View Poll Results: What do you think of the Bouma contact?
|
Good term and AAV.
|
  
|
280 |
55.67% |
Good term. AAV is low.
|
  
|
6 |
1.19% |
Good term. AAV is high.
|
  
|
179 |
35.59% |
AAV is good. Term is too long.
|
  
|
12 |
2.39% |
AAV is good. Term is too short.
|
  
|
8 |
1.59% |
Both term and AAV is bad.
|
  
|
18 |
3.58% |
07-23-2015, 04:08 PM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
Pinder right. Boomer wrong.
|
Haha yup, I'm surprised that took until page 5 to be brought up
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:09 PM
|
#142
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerio
200k in your opinion. In mine it's closer to 500k. I'll bet he doesn't score 10 goals or hit 30 points again over the life of this contract. Overpaying is overpaying, and it does make a difference
|
Not sure about your projection, but even if true, he might still be properly paid. Consider these similar forwards which will be UFA in the next few years:
Eric Nystrom $2.5
Brandon Prust $2.5
Blake Comeau $2.4
Nick Spaling $2.2
Matt Calvert $2.2
I don't think any of the above are particularly bad, and I think I would take Bouma and his deal over all of them.
Edit: And if you think he should be at $1.7, then you have almost entirely ELC types, plus Jared Boll or Chris Stewart as comparisons.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Last edited by Fighting Banana Slug; 07-23-2015 at 04:13 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:12 PM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
|
What were Pinder and Boomer saying?
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:13 PM
|
#144
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
|
Ha ha - Bouma says he is finding Vancouver is full of Flames fans!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Gaudfather For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:16 PM
|
#145
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Whatever we think of the terms, this would be more fun if there was a "Let's Make a Deal" moment where once the matter is settled, a giant curtain goes up and, "Show em' what they could have had at arbitration, Monty!"
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ThisIsAnOutrage For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:17 PM
|
#146
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Who knows. Saad was traded because of Bickell.
Flames aren't that tight to that cap yet, but you have to be careful about giving money to bottom 6 players.
|
I would not mind having first world problems like the Chicago Blackhawks. You need quality players on all 4 lines to win a Stanley Cup.
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:19 PM
|
#147
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
He's been the replacement for Glencross so I don't see this contract as being out of line. Unless someone beats him out such as Ferland, he'll probably be the second line LW centred by Backlund. If he isn't, he can still play down the lineup and be a good contributor.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:29 PM
|
#148
|
Disenfranchised
|
I was sure that Cheerio was the guy hoping to sign Schlemko to a huge contract and am glad to see I was remembering correctly. Good stuff there.
Congratulations to Lance, glad to see him continuing with the Flames. Love what he brings to the team.
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:38 PM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
|
I was a little hesitant with the $2.2 AAV, but Brandon Prust makes $2.5 and has been full value for it for Montreal. Bouma is better than Prust in every way. 3 @ $2.2 is great for both sides.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to tvp2003 For This Useful Post:
|
bax,
Cali Panthers Fan,
christoph186,
FlameZilla,
Francis's Hairpiece,
HelloHockeyFans,
Inferno099,
kkaleR,
Saint Troy,
Savvy27,
the2bears
|
07-23-2015, 04:40 PM
|
#151
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
Does anyone have the link to the interview?
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:41 PM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
The Avs are paying Blake Comeau $2.4 million for the next three seasons. I know who I'd rather have.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
BlackWallStreet,
corporatejay,
DropIt,
Francis's Hairpiece,
fuffalo,
gonzo29,
mikeecho,
MissTeeks,
The Fonz,
the2bears,
Yoho
|
07-23-2015, 04:42 PM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern
Does anyone have the link to the interview?
|
http://www.sportsnet.ca/960/the-big-...me-to-improve/
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:53 PM
|
#154
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I was originally hoping for 2yrs @ 2mil/yr... Until I read the UFA part, good deal with that factored in.
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 04:55 PM
|
#155
|
First Line Centre
|
If he replicates his goal numbers from last season even once during this contract then this is a steal.
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 05:02 PM
|
#156
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Holland
|
Personally I find it more likely that he scores 30+ points again than him not doing it. - at least once during this contract.
Yeah he's a 3/4 line player and he's very physical, but I think there is some slight silliness that goes through some people's mind that equates his style of play to a lack of offensive ability. Bouma is actually a pretty good offensive player. Saying he won't get over 30 points over the next 3 years actually boggles my mind. His defence I guess can overshadow his offensive capability but from watching last season, he's got great hands, a good shot and great hockey iq. He will also next season or the one after be playing with better players because our depth will be that much better.
I'll predict that next season he gets 34 points.
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 05:09 PM
|
#157
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I will take that bet. Name the terms.
|
Careful. According to some posters saying "I bet" doesn't mean they actually bet, and they might ridicule your use of the English language and insult you for attempting to accept such an offer.
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 05:25 PM
|
#158
|
#1 Goaltender
|
A lack of a response shows how confident he was in the statement anyways.
|
|
|
07-23-2015, 06:04 PM
|
#159
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the RR diner
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
IMO that is not correct...
Stajan
Smid
Engellend
Raymond
... those are all flat out bad contracts relative to what they provide. There are a few others that I would call slightly bad but not flat out bad.
|
For me, to be a bad contract the player has to be overpaid significantly compared to what they bring, or be signed to a number of years that extend far beyond what most people would think would be a realistic playing career for that player.
Engelland is probably overpaid by 400k. He was signed as a number 5 defenseman. Look around the league and that really isn't out of whack with the cap hit of a 5 defenseman, especially one who managed to play in the top 4 last year and did a decent job. He is only signed 2 more years. That is hardly a bad contract. He isn't a value contract, but he really isn't significantly overpaid in any rational scenario.
Smid is likely done, from everything that I have read, so you can't say it is a good or bad contract because he can't play. If he doesn't come back this year he will probably be on IR for the remainder of his career. The cap number is high so it does have a small affect on the team's cap during the off season. However, it is still under 4 million and since the team can go over the cap by 10% in the off season, it really won't affect the ability of the team to do business. So it is an unfortunate situation because he can't play, but it is hardly a cap drag.
Stajan will probably be pushed out of the lineup within the next couple of years, but he isn't massively overpaid. You could argue this is a bad contract because he has three more years on it. He still has value to the team, and I personally don't think him much overpaid if at all, but this is the one you could argue is a bad contract.
So I'll give you Stajan. But otherwise Raymond is really the only obviously bad contract on the Flames roster. There are a few players —Engelland, Bouma, Frolik, Widema, Jones— that are not value contracts. These players are being paid market value, which means that they need to perform to their abilities to justify their cap numbers. That doesn't make them bad contracts, they just aren't team friendly. For the Flames, these contracts are more than mitigated by Brodie, Russell, Hudler, and the ECL contracts that the Flames have on their roster that generally balance out the cap.
It seems to me that some fans want every contract on the roster to be a value contract. This is great in a perfect world, but different situations make it impossible for any team to always get the best value. Whether it be signing players in free agency, trading for players that come with the contract they come with, or even through the negotiation process, the team isn't always going to win on value. Sometimes the player will win. But just because a contract isn't a value contract doesn't make it a bad contract. A bad contract is when a player cannot perform relative to the cap number and/or term of the contract. From that perspective, I really think Raymond and maybe Stajan stand out on the Flames, and both players are making less than 4 million dollars. The Flames have a good cap situation. What will determine their ability to keep their players are the contracts they give to Gio, Monahan, and Gaudreau. If they can get good value on those deals, they will be fine. If not, the band will not be together long. Bouma, Stajan, Engelland and the like are not going to make or break the Flames' cap, because you have to pay players to take their spot, and the difference between their number and the replacement number is not that significant. Not every position can be filled by and entry level contract.
__________________
Harry, I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. Every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don't plan it, don't wait for it, just... let it happen. Could be a new shirt at the men's store, a catnap in your office chair, or... two cups of good, hot, black coffee.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wingmaker For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-23-2015, 06:13 PM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
|
Good article from Darren Haynes about why Bouma is worth the contract : http://flamesfrom80feet.blogspot.ca/...t-to-team.html
Some highlights:
Quote:
Blocked Shots - Past Two Seasons:
1. Ryan Getzlaf ANA, 182
2. Lance Bouma CGY, 169
3. Boyd Gordon EDM, 168
4. Drew Miller DET, 162
5. Nick Bonino VCR, 158
|
Quote:
Blocked Shots Per Two Minutes of PK time - Past Two Seasons:
1. Lance Bouma CGY, 0.37
2. Logan Couture SJ, 0.31
3. Michal Handzus CHI, 0.30
4. Michael Raffl PHI, 0.30
5. Tommy Wingels SJ, 0.28
|
Quote:
Hits per Minute of Ice Time (minimum 1,000 minutes, 13+ mins per game) - Past Two Seasons:
1. Cal Clutterbuck NYI, 0.299
2. Adam Lowry WPG, 0.235
3. Blake Comeau CBJ/PIT, 0.229
4. Lance Bouma CGY, 0.211
5. Matt Hendricks NSH/EDM, 0.206
|
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 AM.
|
|