Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: How do you feel about the Hamilton trade?
Complete Steal! 540 58.76%
Great trade but not sure if it is a homerun. 235 25.57%
Cautiously optimistic that Flames won the trade. 95 10.34%
Even trade for both teams 24 2.61%
Boston will eventually win this trade. 11 1.20%
Rather have the picks. 14 1.52%
Voters: 919. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2015, 03:05 PM   #1421
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
The first 10 or so pages of this thread are awesome. Some of GIFs are hilarious.
Well I'm all caught up on CP (love removing the bold thread titles)
So what the hell, here we go...
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 03:18 PM   #1422
Firebot
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
Dog days of summer....just go back and read pages 6 to 16 as news unfolds of this trade and try not to have a smile on your face.
I've been reading the thread from start to finish at least once a week since the trade to relive the moment of the greatest heist in modern history.
Firebot is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Firebot For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 03:30 PM   #1423
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

The uncertainty over the cost was comedy.

Goes from maybe Bennett, to picks and poirier, to all picks so must mean two 1sts and a 2nd to lolzzzz.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 03:45 PM   #1424
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I never ever re-read threads, but I recommend everyone to do that. What rollar coaster.

-Talk of Hamilton being traded, Calgary in the talks. Everyone saying wishful thinking for the Flames
-Talks heat up. Word is Hamilton is headed to the Flames.
-Polak freaks out
-Confirmed to Calgary. No word on the return
-Polak freaks out
-Find out its only for picks
-WWF gifs all over
-Praise for Treliving

Can't wait for the season to start.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 04:05 PM   #1425
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

I still think there was more to this trade.

My step brother is a huge Oil fan, and he heard from somewhere that Chiarelli offered a bigger package than what Calgary paid, and told Boston that if they didn't trade him they were going to offer sheet him next year. Sweeney then turned around and sent him to Calgary for less as a big FU to the Oil.

Which would be absolutely awesome if it was true.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tron_fdc For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 04:06 PM   #1426
squirtle
Crash and Bang Winger
 
squirtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
I never ever re-read threads, but I recommend everyone to do that. What rollar coaster.

-Talk of Hamilton being traded, Calgary in the talks. Everyone saying wishful thinking for the Flames
-Talks heat up. Word is Hamilton is headed to the Flames.
-Polak freaks out
-Confirmed to Calgary. No word on the return
-Polak freaks out
-Find out its only for picks
-WWF gifs all over
-Praise for Treliving

Can't wait for the season to start.
I wasn't going to do it but you've convinced me.
squirtle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to squirtle For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 04:18 PM   #1427
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Haha, goo to know I'm not the only one who has read over this thread a few times to relive the awesomeness. It's too bad the mods permanently removed the "users viewing this thread" feature, as it would be pretty neat to see how many other users are viewing this thread at like 2pm on a Tuesday when it's off the page.

I wouldn't be surprised if there's almost always a couple people reading through.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 04:25 PM   #1428
homestand
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
I still think there was more to this trade.

My step brother is a huge Oil fan, and he heard from somewhere that Chiarelli offered a bigger package than what Calgary paid, and told Boston that if they didn't trade him they were going to offer sheet him next year. Sweeney then turned around and sent him to Calgary for less as a big FU to the Oil.

Which would be absolutely awesome if it was true.
A co-worker told me this story over a week ago and said he heard it on TSN.
homestand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 04:28 PM   #1429
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

It sounds like overdramatic BS to me

What's more likely is that we just offered a better package than everyone else. Easy to go to the media after losing out on a trade and whining "our package was so much better"
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 04:31 PM   #1430
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by homestand View Post
A co-worker told me this story over a week ago and said he heard it on TSN.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
It sounds like overdramatic BS to me

What's more likely is that we just offered a better package than everyone else. Easy to go to the media after losing out on a trade and whining "our package was so much better"
It was discussed by many reputable reporters (including Friedman I believe) that the oilers offered more. It's also public knowledge that Chiarelli let Sweeney know he'd be offer sheeting Hamilton.

We don't know Sweeney's motives, but it's not impossible
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 04:35 PM   #1431
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
It sounds like overdramatic BS to me

What's more likely is that we just offered a better package than everyone else. Easy to go to the media after losing out on a trade and whining "our package was so much better"
I believe it is well reported that for the Oilers, it was #16, #33, #57 and Nurse..... Edmonton wasn't willing to give up Nurse... so yes I would say we were given a discount.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 04:43 PM   #1432
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
I believe it is well reported that for the Oilers, it was #16, #33, #57 and Nurse..... Edmonton wasn't willing to give up Nurse... so yes I would say we were given a discount.
My understanding was that the Oilers had offered #16, #33 and #57.

And that the Bruins had asked for Nurse to be included (which may or may not have been instead of one of the picks).

Not that the 4 assets were all offered together.

Edit: I think it is safe to assume that the Bruins would have accepted the 3 picks plus Nurse - no matter how they felt about Chiarelli.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 04:55 PM   #1433
DoubleF
Franchise Player
 
DoubleF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Maybe Sweeney decided that because our 1st and second 2nd was higher, ours was a better offer than the Oiler's offer even though their first 2nd was higher. This would make him kinda dumb as #15 vs #16 against #33 vs #45 is quite significant especially in this draft and he skipped Connor and Barzal (was it?). Either way, we benefited from it.

As for the Oiler's "better" offer, I'm sure it could have been ameliorated with the additions of an extra second or thirds if necessary... so yes, I think a discount/spite theory could be entertained.
DoubleF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 05:03 PM   #1434
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Enouch - yes that is probably right. my bad

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleF View Post
Maybe Sweeney decided that because our 1st and second 2nd was higher, ours was a better offer than the Oiler's offer even though their first 2nd was higher. This would make him kinda dumb as #15 vs #16 against #33 vs #45 is quite significant especially in this draft and he skipped Connor and Barzal (was it?). Either way, we benefited from it.

As for the Oiler's "better" offer, I'm sure it could have been ameliorated with the additions of an extra second or thirds if necessary... so yes, I think a discount/spite theory could be entertained.
Doubt it since they were holding #13, and I'm sure negotiations were well underway (or already done?) for them to get #14, not sure the #15 vs #16 would be a risk to them for #33 and #45.. esp given who they picked.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 05:11 PM   #1435
handgroen
First Line Centre
 
handgroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

some cole's notes for the lazy


Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie View Post
I am dreading the update as I feel Bennett is gone. I could be wrong, but that is my gut reaction.

have to pay to get an asset that good

Happy but afraid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
prediction: Wotherpoon+Poirier+2016 1st
Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
Wow...wow. Now the return...
Quote:
Originally Posted by InCoGnEtO View Post
I hate this period of time where we don't know the full deal....
Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
wtf wtf wtf wtf.

This is terrifying. If one of the big 3 go I quit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
I'm excited but scared at the same time. Need to see what is going the other way.

Please don't be any of the big four: Monahan, Gaudreau, Bennett or Brodie
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
This is NOT fun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
cap space crunch makes it all possible!!!!!!!!

nice to see this space pay off
Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
fan 960 talking cfl lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf View Post
I would be shocked if its that

Boston basically opened up bidding, if thats the best they can get there's an issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
I predict

2015 1st
2015 2nd
2016 1st
Wotherspoon
Poirier
Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
YES it is
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schultzie View Post
Prepare your angus, guys.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Sutton View Post
I have a feeling Boston fans are going to be horribly disappointed, the B's are dealing froom a positioin of weakness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Huh? This is super fun!

We're acquiring one of the better big, young, Canadian defensemen in the game and it's terrifying and not fun?

Disagree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
My guess is 15th overall, Jankowski/Klimchuk, and 2nd rounder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
God I hope Treliving "skinned" Sweeney.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuck-Hater View Post
If its any of the big 5 (Gio, Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Brodie) its a bad trade IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by savardandjokinen View Post
Matt Larkin believes it is Bennett and 2015 first. He's just a writer not an insider
Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf View Post
watch Edmonton furiously trying to offersheet him right now
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
If our 1st is involved there is no chance bennett, gaudreau or monahan are involved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inglewood Jack View Post
details goddammit

my nose just started bleeding for no reason
Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
F5 f5 f5 f5
Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
i think the return will be underwhelming for bruins fans
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Trade call might still be going through:

gary lawless @garylawless
Flames GM Brad Trelivong pacing the draft room floor with phone stapled to his ear right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
If we gave up Gaudreau I will literally cry. The most exciting player we've ever had in my eyes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagal4321 View Post
Dean Molberg ‏@fan960boomer
Hearing Flames have given picks only in Hamilton deal
__________________


is your cat doing singing?
handgroen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to handgroen For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 05:24 PM   #1436
Matata
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

I remember being so certain it was bennett/gaudreau + 1st, how the hell else are you going to get a gm to give up a 22 y/o potential franchise dman?
Matata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 05:34 PM   #1437
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matata View Post
I remember being so certain it was bennett/gaudreau + 1st, how the hell else are you going to get a gm to give up a 22 y/o potential franchise dman?
Ya in fairness to all the other people panicing, while I too was sitting at my computer hitting F5 to see which of Monahan, Gaudreau, Bennett and Brodie it was (My guess was it was Gaudreau+15th for Hamilton+13th+2nd rounder)... in my eyes, there was NO way we could have got Hamilton without giving up a roster players... that is asinine.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phanuthier For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2015, 06:34 PM   #1438
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Is the 16, 33, 57 package better than 15, 45, 52? 2 of the Flames picks are higher than the Oiler picks. Sure the first 2nd round pick the Oil offered was 12 spots higher and the Flames first was only 1 higher and the other second was only 5 higher.

In my opinion those packages are pretty much the same. The Oilers had out the notion that they were considering an offer sheet and it was reported by several reporters.

Once Boston knew they were moving Dougie they decided to ship him west. Rumors were the jackets were interested likely offering 8th overall +. Arizona was in the mix as well with rumors they were offering one of their 2016 firsts (my guess is NYR) and likely their first from the Hawks.

With Calgary and Edmonton basically offering the same thing I am not surprised we won out. The Oilers were threatening the offer sheet, and the Bruins were in cap hell thanks to the Oilers GM so of course they are not going to do any favors to Chiarelli. Chia also looks like a genius if he acquired Hamilton and Boston did not need those optics as well
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 06:39 PM   #1439
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Is the 16, 33, 57 package better than 15, 45, 52?
Yes, without a doubt.

33rd vs 45th? Thats a HUGE difference

15 vs 16 is not a big difference when you are already holding 13th and 14th (I'm sure talks were close to finalizing and worked on for months by this point)... you'll get the guys you want. Especially when the guys you are targeting at that spot are Jake Debrusk and Zach Seynshyn... unless you knew Calgary was targetting those 2 guys. I
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 06:50 PM   #1440
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
Yes, without a doubt.

33rd vs 45th? Thats a HUGE difference

15 vs 16 is not a big difference when you are already holding 13th and 14th (I'm sure talks were close to finalizing and worked on for months by this point)... you'll get the guys you want. Especially when the guys you are targeting at that spot are Jake Debrusk and Zach Seynshyn... unless you knew Calgary was targetting those 2 guys. I
It is not a big enough difference in my opinion to say it is a much better package when dealing with the team where your former GM works and the team that will take advantage of the horrible cap hell that same GM caused the Bruins by signing Hamilton to an offer sheet
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy