Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2012, 01:00 PM   #1421
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Calgary Transit for not following city guidelines for providing service?

Does CT have this guideline for new communities? Does there need to be bus service as soon as 1 house gets built?
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 01:07 PM   #1422
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

I find the 302 is horribly inconsistent at the stops I use it at, for some reason. I have to take this bus everyday
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 01:21 PM   #1423
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
Calgary Transit for not following city guidelines for providing service?

Does CT have this guideline for new communities? Does there need to be bus service as soon as 1 house gets built?
From the article:

Quote:
The long fight for transit has been waged in several of Calgary’s newest suburbs, as communities reach the size that city guidelines say warrants a bus route — 500 homes — but the city’s strained budget doesn’t allow it.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 01:55 PM   #1424
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
Calgary Transit for not following city guidelines for providing service?

Does CT have this guideline for new communities? Does there need to be bus service as soon as 1 house gets built?
bizaro86 posted the answer from the article; I guess the next question is whether the City should be modifying that guideline based on current expansion within the city vis-a-vis capacity of Calgary transit?
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 02:00 PM   #1425
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvp2003 View Post
bizaro86 posted the answer from the article; I guess the next question is whether the City should be modifying that guideline based on current expansion within the city vis-a-vis capacity of Calgary transit?
What it is and what it should be are definitely two different questions, as you say.

I think it might make sense to provide great service to the areas that have transit, and then expand neighbourhood by neighbourhood as funds become available. Obviously, those buying new homes in new communities might have a different opinion, but if that strategy is laid out in advance then it's fair game, imo.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 02:16 PM   #1426
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvp2003 View Post
bizaro86 posted the answer from the article; I guess the next question is whether the City should be modifying that guideline based on current expansion within the city vis-a-vis capacity of Calgary transit?
New protocols about the introduction of service in new communities, including funding options (for example developer funded at first) is being considered in the RouteAhead Plan www.routeahead.ca
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2012, 11:06 AM   #1427
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Calgary kills transit smart card contract after repeated delays

Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/ca...#ixzz2BeiMBsgF
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 11:13 AM   #1428
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

From Madman's post, I thought the whole smart card Connect system was being canned. It's still going ahead, the City is simply looking for different suppliers/contractors to implement the system. Whew.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 11:25 AM   #1429
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurnedTheCorner View Post
From Madman's post, I thought the whole smart card Connect system was being canned. It's still going ahead, the City is simply looking for different suppliers/contractors to implement the system. Whew.
Yeah, sorry - just copied the Herald's headline, which could be read as having the entire thing cancelled.
Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Madman For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2012, 11:27 AM   #1430
Maccalus
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Exp:
Default

They should just hire the company that does london's and change the name to the "Prairie Oyster" card and be done with it.
Maccalus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Maccalus For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2012, 11:30 AM   #1431
taco.vidal
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Whats the difficulty with getting the smart card system up and running?

Cant CT look at what other major transit systems in North America are using and pick the one that best fits its needs and implement it? It seems like theyre trying to reinvent the wheel.
taco.vidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 11:32 AM   #1432
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taco.vidal View Post
Whats the difficulty with getting the smart card system up and running?

Cant CT look at what other major transit systems in North America are using and pick the one that best fits its needs and implement it? It seems like theyre trying to reinvent the wheel.
I think CT is definitely trying to implement a system like other cities in NA, it sounds like the contractor has simply dropped the ball.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:40 PM   #1433
Addick
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Addick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurnedTheCorner View Post
I think CT is definitely trying to implement a system like other cities in NA, it sounds like the contractor has simply dropped the ball.
As Calgary Transit was coming to the Smart Card party pretty late, I think they should have gone with a proven service provider. Although Calgary may be different than London and Hong Kong, I'm sure the makers of the Oyster Card and Octopus Card could have adequately customized the Connect card.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”

- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Addick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:17 PM   #1434
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Aww FFS - as someone tired of lining up for passes or tickets every month, as well as fumbling around for payment every morning - I'm super PO'ed that this has been delayed. Knowing Calgary Transit efficiency it'll probably be 3 years before something else gets implemented.

Even I knew that the MIFARE system was the way to go from the start...(newer more secure varieties anyways) Even Edmonton got this right....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIFARE
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 03:22 PM   #1435
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

You'd think at the very least the city could set up their transit ticket validation systems to print the time that the ticket will expire at, and not the time you validated the ticket. I absolutely see no purpose in printing the time you validated it at, except to make you better at adding 90 minutes to whatever time is printed out.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 04:10 PM   #1436
Addick
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Addick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse View Post
Even I knew that the MIFARE system was the way to go from the start...(newer more secure varieties anyways) Even Edmonton got this right....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIFARE
Just taking a look, it seems they did the Presto Card as well. Wasn't there a delay with that system in Ottawa? I think it is the same system they use in Toronto and I don't recall any major delays so maybe it was an exception. If it was, Calgary Transit should seriously look into them. Maybe they can sneak in with Edmonton.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”

- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Addick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 04:20 PM   #1437
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Hows the transit today with the snow fall? Or should I have posted this in the weather thread?

I take the 301 so hopefully its not too bad
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2012, 09:50 AM   #1438
yads
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Addick View Post
As Calgary Transit was coming to the Smart Card party pretty late, I think they should have gone with a proven service provider. Although Calgary may be different than London and Hong Kong, I'm sure the makers of the Oyster Card and Octopus Card could have adequately customized the Connect card.
According to that article, Telvent had implemented systems "for cities such as Madrid and Monterrey, Mexico, which like Calgary has buses and a busy light rail network"
yads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2012, 10:20 AM   #1439
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It would be interested as to know what the problems with Telvent were.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2012, 10:37 AM   #1440
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
It would be interested as to know what the problems with Telvent were.
Specifically the cards were not indicating the proper balance. There may be some other usability issues, but that was the oft quoted reason by Chabot and Nenshi.

They also said the card was supposed be extendable for other City of Calgary usage beyond transit payment, and it sounded like it came up short in that regard.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
c-train , calgary transit , information , lrt , renderings


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy