12-14-2014, 03:09 PM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay
Yup, I think we are collateral damage.
|
Isn't one of the likely victims the highly leveraged high cost shale oil producers in the US??
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dan02 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-14-2014, 04:24 PM
|
#142
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
|
A few more details of the comments:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-1...ops-to-40.html
“We are not going to change our minds because the prices went to $60 or to $40,” Mazrouei told Bloomberg yesterday at a conference in Dubai. “We’re not targeting a price; the market will stabilize itself.” He said current conditions don’t justify an extraordinary OPEC meeting. “We need to wait for at least a quarter” to consider an urgent session, he said.
“We will not have a real picture about oil prices until the end of the first half of 2015,” El-Badri said. Price will have settled by the second half of next year, and OPEC will have a clear idea by then about “the required measures,” he said.
OPEC kept its target unchanged last month because the group was uncertain whether a cut ranging from 1 million to 1.5 million barrels a day would have boosted prices, El-Badri said. The group wasn’t seeking to put pressure on the U.S. or Russia by maintaining output, he said.
“Our expectation in OPEC is that after 2020, the oil industry in the U.S. will decline” due to the nation’s low reserves, he said. The U.S. won’t become self-sufficient in oil and will continue to depend on Middle Eastern supply, El-Badri said.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to chemgear For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-14-2014, 06:44 PM
|
#143
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...-minister.html
Opec's most influential producers are willing to allow oil prices to fall to $40 per barrel before discussing whether the cartel should hold an emergency meeting to discuss cutting output.
Looks like all OPEC want from US is to cut down the production.
|
|
|
12-14-2014, 07:16 PM
|
#144
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Someone needs to change the title of this thread to "Oil price and Canadian dollar watch"
|
|
|
12-14-2014, 08:58 PM
|
#145
|
Had an idea!
|
Obviously OPEC wants the US to cut production.
That is the only reason all of this is happening.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-14-2014, 09:29 PM
|
#146
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
That is the only reason all of this is happening.
|
It's more a supply versus demand issue. Oil prices have been dropping substantially and consistently for many months now as worldwide production continues to grow more than there is demand.
Near term, the "official OPEC" party line and comments has only just sped up what has already been happening for more than half a year now.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to chemgear For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2014, 10:57 AM
|
#147
|
Had an idea!
|
And the sudden panic is resulting in a faster decline in the oil price.
The market will correct itself eventually, but if US producers are leveraged way too high they will suffer first. OPEC is rather hilarious though. Quite clear that they don't want any other significant oil production happening anywhere in the world.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 11:06 AM
|
#148
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemgear
“Our expectation in OPEC is that after 2020, the oil industry in the U.S. will decline” due to the nation’s low reserves, he said. The U.S. won’t become self-sufficient in oil and will continue to depend on Middle Eastern supply, El-Badri said.
|
So what happens if OPEC's expectation is wrong?
How do the members of OPEC plan on supporting their citizens when their oil supply is no longer needed?
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 11:13 AM
|
#149
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemgear
A few more details of the comments:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-1...ops-to-40.html
“We are not going to change our minds because the prices went to $60 or to $40,” Mazrouei told Bloomberg yesterday at a conference in Dubai. “We’re not targeting a price; the market will stabilize itself.” He said current conditions don’t justify an extraordinary OPEC meeting. “We need to wait for at least a quarter” to consider an urgent session, he said.
“We will not have a real picture about oil prices until the end of the first half of 2015,” El-Badri said. Price will have settled by the second half of next year, and OPEC will have a clear idea by then about “the required measures,” he said.
OPEC kept its target unchanged last month because the group was uncertain whether a cut ranging from 1 million to 1.5 million barrels a day would have boosted prices, El-Badri said. The group wasn’t seeking to put pressure on the U.S. or Russia by maintaining output, he said.
“Our expectation in OPEC is that after 2020, the oil industry in the U.S. will decline” due to the nation’s low reserves, he said. The U.S. won’t become self-sufficient in oil and will continue to depend on Middle Eastern supply, El-Badri said.
|
If I'm the USA I continue building the infrastructure for oil production regardless of profitability. The USA invests a huge amount of money into the middle east and the fallout from from spikes in oil prices. That money would be better spent giving workers jobs to produce infrastructure. Much like the did building highways a few decades ago.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 11:33 AM
|
#150
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
If I'm the USA I continue building the infrastructure for oil production regardless of profitability. The USA invests a huge amount of money into the middle east and the fallout from from spikes in oil prices. That money would be better spent giving workers jobs to produce infrastructure. Much like the did building highways a few decades ago.
|
That basically involves a bailout of oil companies so that they can keep operating in unprofitable conditions. I'll give you one guess as to how the American (and Canadian) people would react to such a policy.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 11:42 AM
|
#151
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regorium
That basically involves a bailout of oil companies so that they can keep operating in unprofitable conditions. I'll give you one guess as to how the American (and Canadian) people would react to such a policy.
|
I'd disagree on that characterization as you'd be putting the money into potentially publicly owned infrastructure.
If you do want to characterize it as a bailout, it's a much better option than being at the mercy of the Saudi royals or having to pay for much larger bailouts later on.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 11:45 AM
|
#152
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Obviously OPEC wants the US to cut production.
That is the only reason all of this is happening.
|
Opec are putting pressure on Iran and Russia, that's the reason this is happening.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2014, 12:05 PM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Opec are putting pressure on Iran and Russia, that's the reason this is happening.
|
It's more Saudi putting pressure on everyone that isn't Saudia Arabia. They want to kill US unconventional oil producers who have high production costs while at the same time punish Russia for it's foreign policy. Venezuela and Russia though both have regimes that rely heavily on the support of ignorant masses which are heavily influenced by oil subsidies. We'll probably see a destabilization of these two if the prices remain low for more than half a year.
Russians are already being screwed by sanctions that have seen food prices rise more than 25% since the June. Once the oil prices drop, I wonder how long it'll take before regular Russian's have issues that Putin cannot explain away.
Last edited by FlameOn; 12-15-2014 at 12:26 PM.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 12:11 PM
|
#154
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan
|
Bloomberg with an update on their original article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-1...ng-energy.html
Speculators added to wagers that the slump in oil futures, the worst since the global recession, is ending. Prices kept falling anyway.
Money managers raised their net-long position in U.S. crude to the highest in two months in the week ended Dec. 9, U.S. government data show. Most of the change came from short holdings contracting to the lowest level since August.
Investors added $264.5 million into the four funds so far this month, following a $559.85 million inflow in November that was the most since June 2012.
“This shows that there’s a lot of skepticism about the selloff and a feeling that prices should soon rebound,” John Kilduff, a partner at Again Capital LLC, a New York-based hedge fund that focuses on energy, said by phone Dec. 12. “We’re seeing bargain hunting by investors of all stripes.”
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 12:55 PM
|
#155
|
Franchise Player
|
Is there really a bad play right now for major oil producers? I'm looking at the board and having a hard time deciding where to put my money. Not to mention when to invest it.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 01:37 PM
|
#156
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
Is there really a bad play right now for major oil producers? I'm looking at the board and having a hard time deciding where to put my money. Not to mention when to invest it.
|
I'd wait for the bounce up before doing anyting.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 01:53 PM
|
#157
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
It's more Saudi putting pressure on everyone that isn't Saudia Arabia. They want to kill US unconventional oil producers who have high production costs while at the same time punish Russia for it's foreign policy. Venezuela and Russia though both have regimes that rely heavily on the support of ignorant masses which are heavily influenced by oil subsidies. We'll probably see a destabilization of these two if the prices remain low for more than half a year.
Russians are already being screwed by sanctions that have seen food prices rise more than 25% since the June. Once the oil prices drop, I wonder how long it'll take before regular Russian's have issues that Putin cannot explain away.
|
I'd definitely agree and say at least part of this is to put a halt to US shale development. The US is on the verge of energy independence from the middle east. The Saudis want to keep their biggest customer on the hook.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 02:07 PM
|
#158
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
I'd definitely agree and say at least part of this is to put a halt to US shale development. The US is on the verge of energy independence from the middle east. The Saudis want to keep their biggest customer on the hook.
|
Why are people still clinging to the fact that the USA will be energy independent? It's been said over and over that the shale drillers are under water and can't keep up with their debt payments, with oil tanking it's a matter of time before they are officially bankrupt and then you'll see fire-sale prices of their land holdings (I heard somewhere around 2017-2020). The shale boom was never sustainable, just another bubble fueled by cheap credit similar to the real estate bust and dot-com bubble. From bubble to bubble we go.....
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-1...t-markets.html
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 02:39 PM
|
#159
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
Is there really a bad play right now for major oil producers? I'm looking at the board and having a hard time deciding where to put my money. Not to mention when to invest it.
|
I'm in the same situation as you, lots of cash with my eye on suncor. But with oil dropping daily I'm gonna wait until it plateaus which likely won't be until the new year.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 02:48 PM
|
#160
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizkitgto
Why are people still clinging to the fact that the USA will be energy independent? It's been said over and over that the shale drillers are under water and can't keep up with their debt payments, with oil tanking it's a matter of time before they are officially bankrupt and then you'll see fire-sale prices of their land holdings (I heard somewhere around 2017-2020). The shale boom was never sustainable, just another bubble fueled by cheap credit similar to the real estate bust and dot-com bubble. From bubble to bubble we go.....
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-1...t-markets.html
|
The only reason they are underwater is due to the low oil prices.... Which is exactly my point. If oil prices were at their natural levels the shale fields would be profitable.
Instead OPEC is using the same simple and dirty trick all monopolists use. Sell at artificially low prices, drive the smaller and developing competition out of business, and then jack up the price.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 PM.
|
|