03-07-2016, 08:21 PM
|
#141
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit
I don't get it. What'd he do, draw too many penalties? Wtf
|
more like, what did wideman do amirite?
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:21 PM
|
#142
|
|
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryno
It would be nice to see Hartley criticize the refs.. Even if it means a fine.
|
I'd like to see the Flames entire organization do it. It's serious BS. Makes the game look cheap and rigged.
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:21 PM
|
#143
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
The game misconduct is automatic for instigating if you wear a visor I believe.
The problem is the instigator. Burns jumped him!
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:22 PM
|
#144
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
|
Hathaway gets a game? Gross.
Bennett, Gaudreau, Monahan, hot to watch.
__________________
Death by 4th round picks.
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:22 PM
|
#145
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
|
Misconduct for...standing up for himself after being on a receiving end of two cheap shots.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:22 PM
|
#146
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: nexus of the universe
|
If you want to give Hathaway an instigator to offset the Burns cheap turn away from puck and shoulder Hathaway so be it. To call an instigator and ignore that illegal hit is laughable.
__________________
Would there even be no trade clauses if Edmonton was out of the NHL? - fotze
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:22 PM
|
#147
|
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Mar 2016
Exp: 
|
Is it because one guy has a visor and the other doesn't?
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:22 PM
|
#148
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
The game misconduct is automatic for instigating if you wear a visor I believe.
The problem is the instigator. Burns jumped him!
|
Well that explains it then. I didn't even think of that.
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:22 PM
|
#149
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
The game misconduct is automatic for instigating if you wear a visor I believe.
The problem is the instigator. Burns jumped him!
|
No, that's not true.
Many guys have fought with a visor on and not called for instigating and a game misconduct.
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:23 PM
|
#150
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
10 minute misconduct, not a game.
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:24 PM
|
#151
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Jones is getting a shutout.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:24 PM
|
#152
|
|
Franchise Player
|
The instigator is confusing enough. Not allowed to retaliate after getting high sticked then hit after a whistle
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:25 PM
|
#153
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Hathaway's game misconduct was changed on NHL.com to just "misconduct"
whatever that means
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:25 PM
|
#154
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
|
I generally don't go in for "the refs have it out for the Flames", but this is pretty ridiculous. They have obviously decided to turn the screws since the Wideman thing.
That was a five minute high stick for Burns, and a minor for roughing all before the fracas starts.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RougeUnderoos For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:25 PM
|
#155
|
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Hathaway got 10, not a game.
10 is automatic for instigating with a visor.
I remember Bourque got it at home vs Washington defending Langkow and we had a 7 minute PK I believe as well.
Iggy got it a couple times too. 2 + 5 + 10.
Last edited by AC; 03-07-2016 at 08:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:26 PM
|
#156
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Hathaway's game misconduct was changed on NHL.com to just "misconduct"
whatever that means
|
Maybe just a 10
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:26 PM
|
#157
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Sounds like Hathaway was having a hell of of a game.
__________________
"You're worried about the team not having enough heart. I'm worried about the team not having enough brains." HFOil fan, August 12th, 2020. E=NG
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to foshizzle11 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:26 PM
|
#158
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
I remember Boutique got it at home vs Washington defending Langkow and we had a 7 minute PK I believe as well.
|
just great
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:26 PM
|
#159
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
The game misconduct is automatic for instigating if you wear a visor I believe.
The problem is the instigator. Burns jumped him!
|
Don't know if that's still a thing. Think that odd rule was tossed out when they decided to grandfather in mandatory visors.
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2016, 08:27 PM
|
#160
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Hathaway got 10, not a game.
10 is automatic for instigating with a visor.
I remember Boutique got it at home vs Washington defending Langkow and we had a 7 minute PK I believe as well.
Iggy got it a couple times too. 2 + 5 + 10.
|
That's a weird rule if you consider he has no choice on wearing the visor
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.
|
|
