Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2017, 05:09 AM   #141
gt4flames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kelowna, BC
Exp:
Default

$110 for PL isn't a nice pill to swallow....but towards the end of the season I saw 2nd market PL tickets going for $70...

...yes were in a recession, but there is still lots of money in this city willing to pay for tickets.

I paid $400 for a pair of lower bowl tickets for game 3, and $440 for game 4 lower bowl.

I made choices budget wise to buy those tickets. I don't feel ripped off. I get to watch my favourite team play in the arena I grew up in compete for the greatest trophy in sports.

I guess you(OP) won't be purchasing cup final tickets....

..I will be doing everything in my power to make sure I will be

and a lesson my father taught me...

"No one cares. work harder"

Last edited by gt4flames; 04-15-2017 at 05:14 AM.
gt4flames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gt4flames For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2017, 06:36 AM   #142
aaron5425
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gt4flames View Post
$110 for PL isn't a nice pill to swallow....but towards the end of the season I saw 2nd market PL tickets going for $70...
"
There were also a number of games where this was the PL price at the gate during the regular season.
aaron5425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 07:06 AM   #143
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

While I'm firmly in the camp of the Flames should set prices to meet demand and fans don't deserve cheap tickets, some of the "just work harder if you want to afford tickets" posts bug me. Plenty of rich people did not work hard to get there and plenty of poor people are incredibly hard workers. While hard working is a great character trait it's not a golden ticket to financial success.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to FireGilbert For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2017, 08:20 AM   #144
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

The market has set the price of Flames tickets. That price is much higher, relative to average incomes, than it was 30 years ago. So fewer Calgarians can afford to see the Flames play live today than in the past.

There's nothing at all wrong with that from a business point of view. However, it certainly is a factor in public perceptions about the community merits of a new arena. Watching a live NHL game is seen as a luxury experience for the wealthy. The public appetite for subsidizing the luxury experiences of the wealthy is not high.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 04-15-2017 at 08:23 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 08:35 AM   #145
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkknight View Post
If your entertainment budget can't afford $110 tickets, I'm pretty sure you have more to be concerned about than getting tickets. I don't find that price unreasonable. As stated above the price will be set as long as they continue to sell, so it may in fact be you who are out of touch of the market.
I would have to say you're probably the one who is out of touch if you have the mentality of handing money out based on whatever someone is asking.

People are complaining now. Wait until the equivalent seat is $110 for game one of the regular season and the playoff seat is $300 when CSEC gets it's way.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 10:38 AM   #146
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

What I don't get is people complaining that they wish tickets were cheaper so the average fan could go. However, if the tickets were cheaper it would have sold out in 10 seconds like it did in Edmonton and anyone who wanted to go would have to pay twice as much as they have to pay now.

Because when demand greatly exceeds supply, it's the ticket brokers who have the best means to buy the tickets.
Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 10:43 AM   #147
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751 View Post
What I don't get is people complaining that they wish tickets were cheaper so the average fan could go. However, if the tickets were cheaper it would have sold out in 10 seconds like it did in Edmonton and anyone who wanted to go would have to pay twice as much as they have to pay now.

Because when demand greatly exceeds supply, it's the ticket brokers who have the best means to buy the tickets.
Ticketmaster's monopoly and the way they #### over fans and sell to scalpers is another argument entirely.

Suffice to say that if the Flames really wanted to, they could sell allotments of tickets at reasonable prices to real fans. A number of factors prevent this.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 10:46 AM   #148
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

"A luxury for the wealthy"?

Most of the lower bowl seats are corporate and 2nd bowl and PL tickets to regular season games can be had from 30-200 bucks. Lets not act like the only people going to Flames games are the affluent bourgeoisie.

There are thousands upon thousands of middle class families in this city that could afford to go to a game a month. Lots just choose to spend their money elsewhere.

Last edited by polak; 04-15-2017 at 10:50 AM.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:12 AM   #149
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
"A luxury for the wealthy"?

Most of the lower bowl seats are corporate and 2nd bowl and PL tickets to regular season games can be had from 30-200 bucks. Lets not act like the only people going to Flames games are the affluent bourgeoisie.

There are thousands upon thousands of middle class families in this city that could afford to go to a game a month. Lots just choose to spend their money elsewhere.
Who cares about regular season games? This thread is about playoff tickets.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:45 AM   #150
puds
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I was looking at an old receipt from 2008 - the face value was 46 bucks each. This year it is 94.50. Kind of ridiculous inflation.
puds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:47 AM   #151
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puds View Post
I was looking at an old receipt from 2008 - the face value was 46 bucks each. This year it is 94.50. Kind of ridiculous inflation.
Salary cap has gone up $23 million since then. Who do you think ultimately pays for that? It's why I selfishly always am on the side of the owners in collective bargaining because any wins for the players usually end up costing the fans.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:51 AM   #152
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

9% inflation per year. Probably close to the salary increase over that time.
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:51 AM   #153
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
This is my biggest gripe as well.

If you check this forum alone, you can get Tues or Wed tickets to a lower demand opponent very cheap. Park in the 5$ lot and each have 1 beer, and the whole night is under $100 for 2 people.

But when the playoffs come, all the fans who don't support the team every night want in on the fun!

I'd be fine to have a lottery where you only get entries from buying regular season games (1 entry per ticket per game you attended) and sell those at the STH price.

But to expect the Flames to lower prices for fans who actually don't support them financially when they are struggling or during non peak games?
There are multiple posters I could quote but I'm just going to quote this one.

How does the fact that STHs have to sell for less than FV and sometimes less than cost during the regular season relate to playoff prices being outrageous? I'm not sure why you and others seem to think there is some correlation. Especially since if posts on CP are to be believed, the cost of STH playoff tickets barely went up at all and are literally hundreds of dollars below the FV.

Someone posted that their costs is like $120/ticket for whites (?) and the FV is $249. Seems like you'll make back any money you didn't make during the regular season.

You specifically mention fans who don't support the team financially when they are struggling or during non-peak games, but you only referenced not being able to sell tickets on the secondary market, which sounds like you are more concerned those fans wouldn't support you financially, not the flames. If you were concerned about the flames you would have referenced the direct market and attendance figures. Buying off the secondary market doesn't help the flames at all, they have already collected that revenue, it only helps the people trying to sell their tickets.

But I'm gonna get back to STH holders in a second. Let's start with a few other things.

1) Supply and Demand doesn't actually apply here, at least not in the sense a lot of people are using it. Definitely not in relation to the cost of tickets in the regular season as set by the Flames. I'll come back to the secondary market later. That's because the Flames don't lower prices when the team stinks or the building isn't full. So first people really need to stop saying that this is a purely capitalistic supply and demand issue. It really isn't. That's why it can be frustrating. When the team stinks or the weather is bad or the opponent sucks, like a Thurs night game in Nov against Colorado, the Flames don't lower prices. So to say this is purely what the market can bare is false. There is no open market here. Ticket prices only go up, never down.

2) I've already addressed the fact that the Flames aren't a normal business model in my previous post, especially in relation to their attempts to extort public money to help their bottom line. I won't go into detail again but it is worth mentioning why people feel entitled to not have prices double for the 1st round of the playoffs.

3) Describing this as people feeling entitled or that it is their "right" to have cheap ticket is a little unfair - except as it relates to point 2) and my previous post on why the Flames could be argued do owe it to their city to make tickets affordable. This is about regular fans just voicing their displeasure that ticket prices are too high. I don't see why that's wrong.

4) STHs. This one is tough because I definitely don't want to paint all STHs with the same brush, but it is totally wrong of those in this thread (and others) complaining that they are sacrificing during the season and as such feel that the non-STHs have no right to complain.

Being a STH is a risk. In exchange for tickets way, way below face (and often market) value, you have to buy the whole season. Now most STHs that I know, and I was one myself for about 5 years, don't plan to attend 41 games. So what do STHs do? Well we sell our unwanted tickets for a profit to help subsidize our costs. Most seasons I was a STH I was able to attend about 15 games a year for FREE. After I sold the other 25 games for FV, plus what I'd charge the person(s) I took with me (I usually gave them a price below FV but a bit above my cost), I was able to go to Flames games for several years totally for free.

Was it a pain to have to put up several thousand dollars months in advance with no guarantee that I'd be able to sell them? Did it suck to have to sell some games below face or give them away? Sure but I certainly wouldn't complain about it on CP like I was making some noble sacrifice.

I sold all of my tickets on CP. I didn't scalp any of them. And I never just kept all the Friday/Sat/Rival/Original 6 etc games for myself, as several people who sell on CP do. I would sell premium games right along with the Thursday night games in November against the Avs. I'm not saying this because I want to say I'm better than others, it is your prerogative what games you sell. The point is that I was not willing to risk taking a full loss on any of the less desirable games. As such, I made the choice to sacrifice some of the premium games to package them with the less desirable games to ensure all my tickets would sell.

Now, I'm not sure what any of that has to do with the Flames pricing their playoff tickets to non-STHs extremely high and non-STHs complaining about that pricing. But for whatever reason, it keeps being brought up in this thread. Only thing I can think of is that a few of you STHs (who have said as much) feel like it is vindication to be able to make several hundred dollars per game for your sacrifice of taking a loss a few times in the last few years. Otherwise, why do you care that fans are complaining about prices and what does you paying way, way less than we do have anything to do with it?

At the end of the day the STH relationship on CP is mutually beneficial. STHs get to sell their regular season and playoff tickets for a tidy profit (most of the time) and diehard fans get to avoid paying the ridiculous ticketmaster fees. It is really a great thing that benefits us both and having been on both sides of the situation, I'm glad that a forum like CP exists to help fans avoid the rip off that is ticketmaster and other scalping sites. But I never would pretend that me selling my tickets on CP was some noble sacrifice. I was making a profit, a reasonable one and I would never ask the mods to let me sell my tickets for even higher so I could further extend that profit. Before I was a STH I liked knowing I could come here and get FV tickets, even if I knew I was helping subsidize a STHs costs and even if that person was only selling the M-Th games against non-premium opponents, and I gladly reciprocated when I was a STH.

But what I won't do is pretend just because STHs take a loss sometimes on the secondary market, that somehow the non-STHs deserve the insane prices for playoff tickets. I don't think those two things have anything to do with each other. The risk I take as a STH is known to me and I don't begrudge non-STHs for not becoming STHs. No non-STH ever told me I was a whiny entitled brat for being a STH and paying a lower price than they did. And I'll never call them entitled and whiny for wanting playoff tickets to be set at prices that seem reasonable.

Demand does go up during the playoffs and for some STHs I can see how it is frustrating that for parts of the year you could barely give your tickets away, and now you've got friends and family hounding you for cheap tickets, but that isn't what this thread is about. This is about regular fans, who don't have access to season tickets, for a variety of reasons, complaining that the Flames have over leveraged their advantage and have left regular fans out in the cold.

What reason could you possibly have to belittle fans who are upset they can't afford to go? Are you really that bitter that those fans may have not sacrificed their money during the season to go and you had to sell for a small(er) profit or even a loss?

Last edited by Cecil Terwilliger; 04-15-2017 at 11:55 AM.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:52 AM   #154
puds
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Salary cap has gone up $23 million since then. Who do you think ultimately pays for that? It's why I selfishly always am on the side of the owners in collective bargaining because any wins for the players usually end up costing the fans.
Yeah, a 28% increase which is totally reasonable. By that metric a playoff ticket should cost 59 bucks in 2017. If the salary cap tracked the increase in ticket price it would be ~116 million right now not 73.
puds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:53 AM   #155
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I've never sold a ticket and go to every game.

Just explaining why I don't think it makes sense for people to complain about the prices for single games when the prices aren't rediculous if you have ST.

Makes perfect business sense to me. Reasonable prices for the people who support the team every game. Expensive tickets for people who want to attend minimal games.

Last edited by Jason14h; 04-15-2017 at 11:57 AM.
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:54 AM   #156
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puds View Post
Yeah, a 28% increase which is totally reasonable. By that metric a playoff ticket should cost 59 bucks in 2017. If the salary cap tracked the increase in ticket price it would be ~116 million right now not 73.
Well the salary cap isn't the only thing going up as minimum wage, crap dollar, etc are all things that have to be taken into consideration. The dollar in particular plays a large role as the salary cap is in US dollars. CDN dollar was in a much better place in 2008.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 11:58 AM   #157
herashak
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Totally fair, but it reinforces that public money isn't needed for a new building.
herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 12:08 PM   #158
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by herashak View Post
Totally fair, but it reinforces that public money isn't needed for a new building.
How so? If the Flames remain in the dome really the only avenue they have at making more money is to raise ticket prices. With a new arena with more suites and lower bowl seats will enable them to make considerably more money here as they aren't making much money on the upper bowl seats at the dome.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2017, 12:37 PM   #159
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
How so? If the Flames remain in the dome really the only avenue they have at making more money is to raise ticket prices. With a new arena with more suites and lower bowl seats will enable them to make considerably more money here as they aren't making much money on the upper bowl seats at the dome.
But but but the Flames are a community asset. It's not about the money, it's about civic pride! Philanthropy! Making more money isn't a concern of Flames ownership. It's all for the good of the community.

Personally, I can't afford a luxury suite, but I can totally see why my tax dollars should go towards building an arena so the people who can afford one will have a nicer place to watch the game. Why should the people who can afford the luxury suite have to pay for it themselves? Why shouldn't everyone pitch in for my cable bill so I can watch every Flames game? It's all about the community!
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RougeUnderoos For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2017, 12:47 PM   #160
herashak
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
How so? If the Flames remain in the dome really the only avenue they have at making more money is to raise ticket prices. With a new arena with more suites and lower bowl seats will enable them to make considerably more money here as they aren't making much money on the upper bowl seats at the dome.
So a new building would mean higher prices and even higher profit margins for the Flames. To me it seems like if they do it right and build something that can last for 30+ years ticket taxes and extra revenue will pay for it.

The salary cap has doubled in the last 10 years, and the NHL can't work out sending some players to the olympics. This is a business and like most successful businesses is focused on maximizing profits, with fans somewhere after. It's going to be going on for the duration of the next building. The way I see it is that in 20 years the NHL is going to be the same money hog and the Flames will be doing perfectly fine. Whether they get public money now or not.
herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy