Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-14-2024, 11:54 AM   #14381
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Probably hired a crew to clean up the area and displace the junkies a few blocks for this production. Closed security perimeter to keep them safe.
That is a very Desantis thing to do...as evidenced by a crew actually trucking in and piling up hurricane debris yesterday as a backdrop for his presser.
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 11:07 AM   #14382
belsarius
First Line Centre
 
belsarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cranbrook
Exp:
Default

Apparently Trudeau has tried to advise Poilievre of members of his party that are at risk of foreign interference, but PP refuses to accept the information and continues to hide behind not getting security clearance.

Quote:
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has refused to get the security clearance necessary to be briefed on a list of people in his party who are vulnerable to foreign interference.

Trudeau told a public inquiry today he has directed Canada's spy service to inform Poilievre of the information so he can make decisions to protect the integrity of his party.

Trudeau said Poilievre, however, has opted not to receive classified briefings..
Trudeau says he has list of Conservatives vulnerable to foreign interference

At this point I just don't understand his constant fight for Canada to do something to deal with foreign interference, but his reluctance to do his part of the process to ensure the integrity of his party.
__________________
@PR_NHL
The @NHLFlames are the first team to feature four players each with 50+ points within their first 45 games of a season since the Penguins in 1995-96 (Ron Francis, Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Tomas Sandstrom).

Fuzz - "He didn't speak to the media before the election, either."
belsarius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to belsarius For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2024, 11:14 AM   #14383
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

At what point does his declining to get his security clearance move from 'get it so he can do his job' to 'get it so Canadians know he is not a security risk'?
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2024, 11:24 AM   #14384
Firebot
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Poilievre's continued reluctance to take security clearance, just makes him an easy target for attacks, and Trudeau is using this as an opportunity now. He should just take it and rip the bandaid off, and deal with what he sees.

Also, Trudeau needs to release the names. It's a clear deflection by Trudeau, considering that the PM and the government does have the ability to divulge the names, and has been fighting hard to withhold the names. But considering the Indian-Canada relations being what they are at the moment, it may be why Trudeau is opening up on the part of Indian involvement and how it implicates some Conservative party members.

Now foreign interference focus, which by what we know is expected to be mostly Liberals, has shifted to the Conservatives, likely involving Indian interference within the leadership race and in a byelection. There's one MP in particular who's been in rumours for a while of being potentially compromised and which the NDP has been vocal about.

https://www.ndp.ca/investigate-conse...PWS_NDP_EN_ALL

https://pressprogress.ca/csis-invest...e-sources-say/

So...let's release all the names. Poilievre need to step up and get his security clearance. Let's get the traitors and willing actors expelled, and repercussions should be had.

Last edited by Firebot; 10-16-2024 at 11:28 AM.
Firebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 11:37 AM   #14385
belsarius
First Line Centre
 
belsarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cranbrook
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot View Post
Poilievre's continued reluctance to take security clearance, just makes him an easy target for attacks, and Trudeau is using this as an opportunity now. He should just take it and rip the bandaid off, and deal with what he sees.

Also, Trudeau needs to release the names. It's a clear deflection by Trudeau, considering that the PM and the government does have the ability to divulge the names, and has been fighting hard to withhold the names. But considering the Indian-Canada relations being what they are at the moment, it may be why Trudeau is opening up on the part of Indian involvement and how it implicates some Conservative party members.

Now foreign interference focus, which by what we know is expected to be mostly Liberals, has shifted to the Conservatives, likely involving Indian interference within the leadership race and in a byelection. There's one MP in particular who's been in rumours for a while of being potentially compromised and which the NDP has been vocal about.

https://www.ndp.ca/investigate-conse...PWS_NDP_EN_ALL

https://pressprogress.ca/csis-invest...e-sources-say/

So...let's release all the names. Poilievre need to step up and get his security clearance. Let's get the traitors and willing actors expelled, and repercussions should be had.
I don't think he should just release the names. These are all unproven allegations from intelligence gathering, which is not in itself foolproof.

He also mentioned in his comments that the activities could be explained due to incomplete or shoddy intelligence, allegations from a single source, or have reasonable nuance to them.

Simply releasing the names of parliamentarians based on unproven suspicions could create even more problems than it helps. This shouldn't be about just ruining the names of people who may or may not be complicit. There is a reason the report is top secret and requires special clearances - this is not information that should be readily available to the masses.. hell the masses can't even make up their mind on proven scientific facts, let alone nuanced intelligence reports.

The best course of action is for PP to get his clearance, investigate and talk to the members of his own party. Any intelligence of actual criminality will already be acted upon by CSIS or the RCMP as required. This isn't like the Canadian intelligence community has evidence of wrongdoing and is just sitting on it.
__________________
@PR_NHL
The @NHLFlames are the first team to feature four players each with 50+ points within their first 45 games of a season since the Penguins in 1995-96 (Ron Francis, Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Tomas Sandstrom).

Fuzz - "He didn't speak to the media before the election, either."

Last edited by belsarius; 10-16-2024 at 11:50 AM.
belsarius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to belsarius For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2024, 11:37 AM   #14386
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot View Post
Poilievre's continued reluctance to take security clearance, just makes him an easy target for attacks, and Trudeau is using this as an opportunity now. He should just take it and rip the bandaid off, and deal with what he sees.

Also, Trudeau needs to release the names. It's a clear deflection by Trudeau, considering that the PM and the government does have the ability to divulge the names, and has been fighting hard to withhold the names. But considering the Indian-Canada relations being what they are at the moment, it may be why Trudeau is opening up on the part of Indian involvement and how it implicates some Conservative party members.

Now foreign interference focus, which by what we know is expected to be mostly Liberals, has shifted to the Conservatives, likely involving Indian interference within the leadership race and in a byelection. There's one MP in particular who's been in rumours for a while of being potentially compromised and which the NDP has been vocal about.

https://www.ndp.ca/investigate-conse...PWS_NDP_EN_ALL

https://pressprogress.ca/csis-invest...e-sources-say/

So...let's release all the names. Poilievre need to step up and get his security clearance. Let's get the traitors and willing actors expelled, and repercussions should be had.
CPC voters and members are such a feckless bunch that it probably wouldn't even move the needle if the evidence shows that PP is heavily implicated in this stuff.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2024, 12:36 PM   #14387
Firebot
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube View Post
CPC voters and members are such a feckless bunch that it probably wouldn't even move the needle if the evidence shows that PP is heavily implicated in this stuff.
At the moment CPC is polling at around 43%. 2021 CPC had 33%. So clearly there is a number of voters that are not voting based out of pure partisanship or ideology but on other factors.

Putting diehard partisans aside which exist within all parties, do you think that a huge revelation would not change the thoughts of some voters?
Firebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 02:22 PM   #14388
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot View Post
At the moment CPC is polling at around 43%. 2021 CPC had 33%. So clearly there is a number of voters that are not voting based out of pure partisanship or ideology but on other factors.

Putting diehard partisans aside which exist within all parties, do you think that a huge revelation would not change the thoughts of some voters?
Who would you vote for if this ends up being true?
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 02:56 PM   #14389
Firebot
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube View Post
Who would you vote for if this ends up being true?
What ends up being true?

I'm not voting for Liberals no matter what this election, same for NDP. If Poilievre is some type of Indian agent hired by Modi complicit to betray the country (if that is what you are trying to insinuate), he should step down and won't get my vote. But no one has earned it in that scenario.

I've voted for both Trudeau and Notley, so I have no problem voting for different parties as I deem fit.

Question that should be asked, would anything here influence your own vote considering your own stance?

Last edited by Firebot; 10-16-2024 at 03:05 PM.
Firebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 03:13 PM   #14390
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

I love the semantic gymnastics to not outright deny you'll vote CPC, spoken like a true technicality junkie
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 03:17 PM   #14391
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Considering his posting style there is no way firebot would have ever voted for Trudeau... lol
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 10:18 PM   #14392
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
I love the semantic gymnastics to not outright deny you'll vote CPC, spoken like a true technicality junkie
I mean it's pretty hilarious to say you're automatically not going to vote for a party, regardless of if they have the best policies. Rage-voting for a party out of spite is what super mature adults do.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 10:23 PM   #14393
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot View Post
What ends up being true?

I'm not voting for Liberals no matter what this election, same for NDP. If Poilievre is some type of Indian agent hired by Modi complicit to betray the country (if that is what you are trying to insinuate), he should step down and won't get my vote. But no one has earned it in that scenario.

I've voted for both Trudeau and Notley, so I have no problem voting for different parties as I deem fit.

Question that should be asked, would anything here influence your own vote considering your own stance?
When and why did you vote for Trudeau if you’re willing to share? I can’t see you voting him in over Harper’s last term. Sheer? Why would he be different than PP? Otoole was reasonable option and by then Trudeau was getting stinky but the PC Covid stuff was garbage. Did you vote Trudeau for this term because of Covid?
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2024, 11:36 PM   #14394
Doctorfever
First Line Centre
 
Doctorfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I understand PP basically called Trudeau a liar. Told him release all the names of those who may have acted on behalf of a foreign country.
__________________
____________________________________________
Doctorfever is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2024, 06:34 AM   #14395
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube View Post
CPC voters and members are such a feckless bunch that it probably wouldn't even move the needle if the evidence shows that PP is heavily implicated in this stuff.
Did all the Liberal scandals move the needle for Liberal voters over the past few elections? Of course not because CPC, Liberal, NDP, etc all have large feckless bunch of voters. Like come on man.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 10-17-2024, 06:53 AM   #14396
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I mean does this make sense to anyone?

Quote:
Between 6.8 billion and 10 billion litres of milk was discarded on Canadian dairy farms over 12 years, according to researchers based in Denmark, Michigan and Halifax's Dalhousie University. They found that the amount of tossed milk made up about seven per cent of milk produced on dairy farms over that time, and was valued at up to $14.9 billion.

In addition, researchers estimated that as much as 10 billion litres of milk was discarded, which contributed to "significant" land and water resource waste, and about 8.4 million tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions, or the amount of emissions from 350,000 passenger vehicles each year.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/billio...pact-1.7075470
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2024, 07:30 AM   #14397
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I believe it makes sense to dairy farmers.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2024, 07:54 AM   #14398
ThePrince
Scoring Winger
 
ThePrince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube View Post
Who would you vote for if this ends up being true?
Why would Trudeau be encouraging PP to get security clearance to review the names if PP was on the list of names? That would make no sense.
ThePrince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2024, 07:56 AM   #14399
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I have a very hard time believing that anyone with a shred of common sense would support a system that leads to that.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2024, 07:56 AM   #14400
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Did all the Liberal scandals move the needle for Liberal voters over the past few elections? Of course not because CPC, Liberal, NDP, etc all have large feckless bunch of voters. Like come on man.
Seems like it, since support for the Liberals has gone down each time and keeps going down.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy