Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2023, 09:54 AM   #1461
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Posting twitter links in two threads will be too tiring for you?
He's just using his freedoms to tell other people what to do.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 04-28-2023, 09:58 AM   #1462
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
The last 3 NHL arenas that were built (T-Mobile, UBS and Climate Pledge) were each privately financed.

While they are bigger markets, I still think we're being fed a bunch of nonsense about how it's impossible for do this without taxpayer dollars.
Someone can definitely correct me if I am wrong but at least in the case of UBS it was privately financed but they did receive the land for the arena as a "gift" from the state. Essentially not a public investment or financing of the project but a significant value of public assets that goes unaccounted for.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calgarygeologist For This Useful Post:
Old 04-28-2023, 09:59 AM   #1463
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Any chance you could pull a hard left and redirect to the Alberta political thread and enlighten all them? Save this one for new arena conversation and excitement.
It's all part of the arena conversation. Go make a cheerleader thread if this upsets your sensibilities.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 09:59 AM   #1464
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
The last 3 NHL arenas that were built (T-Mobile, UBS and Climate Pledge) were each privately financed.

While they are bigger markets, I still think we're being fed a bunch of nonsense about how it's impossible for do this without taxpayer dollars.

Interesting side note that the Oak View group invested in both Climate Pledge (which they operate) and UBS.

They also have an Arena Alliance including many other NHL rinks (neither Alberta one) which helps among other things with facilitating booking of large arena tours
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 10:15 AM   #1465
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default



I do hope these guys are included on the bid list this go round as well.
Leeman4Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Leeman4Gilmour For This Useful Post:
Old 04-28-2023, 10:23 AM   #1466
Scary Eloranta
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Scary Eloranta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post


I do hope these guys are included on the bid list this go round as well.



That looks like it will be the next generation for arenas. Would be great to be the first team to do it (I think?) but I thought I read that it costs a lot more to build but who knows.
Scary Eloranta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 10:31 AM   #1467
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Larger foot print potentially does bring the inverted bowl back in play. IIRC the inverted bowl could not be put in the smaller footprint.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 04-28-2023, 10:33 AM   #1468
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scary Eloranta View Post
That looks like it will be the next generation for arenas. Would be great to be the first team to do it (I think?) but I thought I read that it costs a lot more to build but who knows.
LA Clippers are the first in Inglewood. I think it opens this year and its going to be stunning.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 10:58 AM   #1469
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
LA Clippers are the first in Inglewood. I think it opens this year and its going to be stunning.
It still has one more year. Based on the renderings, it looks like a standard upper/lower deck seating bowl...



__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 11:16 AM   #1470
bdubbs
Powerplay Quarterback
 
bdubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Sign me up for 1x inverted bowl please. That looks amazing.
bdubbs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 11:19 AM   #1471
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Trouble with the very tall stadiums is if someone Infront of you leans forward they block your view.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 11:21 AM   #1472
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Trouble with the very tall stadiums is if someone Infront of you leans forward they block your view.
The closer you are to the ice the less view this would block.
Scroopy Noopers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 11:54 AM   #1473
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Larger foot print potentially does bring the inverted bowl back in play. IIRC the inverted bowl could not be put in the smaller footprint.
Isn’t it the opposite? I thought the inverted bowl concept was about reducing the required footprint.
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 12:27 PM   #1474
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck View Post
Isn’t it the opposite? I thought the inverted bowl concept was about reducing the required footprint.
Not sure about the details, but they tried to put an inverted bowl in Event Centre 1.0 and the arena only had seating for 15000. The switched back to a conventional bowl to get the seating back to 18000+
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 12:39 PM   #1475
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1652019158866075648
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 12:41 PM   #1476
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

just rofl
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 12:41 PM   #1477
Rutuu
First Line Centre
 
Rutuu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

The team and city just signed the prototype "small town" afraid they're going to leave arena deal... Murray Edwards business extraordinaire runs CNRL in the Canadian oil patch, that lives off copying "what works" and is "cost effective"... And finally, the guy is the classic accounting CEO, where a low cost base trumps innovation.

When you add it up, the team is getting a value engineered "state of the art", "world class" arena like everyone else, not a leading edge, could fail design like the inverted bowl.

$40m up front on an $800m spend gets you full control in this scenario.
Rutuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 12:43 PM   #1478
puckbrain
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Default

what happens if smith loses the provincial vote?

will this make the arena agreement fall through?
puckbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 12:48 PM   #1479
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckbrain View Post
what happens if smith loses the provincial vote?

will this make the arena agreement fall through?
Notely said she is open to discussion on provincial funding, but she also said some things that make it sound like she wouldn't be that interested. I think she is trying to be ambiguous in order to not piss off anyone before the election. If I had to guess, she would pull the infrastructure funding from the City.

Whether or not the City and CSEC could still work something out, who knows. From the City's perspective, they have to constantly do infrastructure upgrades all the time, and some funding does come from the province. The fact the UCP was willing to give a big chunk up front was likely the main reason why the City was ready to chip in a lot of money for the arena, since they would be spending a lot on infrastructure anyway. I think they saw the arena funding as being cancelled out somewhat by the infrastructure money.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 12:48 PM   #1480
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Not sure about the details, but they tried to put an inverted bowl in Event Centre 1.0 and the arena only had seating for 15000. The switched back to a conventional bowl to get the seating back to 18000+
I also feel, I can't remember the exact details, that the larger budget brings the inverted bowl back into the conversation. Starting at $600m the last time may have pushed Rosetti out. I may be misremembering though.
Leeman4Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy