Brodie. They looked great during their time and it was far more natural of a fit from the get go.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-28-2017, 11:23 PM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Babcok has been a good coach in his career when he has had good players...like most coaches
When the Wings were on the decline he hit the road
When he had #### talent he finished DEAD LAST
|
Right, you probably had players on that team with negative WAR. I'm agreeing with you. Take the best team in the NHL, have them coach Dallas Eakins v. Babock (or Torts or whoever is the best in the NHL right now).
The team with Eakins will probably have 3 less wins than the team with Babock. That's it. So this idea of blaming GG after every loss is insane. He, at worst, will cost this team 2 wins over the course of the 82 game season. If you need ~43 wins to make the playoffs, GG is probably only responsible for getting them 1.5 The other 35-40 need to come from 23 guys on the roster.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to corporatejay For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 AM.
|
|