Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2016, 08:43 PM   #141
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

I wouldn't buy Stajan out, I would keep him for the purpose of exposing him in the expansion draft, unless his NTC is an obstacle. He would be a great veteran leader for any would-be expansion team.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 08:45 PM   #142
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

6F: Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Backlund, Jankowski, Poirier/Shinkaruk

4D: Giordano, Brodie, Hamilton, Jokipakka

1G: Gillies

Last edited by djsFlames; 03-15-2016 at 08:48 PM.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 08:46 PM   #143
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
I wouldn't buy Stajan out, I would keep him for the purpose of exposing him in the expansion draft, unless his NTC is an obstacle. He would be a great veteran leader for any would-be expansion team.
Well that's just it. His NTC could mean we need to put him on our protected list. If this is the case we need to buy him out.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2016, 09:18 PM   #144
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
6F: Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Backlund, Jankowski, Poirier/Shinkaruk

4D: Giordano, Brodie, Hamilton, Jokipakka

1G: Gillies
I doubt Jankowski will need protecting. If he does, there will be a lot of really good players available. If guys like that do need protecting, I will actually be kind of jealous of the new team as they will likely be just as good as we are right off the bat. Not as many top end players, but their bottom 9 forwards and bottom 4 defense will probably be much better if they can pick first years pros. Teams will be forced to leave really good players available so their top prospects don't get poached.

I eagerly await the NHL screwing this up. It should be fun watching an expansion team zoom past us after we had to endure years of pain.

Last edited by Fire of the Phoenix; 03-15-2016 at 09:21 PM.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 09:20 PM   #145
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
Well that's just it. His NTC could mean we need to put him on our protected list. If this is the case we need to buy him out.
I bet a few will waive rather than risk getting bought out. A guy like Stajan knows he might not get another contract, playing for an expansion team might be his best bet. It will be an interesting dynamic to watch as it plays out.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2016, 09:30 PM   #146
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
After this NEXT season, the only NTC/NMC the Flames have as of now are:

1. Frolik
2. Stajan
3. Gio
4. Brodie

That's it unless they hand any out vis UFA this summer.

Also, my bet is they would buy out Stajan long before being forced to keep him on a protected list over a better, younger player.
I would think that the expansion rules will be set before this summer (assuming the league is going to expand) and if that's the case there will be very few NMCs handed out (again, assuming you won't be able to make those types of players available in the expansion draft).
Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 12:11 AM   #147
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Obviously the top players and prospects aren't going to be available. If top players had to be available, the expansion teams would have a really good opportunity to come in and be the very best in the league.

Really, there's no fair way to prevent expansion teams in their first year to be filled up with bottom six forwards, and maybe a couple decent, but overpaid players - teams that try hard but can't really compete. I wouldn't expect the awfulness of some of the last round of expansion, but I wouldn't expect anywhere near a winning record.

Also, I wouldn't worry about losing too much. For every team that enters the league, you either lose a bottom six forward, or a bottom three d man, on average. For the most part, the replacement level player you fill up that spot with is nearly as good.

Losing a colborne and an Engllend (as an example) over a summer or two wouldn't hurt too much.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 12:23 AM   #148
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I think one thing people seem to be forgetting is they will also limit the number of players a team can lose, I imagine that they will limit it to 2 or 3 players per team with the addition of 2 teams.

But as someone else mentioned it would be better to have the expansion teams in the entry draft a year or two early to build a bit of a prospect base rather than forcing teams to lose their prospects they have developed.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 12:35 AM   #149
Trojan97
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
This is all so annoying to me.

Flames go into a much needed rebuild, start acquiring all sorts of nice young assets and all of a sudden it's looking like they're going to open up player exposure in an expansion draft. Not to mention that they change the draft lottery rules too so that the worst teams have less odds at picking high.

Bunch of ****ing baloney IMO.
Way she goes. No different then a team who finally gives up and decides to rebuild and ends up with a couple weak drafts at the top end instead of the McDavid/Crosby. Sure it sucks that expansion is likely to coincide with us having good young talent and possibly losing a piece or two but stuff happens. Besides, A) no one has any idea how the expansion process will work beyond speculation, and B) while we certainly have a few nice pieces, we're far from having a goldmine of talent coming up.
Trojan97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 08:39 AM   #150
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

nm

Last edited by sureLoss; 03-16-2016 at 08:49 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy