Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2022, 09:16 AM   #1521
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
If the team is contending for a playoff position, they won’t trade him at the trade deadline.
Fair enough - that's just luck of having a horrible GM then.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:17 AM   #1522
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
I wonder how the discussions go to get this done.

Obviously Treliving's talking with other GMs to sort out a deal...

Tkachuk (his agent) is talking with other GMs to sort out a potential contract...

At some point either Treliving has to go to Tkachuk and say "we have a deal ready to send you to X if you'll sign there", or Tkachuk's agent approaches Treliving with "Matt will sign in X if you trade him there".

Problem is to maximize the trade return for the Flames, "X" probably should be at least 2 or 3 teams.

It's fine to say Tkachuk has a list of teams he'd be willing to be traded to, but those teams also have to be willing to sign him, and Tkachuk has to like the contract to sign it.

Maybe Tkachuk says he wants to make $___/yr, and Treliving has to negotiate that contract as part of the trade discussions (the very rare sign & trade)? Not sure if that makes it easier or more difficult...
Interesting. Yeah maybe teams get Tkachuks “starting ask”, and make an assessment?
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:18 AM   #1523
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Why? I understand he may not be the main piece Flames fans want for Tkachuk, however, why would he be a disaster?

Tarasenko has 1 more year left at $7.5 MM. He is 30 years old and coming off a 82 point campaign when he scored 34 goals. He also scored 6 goals in 12 playoff games.

Tarasenko has been a consistent 30 goal scorer in the league. Even if he doesn't want to stay in Calgary, he is someone who can easily get a 1st round pick at the deadline.

Take on Tarasenko as a cap dump? Sure no problem, but he can’t be part of the “value” in the trade for the Flames. If anything they should be compensated for taking on his cap and helping the Blues.

Tarasenko has known injury issues. What if he gets hurt before the trade deadline and you can’t move him? Calgary can’t take that risk when trading their most valuable asset IMO.

The Flames aren’t winning anything of consequence next season do Tarasenko’s on ice value is pretty minimal to the team.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:18 AM   #1524
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I’m really hoping for an NJD deal.

Bratt + Holtz + 1st would be something that I consider to be an absolute home run return now that I’ve looked at Bratt a bit more. Seems like that may just be a “dream” return though…but hey, hope!
I still think this one is the best too. It’s even better if Bratt signs an 7 year extension. THW top 100 prospects has Holtz 7th. He would be hands down our top prospect and he’s NHL ready.

Bratt and Holtz in Gaudreau and Tkachuk out but we save $10+ mil on the cap and the potential is there for both to be first line caliber players

2 firsts next draft and our first likely a top 10. Could be set after 1 trade
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:20 AM   #1525
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

With so few teams in the mix that Tkatchuk would like and the pressure on us, I just don't see Calgary getting a good offer from them by the time arbitration comes around. As an aside, that arbitration will be nasty if it gets there.

The team is in a spiral anyway. Treliving might as well hold firm (like Sakic and Duchene). If Treliving holds out for a good offer, Tkachuk could be here at training camp and maybe more.

Or maybe reasonable value is still available from teams with which he won't extend. Flip him to the Sharks even. You never know who Grier might let go of as he seems determined to remake the team how he wants.

This could go so many more ways and last longer than I originally thought.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:21 AM   #1526
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Fair enough - that's just luck of having a horrible GM then.
A horrible GM that runs a team that lost it's two best players but is still contending for a playoff spot?

Head scratcher
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2022, 09:23 AM   #1527
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
Take on Tarasenko as a cap dump? Sure no problem, but he can’t be part of the “value” in the trade for the Flames. If anything they should be compensated for taking on his cap and helping the Blues.

Tarasenko has known injury issues. What if he gets hurt before the trade deadline and you can’t move him? Calgary can’t take that risk when trading their most valuable asset IMO.

The Flames aren’t winning anything of consequence next season do Tarasenko’s on ice value is pretty minimal to the team.
Outside of 2 seasons (1 being Covid), he has consistently played over 75 games in 6 our of the last 8 seasons (including this year). Not sure I agree with you.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:24 AM   #1528
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
A horrible GM that runs a team that lost it's two best players but is still contending for a playoff spot?

Head scratcher
Are you going to start comparing this post to playing checkers and chess too lol
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:24 AM   #1529
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default Tkachuk notifies Flames he won't sign long term (The Athletic)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
A horrible GM that runs a team that lost it's two best players but is still contending for a playoff spot?

Head scratcher

When you lose your two best players and are in the position the Flames are the goal shouldn’t be to squeak into playoffs. This teams needs a new direction- set by the manager.

A massive overhaul should be the plan and there is no better time to start than the 2023 draft.

I would much rather pick 4-5 times in the top 60 next year then watch the Flames lose in round 1.

Last edited by bax; 07-22-2022 at 09:33 AM.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:25 AM   #1530
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Outside of 2 seasons (1 being Covid), he has consistently played over 75 games in 6 our of the last 8 seasons (including this year). Not sure I agree with you.

He has had multiple shoulder surgeries. Regardless, anyone can get injured at anytime.

Like I said he’s fine as a cap dump, but can’t be viewed as adding value to a Tkachuk trade.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:26 AM   #1531
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
He has had multiple shoulder surgeries. Regardless, anyone can get injured at anytime.

Like I said he’s fine as a cap dump, but can’t be viewed as adding value to a Tkachuk trade.
That's fair. I still don't think it will be a disaster if the Flames get him in a trade though. Not as the main piece but I still think he has some value.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to keenan87 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2022, 09:31 AM   #1532
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
That's fair. I still don't think it will be a disaster if the Flames get him in a trade though. Not as the main piece but I still think he has some value.

I think we’re on the same page. I’m fine if he’s included in the trade, but to me his value would come exclusively from flipping him for more picks.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:34 AM   #1533
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Fair enough - that's just luck of having a horrible GM then.
It would be the same approach of any GM coming off of a season where they finished first in the division.

They will see how things go this season before fully committing to a rebuild. If things look bad close to the deadline with no sign of getting better then I would expect guys to start getting moved out.

It's wishful thinking for people to expect them to pack it in just because they lost 2/3 of their top line. Especially when we don't even know who they will get back for Tkachuk.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:36 AM   #1534
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

The bad part of all of this is if Tkachuk is determined to become a UFA as soon as possible.
He can submit a list to the Flames of teams that he will "negotiate" with now.
but
He can simply
- ask for 13M x 7 (or 13M x 8 if its a sign and trade) from all of them, killing any of
the Flames leverage.
- Take whatever the arbitrator rules.
- Leaving the Flames with the only option of dumping him for next to nothing
because everyone else knows he's going to free agency anyway.
I know this is a bit risky but he might see it as a worthwhile risk at this point.
All In Good Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:38 AM   #1535
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno View Post
It would be the same approach of any GM coming off of a season where they finished first in the division.

They will see how things go this season before fully committing to a rebuild. If things look bad close to the deadline with no sign of getting better then I would expect guys to start getting moved out.

It's wishful thinking for people to expect them to pack it in just because they lost 2/3 of their top line. Especially when we don't even know who they will get back for Tkachuk.
They might be telling existing players they aren't rebuilding for a reason. If the plan is to rip it apart I could see a bunch of players calling Treliving and asking to be traded.

The decision to full rebuild probably happens next summer when they can talk contract with Lindholm. He's the key to avoiding a full rebuild IMO

Hanifin can re-sign next summer too.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:38 AM   #1536
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time View Post
The bad part of all of this is if Tkachuk is determined to become a UFA as soon as possible.
He can submit a list to the Flames of teams that he will "negotiate" with now.
but
He can simply
- ask for 13M x 7 (or 13M x 8 if its a sign and trade) from all of them, killing any of
the Flames leverage.
- Take whatever the arbitrator rules.
- Leaving the Flames with the only option of dumping him for next to nothing
because everyone else knows he's going to free agency anyway.
I know this is a bit risky but he might see it as a worthwhile risk at this point.
Imagine your 2 best players not only leave but try to screw you the worst way possible….
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:39 AM   #1537
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

Flames want 3 Premium Assets for Tkachuk per Ryan Pike. "this pike guy is a Muppet."
__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:40 AM   #1538
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
A horrible GM that runs a team that lost it's two best players but is still contending for a playoff spot?

Head scratcher
I have mixed feelings on BT so this isn't complaining about him, but losing your 2 best players and going from division winner to competing for a playoff spot probably wouldn't be 2 points I'd argue to defend him.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2022, 09:40 AM   #1539
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
They might be telling existing players they aren't rebuilding for a reason. If the plan is to rip it apart I could see a bunch of players calling Treliving and asking to be traded.

The decision to full rebuild probably happens next summer when they can talk contract with Lindholm. He's the key to avoiding a full rebuild IMO

Hanifin can re-sign next summer too.
The Flames should not be waiting until after the best draft in a decade to make this decision.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 09:41 AM   #1540
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by All In Good Time View Post
The bad part of all of this is if Tkachuk is determined to become a UFA as soon as possible.
Tkachuk wanted to get to UFA as soon as possible so he could sign a long term deal in an American market of his choosing. He's basically there right now. He won't be screwing the Flames over (any more than he already has I suppose) at this point.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy