Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
.
|
I'm not comparing Backlund as a hockey player to Crosby. I'm comparing their injury history, and your logic that if someone is injured for a significant amount of time then the team should look into trading that player.
Examples of high quality young players that were injured early in their careers? David Perron, Niklas Backstrom (WSH), Spezza, Gaborik. I can cherry pick plenty players who have been injured often during their career. But that's not the point, because they aren't Backlund. Just like Sami Salo isn't Backlund, just like Crosby or Lemiuex aren't Backlund - but I like the sarcasm in your post, it really helps get the point across that you've completely missed what I've been saying in my last several posts.
The point I am trying to make, is that we still do not know what we have in Backlund. To give up and trade him is a mistake - especially given the encouraging signs he's shown this year. Do you actually think that trading Backlund at this point would get you anything? The team is better served to develop him and have patience.
The knives truly are out on the board right now.
You know what? The Flames aren't a good team, but it sure isn't Backlund's fault that we are fighting for a lottery pick, he's been one of the few bright spots this season. Its getting to the point that you can't have a rational conversation anymore.