02-24-2022, 06:45 AM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
What “justification” is Putin using for this invasion?
|
Putin had "rebel" forces shell schools in Donbas and blamed evacuations and the humanitarian crisis on the Ukrainians and then launched the attacks saying he needed to "de-nazify" Ukraine. They also claimed to have found mass graves of "Russian" civilians in Ukraine "separatist" regions. Problem was the world was watching and all the justification videos used had metadata that showed they were filmed days prior to the supposed incidents.
Every Russian claim to justify this has been thoroughly debunked cuz UK/US/EU countries have been actively release all intel publicly to counter Russian misinformation after dealing with the last time in 2014. Its a naked war of aggression on Putin's part at this point.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FlameOn For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 06:47 AM
|
#142
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
Germany's response in all this has been insulting. Best they offered Ukraine was some helmets and nothing else. Germany needs to ween itself off Russian natural gas and fast. Should have been clear to do that years ago tho in 2014.
|
I read that Germany didn't want to send weapons because when Ukraine inevitably fell those arms and supplied would fall into Russian hands.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Zoller For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 06:52 AM
|
#143
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haifa, Israel
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
What “justification” is Putin using for this invasion?
|
"To stop genocide by Ukrainians on citizens of rebel republics".
|
|
|
02-24-2022, 06:54 AM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoller
I read that Germany didn't want to send weapons because when Ukraine inevitably fell those arms and supplied would fall into Russian hands.
|
That's BS, they were cowards who didn't want to stoke tensions early on and now still are maintaining a "neutral" position. You don't need to send any of the advance stuff that Russia could reverse engineer if you are worried about that. Just send stacks of HK rifles, small arms, anti-air infantry weapons, that Russia would have had plenty of access to on the open market, just to seem fair with other NATO allies aid to Ukraine. Like the Dutch sent radar systems, anti-tank weapons, mine detection equipment, rifles, helmets, and combat vests and the Dutch don't make any of this stuff themselves and are much smaller than Germany.
Germany is one of the west's biggest arms exporters, they have plenty of that stuff laying around and Ukrainians have huge numbers of reservists to arm if the war is to become protracted in any way. Ukraine has a huge reservist force that they could mobilize, activate, and arm for a longer fight/insurgency if it came down to it. Small arms falling into Russian hands wouldn't matter at all since its not like Russia has a shortage of that stuff at all from their own factories + the USSR. Russia has thousands of tanks rusting unused for crying out loud. Not sending anything means Germany is just writing Ukraine off and it's an embarrassing position for Germany to take.
Last edited by FlameOn; 02-24-2022 at 07:14 AM.
|
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:00 AM
|
#146
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
What “justification” is Putin using for this invasion?
|
Distractions from dominating the daily COVID death count globally.
|
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:01 AM
|
#147
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
This thing is going to be over in the next few days with the rate that the Russian attack is going.
Really Nato and the UN should have mobilized on this weeks ago and at least NATO should have re-enforced with heavy units. Instead the Ukraine Military is getting swamped under.
1) Frankly by the time the consultations and debate with the UN, which won't matter with China holding a hammer with a Veto vote, so any military action by the UN won't happen. And even if it does, it will be far too late. NATO can try to respond, but that will take days that Ukraine doesn't have.
By the time any action happens, Russia will have complete control of the air, any deep water ports that Nato needs will be under Russian control. They will dig in their troops and re-enforce over a short logistics line. Also pretty much any airfield will also be under Russian control. That literally leaves out any deployment of heavy units except by road. The US and Great Britain would have to send units through Poland or Germany through Austria and Hungry via road, and by the time they arrived they would have to fight through air power and long range artillary. Also what's problimatic is that the sea borne re-enforcements would go through Poland through a port like Gdansk, but with Russian Aircraft in Belarus, they would be able to interdict any shipment of heavy weapons, and formations that are needed in Ukraine.
Ukraine maybe has 150 functional modern battle tanks like the T-84 with another few hundred older T-80's 72's and 64. The Russian's have a huge advantage in heavy formation numbers.
I guess NATO could deploy their rapid response force. But a rapid response force is really light infantry troops and their transport aircraft and by the time that could be deployed which by the NATO handbook is a day there won't be any airfields.
Any battle now wouldn't be a battle to defend Ukraine, but to Liberate it fighting a entrenched enemy with air and artillery superiority.
2) We can talk about a nuclear option or warning. Someone mentioned detonating a small device to warn the Russians to back off or they'll get more. But frankly I would expect that any detonation of a nuclear device on Russian Soil would instantly trigger a nuclear response by Russia at the country that fires it. The last thing we need is an escalation to a nuclear nightmare. The Russians and Americans and Brits have massive amounts of nuclear warheads. Even firing a "Warning shot" would be utter madness, especially with Putin on the other side.
3) We can talk about what Canada should do, but frankly outside of sanctions I don't even see how we'd be any use in a modern battlefield. Our armed forces are too far gone, to old and obsolete. Yes our Soldiers are top of the line. But this isn't the taliban or ISIS we're fighting. This is a major military power, with advanced weapons and aircraft wed be facing. A Canadian contribution wouldn't last long or be all that useful. I mean the first and most likely contribution would likely be a squadron of CF-18's. Some transport and surveillance craft. Navy wise I think we were looking at deploying a frigate. But we don't have the transportation ability to send tanks or AFV and NATO's going to give priority to other nations who have more advanced and modern military gear. So Canada is just going to have to look at economic levers and Putin doesn't give a crap about that.
4) The international response is going to be too late, too slow and too indecisive. The only thing that Ukraine is probably going to be able to do in the next 72 hours or so is take their military out of the field, save what they have militarily and form a insurgency movement. The problem is that the Russian's historically aren't known to be all the concerned with things like civilian casualties or honoring things like the Geneva Convention, so its likely that any action by an insurgent group will lead to Russian retaliation against civilian centers.
5) If we don't think that China wasn't informed by Putin about this, or that they aren't watching this with a ton of interest, we're fooling ourselves. The problem for China is that while they have upgraded their navy, and added power projection in their own sea with carriers and long range ground based aviation and missiles. They don't really want a confrontation with the US Navy. However if China is interested in resources, they won't even bother with Taiwan, they'll go straight after the Spratley's, and be happy with that.
Frankly as soon as Putin saw NATO with a bit of a split (Thanks Germany). No significant re-enforcements of the Ukraine Military, and the imposition of sanctions instead of a combined sanction and re-enforcement effort with heavy formations, advanced aircraft and artillery, he was going to jump at this.
just my two cents.
|
I was suggesting it would be Putin that might use this nuclear solution. Escalate to de escalate.
If he's facing a bigger response than anticipated or backed into a corner he just might use a small >3 KT tactical bomb somewhere and scare the hell out of the world. Then what? Is a western nuclear power going to act in kind? I doubt it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to karl262 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:04 AM
|
#148
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haifa, Israel
|
Budapest memorandum should have been written way more clear
|
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:05 AM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Some war protests have begun in Russia - not huge but something:
https://twitter.com/user/status/1496845964103061512
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:06 AM
|
#150
|
Franchise Player
|
What’s with all the ALL CAPS news tweets? Is that a new thing?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:28 AM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
This still feels like a giant self own by Russia. They will win the battles with Ukraine but there will be a big cost to them and I just don't see a huge benefit to them besides land.. but they've got boatloads of that as it is.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:32 AM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
This still feels like a giant self own by Russia. They will win the battles with Ukraine but there will be a big cost to them and I just don't see a huge benefit to them besides land.. but they've got boatloads of that as it is.
|
Its not about land for Putin. This is ego and protecting his domestic position. The rest of the world has been letting him get away with stuff for too long, the cost for this has to be extremely high now.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameOn For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:33 AM
|
#154
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haifa, Israel
|
Russia stands to gain absolutely nothing from this war. Putin stands to gain absolutely nothing either. What could be his reasons:
1. He's gone insane. Possible, but this has been planned for months by many high level people. Somehow nobody within his inner circle stopped him, even though they don't seem to gain much either
2. Putin wants to show off NATO. That was the leading theory before the actual invasion. But with actual war there's no doubt that everyone will beg to join NATO. NATO will now authorize much bigger spendings and will likely put all sorts of missiles targeting Russia so to keep us at the gunpoint.
3. Putin wants to restore USSR. That's silly, unless he's literally mad. Russia stands to gain nothing by gaining more land. Invading Ukraine will not make his legacy any "great", but the opposite. Everyone in Russia is shocked at this. This is the end of him as a public politician.
4. Putin got some real intel about USA trying to assassinate or at least topple him or something like that. So he's showing his strength and freaking out. Remember he's been limiting US embassy in Russia for years.
5. Putin actually has Russia's best interest in mind and wants more buffer, secure access to the black sea and such. Also mad by NATO breaking promise about not expanding east. It's somewhat plausible, but such actions will result in the opposite of his goals. It's more like a hissy fit, than a calculated plan.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Pointman For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:37 AM
|
#155
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haifa, Israel
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
Its not about land for Putin. This is ego and protecting his domestic position. The rest of the world has been letting him get away with stuff for too long, the cost for this has to be extremely high now.
|
This war absolutely destroys his domestic position. Russians are absolutely shocked at this. Russians basically gave up their rights to vote and such in return for stability and fairly rich life. Like it's ok to not be able to chose a president as long, as you can spend honeymoon on Maldives. After this, we will most definitely try to get the ability to choose leadership back
Last edited by Pointman; 02-24-2022 at 08:17 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Pointman For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:45 AM
|
#156
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IGGYRULES
First Ukraine... Then what.. where does.it end with this psychopath
Sent from my SM-S908W using Tapatalk
|
Only when the USSR is back and in tact.
__________________
|
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:50 AM
|
#157
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube
What’s with all the ALL CAPS news tweets? Is that a new thing?
|
They're copied and pasted directly from the BloombergTerminal as they come in to Twitter.
|
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:50 AM
|
#158
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointman
This war absolutely destroys his domestic position. Russians are absolutely shocked at this. Russians basically gave up their rights to vote and such in return for stability and fairly rich life. Like it's ok to not be able to chose a president as long, as you can spend honeymoon on Maldives (like I did). After this, we will most definitely try to get the ability to choose leadership back
|
Unless Putin was in a weaker position domestically than he was letting on at home and now is going to use to the war as an excuse to round up and purge remaining dissenting opposition elements.
Revolutions usually coalesce around existing politic leaders and elements. I'd expect any Navalny sympathizers to get rounded up and arrested shortly. After that, who do anti-Putin Russians rally around? Then maybe further Russian constitutional and government restructuring.
|
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:56 AM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony-soprano
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony-soprano
They're copied and pasted directly from the BloombergTerminal as they come in to Twitter.
|
Why not take them off Bloomberg proper instead of some rando unaccredited entrepreneur account then?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameOn For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2022, 07:59 AM
|
#160
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
We knew this was happening when the hockey team wore CCCP throwbacks.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 PM.
|
|