Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2025, 04:15 PM   #14061
boogerz
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
I don't really think it's hard to explain.

Look at Tampa's depth on LW.

You have Geuntzel (30), Hagel (26) and Paul (30). Howard likely wants to play in a top 9 role. Tampa is stacked with good players who play their roles to a T. To boot, they are all signed until at least 2029.

If Howard intends on making the NHL and becoming an impact player, Tampa is simply not an ideal landing spot for him.
Tampa has been using Paul at center for the past couple seasons. There's definitely a third-line LW or RW spot that Isaac can grab.

Kid sounds really entitled. He should focus on establishing himself in NHL before thinking ahead to whether or not he can crack the Lightning's Top6
boogerz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to boogerz For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2025, 05:27 PM   #14062
iloveicedhockey
First Line Centre
 
iloveicedhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

There's a chance he just wants to play reasonably close to home with the wild.
iloveicedhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2025, 06:19 PM   #14063
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
Vancouver media also used the Tkachuk deal as the comparable for a Hughes trade with the caveat that Hughes is the better player, so the return would need to be better. They're thinking a top 6 forward like Huberdeau, a top 4 defenceman like Weegar, a 1st, and a better prospect than Schwindt.

If I'm the Devils, I just wait until Hughes is available for free though.
Tkachuk was a deal for a player under a long term contract because Florida was signing him while they were trading for him. Any team that trades for Hughes is getting him for 2 years, which would reduce the value.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2025, 06:28 PM   #14064
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Colorado got a haul for a few weeks of a great player. You’re arguing that Vancouver won’t because there is only 2 years left of a contract of an elite player. Just doesn’t make any sense at all.

Now, I’m not saying Van will get a haul. But the contract is not prohibitive. 2 years is two cup runs for some teams, which could be huge to add Hughes to. And a lot can change. Even if Hughes wants to play in NJ, there’s no guarantee, so (like e’ve seen countless times) it’s entirely possible he finds a better fit than Vancouver and sticks there well beyond 2 years.

Either way, this idea that NJ can just wait this out until free agency has no actual basis in reality. It just doesn’t happen.
The Rantanen trade is probably a comparable for Hughes. Not sure a haul is a top 6 winger, a 4th line forward, a 2nd and a 4th but it may be.

A comparable package would be something like Meier, Nathan Bastian, and two 2nd round picks for Hughes.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2025, 07:28 PM   #14065
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

This may be why Howard fell in the 2022 draft. McKenzie had him at 20 and Wheeler had him at 10 just before the draft…. He probably told teams he wouldn’t sign with them.

Lots of the better teams traded their picks that year too.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to YyjFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2025, 08:21 AM   #14066
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
I don't really think it's hard to explain.

Look at Tampa's depth on LW.

You have Geuntzel (30), Hagel (26) and Paul (30). Howard likely wants to play in a top 9 role. Tampa is stacked with good players who play their roles to a T. To boot, they are all signed until at least 2029.

If Howard intends on making the NHL and becoming an impact player, Tampa is simply not an ideal landing spot for him.
And given that Tampa has shown zero reluctance to trade away futures to help them win now, there’s a good chance Howard would have been dealt away in this offseason anyway. From his POV, better to walk and have some choice over where he winds up, than get dealt by TB to some random rebuilding team.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2025, 09:25 AM   #14067
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
Tkachuk was a deal for a player under a long term contract because Florida was signing him while they were trading for him. Any team that trades for Hughes is getting him for 2 years, which would reduce the value.
I'd argue that if Hughes is going to NJ then it's to be for the long term.

If the Hughes brothers want to play together, NJ is by far their best option. Luke is under control but them for a while. Then, which teams have room for three relatively large contracts
I can remember a couple of times where two players left to one destination to play together, but three would be an extremely rare occurrence.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 10:02 AM   #14068
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
I'd argue that if Hughes is going to NJ then it's to be for the long term.

If the Hughes brothers want to play together, NJ is by far their best option. Luke is under control but them for a while. Then, which teams have room for three relatively large contracts
I can remember a couple of times where two players left to one destination to play together, but three would be an extremely rare occurrence.
If Hughes is willing to sign longterm with only one team (or is perceived to be only willing to sign longterm with one team) it would be different because Tkachuk was willing to sign longterm with more than one team. Point is if Jersey is the only team that can have him for more than one year they would be negotiating against themselves.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 02:03 PM   #14069
rollie619
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

(nm)

Last edited by rollie619; 05-05-2025 at 10:36 AM. Reason: No longer wanted
rollie619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 02:10 PM   #14070
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

That would be idiotic by Conroy
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 02:10 PM   #14071
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

My thoughts are thank goodness you are not the GM. A potential superstar for a top 6 winger ? A team already overflowing with wingers goes out and gets another. Plus a 1st round pick ? wtf
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 02:16 PM   #14072
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Oooooof that would be a terrible trade for the Flames. Parekh could only go for an age appropriate centre with #1C upside.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2025, 02:18 PM   #14073
AustinL_NHL
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rollie619 View Post
If Toronto came calling with Knies on the table for Parekh and the #22 pick this year, I think Conroy at least listens. Knies is NHL-ready, plays a heavy game, and has already produced in playoff hockey. He’d fit like a glove with Zary and Coronato — and could give us a controllable top-6 winger for the next decade.

Yes, Parekh has a higher ceiling as a puck-moving D — no doubt — but how many of those actually hit? And we already have Poirier, Kuznetsov, and Suniev in the pipeline. Depth is fine.

The #22? Sure, it stings. But that pick’s not helping us anytime soon, and Knies brings immediate value.

Would love to hear from Leafs fans lurking — would they even do that deal? From our side, I think it’s a classic “bird in hand vs two in the bush” debate.

Thoughts?
I don't think you got enough sleep last night
AustinL_NHL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 02:19 PM   #14074
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Parekh is better than Knies today and by the looks of his first game… ya… he’s got high upside. I really haven’t been too impressed by Knies whenever I watch him. Like he’s fine, he’s clearly an NHLer, but Parekh? Not a chance.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 02:29 PM   #14075
CF84
Powerplay Quarterback
 
CF84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The real "Cowtown"
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rollie619 View Post
If Toronto came calling with Knies on the table for Parekh and the #22 pick this year, I think Conroy at least listens. Knies is NHL-ready, plays a heavy game, and has already produced in playoff hockey. He’d fit like a glove with Zary and Coronato — and could give us a controllable top-6 winger for the next decade.

Yes, Parekh has a higher ceiling as a puck-moving D — no doubt — but how many of those actually hit? And we already have Poirier, Kuznetsov, and Suniev in the pipeline. Depth is fine.

The #22? Sure, it stings. But that pick’s not helping us anytime soon, and Knies brings immediate value.

Would love to hear from Leafs fans lurking — would they even do that deal? From our side, I think it’s a classic “bird in hand vs two in the bush” debate.

Thoughts?
First, Suniev is not a defenseman and Yan Kuznetsov is a defensive D-man. Did you possibly mean Mews, Morin, and Brzustewicz instead of those guys?

You just don't trade a potentially game breaking player for a good winger. Parekh already looked like the most skilled player on the ice for the Flames aside from Wolf in his first game. The Flames just don't need wingers even if Knies would be a nice piece. He doesn't even shoot right.

Last edited by CF84; 05-06-2025 at 01:58 PM.
CF84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 04:21 PM   #14076
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Rare you see a trade proposal so bad the person asks the mods to delete any trace of his post.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2025, 04:24 PM   #14077
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

This trade proposal was brought to you by Jack Daniel’s.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mrdonkey For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2025, 04:25 PM   #14078
Jiggy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
This trade proposal was brought to you by Jack Daniel’s.
It's probably Tre's CP burner account
Jiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 08:26 PM   #14079
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

99% of the board wouldn't trade parekh for the 1st overall pick this year. So you can be certain that a player like Knies is absolutely not in the ballpark.

Ultimately though Zayne has more value to us than anyone. I imagine he has more value than that trade to anyone, but more to the flames even.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2025, 09:18 PM   #14080
robertsfanatic
Powerplay Quarterback
 
robertsfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

Parekh and Wolf are as untouchable as you can get for the Flames.
__________________
*Disclaimer: I am a "glass half full" Flames fan.
robertsfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy