Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-21-2023, 01:50 PM   #14001
camm13
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan View Post
And this is why just looking at stats is useless.

Go read the opinion of Avalanche fans on Johansen. They hate the guy. They hate his compete level. They hate that he's totally reliant on the PP to produce points. They hate is aloof approach to the game.

He's currently the 2c on the third highest scoring team in the league and is on pace for just 30 points.

They need an upgrade.

exactly this. 9 of his 12 points is from the PP.
camm13 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to camm13 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 01:50 PM   #14002
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
What am I missing? How would getting closer to the deadline help a team that's already using LTIR, and not banking cap-space?

Also, how would they fit Lekhonen when he gets back if they get Lindholm without sending salary back? Lekhonen was week to week with a neck injury in NOV, I don't know when he's getting back, but I doubt he would miss the rest of the season. That would leave them about $1.1M of LTIR.

The only wild card in all this is Girard. He's currently in the player assistance program, but I don't know if COL can put him on LTIR.
While Colorado is not building cap-space, Lindholm's cap hit is declining.

At the trade deadline Lindholm has about $1.06M against the cap remaining. So yeah, if they're holding $1.1M in LTIR at that time? It fits...?


(...LTIR has always been a cluster !@#$ in my head though, so who knows)
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 01:51 PM   #14003
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Tough pill to swallow.
Flames1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Flames1217 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 01:53 PM   #14004
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
...damn. Talk about an alternate timeline. Things would have played out so different.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 01:55 PM   #14005
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
...damn. Talk about an alternate timeline. Things would have played out so different.
That was the deal that didn't happen because tree held Valimaki out of the deal only to subsequently lose him a couple seasons later on waivers.

Yeah, it's a stinger.

Probably wouldn't have lost our American players and no Huberdeau and no Kadri.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 01:58 PM   #14006
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Wonder if Tkachuk was part of this? at the time thats what I was hearing, but he wouldn't agree to an extension in buffalo. Johnny on Eichels wing would've been so fun to watch here
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:00 PM   #14007
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
That was the deal that didn't happen because tree held Valimaki out of the deal only to subsequently lose him a couple seasons later on waivers.

Yeah, it's a stinger.

Probably wouldn't have lost our American players and no Huberdeau and no Kadri.
No that was the Mark Stone deal. They wanted Valimaki from us or Brannstrom from the knights
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 02:01 PM   #14008
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan View Post
And this is why just looking at stats is useless.

Go read the opinion of Avalanche fans on Johansen. They hate the guy. They hate his compete level. They hate that he's totally reliant on the PP to produce points. They hate is aloof approach to the game.

He's currently the 2c on the third highest scoring team in the league and is on pace for just 30 points.

They need an upgrade.
He also is on place for 30 goals. I don't care what the fans think of him at $4M that is good production. So what if he gets his goals on the PP, that is still a lot of goals to dump when you don't have to.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:01 PM   #14009
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
That was the deal that didn't happen because tree held Valimaki out of the deal only to subsequently lose him a couple seasons later on waivers.

Yeah, it's a stinger.

Probably wouldn't have lost our American players and no Huberdeau and no Kadri.
Nah, at the time Valimaki was not so hot... Think you're thinking about the Stone deal.

He may have been a part of a potential deal, but I think the chatter was around the F prospects and then Tkachuk got name dropped leading up to the actual trade. As I remember, people were game to send Tkachuk, prospect and a first leading into Chucky's breakout year.

In hindsight, still would have been much better for us than what actually happened.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 02:07 PM   #14010
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
Wonder if Tkachuk was part of this? at the time thats what I was hearing, but he wouldn't agree to an extension in buffalo. Johnny on Eichels wing would've been so fun to watch here
Tkachuk’s name was in the rumour mill for sure but both Tre and the Sabres GM said he was never offered. I was on board for it at the time though. If only Tkachuk wasn’t on a terrible bridge deal.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:12 PM   #14011
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
While Colorado is not building cap-space, Lindholm's cap hit is declining.

At the trade deadline Lindholm has about $1.06M against the cap remaining. So yeah, if they're holding $1.1M in LTIR at that time? It fits...?


(...LTIR has always been a cluster !@#$ in my head though, so who knows)
No, LTIR space doesn't accumulate over time like unused cap space does. This is because an injured player is still being paid and counting against your cap the same as he would if he was playing. LTIR just allows you to exceed the cap by the value of the injured player's cap hit.

If you have $2 million in unused cap space from the start of the season until the trade deadline, you could add players with roughly $8 million in cap hit. If you have $2 million in unused LTIR space from the start of the season, you can only use it to add a player with a $2 million cap hit, regardless of when you do it.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:13 PM   #14012
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
While Colorado is not building cap-space, Lindholm's cap hit is declining.

At the trade deadline Lindholm has about $1.06M against the cap remaining. So yeah, if they're holding $1.1M in LTIR at that time? It fits...?


(...LTIR has always been a cluster !@#$ in my head though, so who knows)
I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way. The player's AAV is used for LTIR calculations, in Lindholm's case it would still be $4.85M.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:19 PM   #14013
saillias
#1 Goaltender
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

The details posted from Weekes were Tkachuk, Mangiapane and a 1st? Not sure that would have been an even trade. Supposedly Buffalo didn't think those players would want to stay whereas Vegas had Tuch in their package who is a hometown guy. Also trading your star kinda defeats the purpose, but maybe suggested that Tre knew in advance that Tkachuk wanted out. All very speculative though.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 02:20 PM   #14014
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
Tough pill to swallow.
Sure was, I rank not going all in for Eichel as Trelivings biggest mistake, even if Tkachuk was involved Buffalo would have had time to convince him to stay or got a haul for him the next year.

Eichel may have loved it here too as he and Hanifin are close buddy's
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Snuffleupagus For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 02:21 PM   #14015
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

I think it was Tkachuk for sure.
They had to all deny it when it didn't happen but there was a lot of smoke.
And it's a deal that would have made sense.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 02:21 PM   #14016
dirk diggler
First Line Centre
 
dirk diggler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camm13 View Post
exactly this. 9 of his 12 points is from the PP.
sounds like an Oiler player, cant cut it 5 on 5.
dirk diggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:31 PM   #14017
HitterD
Powerplay Quarterback
 
HitterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In my office...is it 5:00 yet???
Exp:
Default

Yeah to be so close to Stone and Eichel, and lose both to Vegas really stings, these moves really put them over the top for the cup and they were willing to give up what it took to get the team-altering trades done. Full credit to them and it worked.

Who knows what the Flames would have accomplished if Tre was willing to part with the assets needed to get those 2 players but if you don’t pay to play you will never find out what you are capable of.

Hopefully a lesson learned for the new management group here to go for it when the time is right after this next retool
HitterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:35 PM   #14018
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I think it was Tkachuk for sure.
They had to all deny it when it didn't happen but there was a lot of smoke.
And it's a deal that would have made sense.
If that's the case, then surely management would have discussed with Tkachuk what his intentions of staying with the Flames long-term were. Which means that Tkachuk likely lied about those intentions. Maybe Tkachuk wasn't such a great guy to the Flames after all.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 02:38 PM   #14019
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD View Post
Yeah to be so close to Stone and Eichel, and lose both to Vegas really stings, these moves really put them over the top for the cup and they were willing to give up what it took to get the team-altering trades done. Full credit to them and it worked.

Who knows what the Flames would have accomplished if Tre was willing to part with the assets needed to get those 2 players but if you don’t pay to play you will never find out what you are capable of.

Hopefully a lesson learned for the new management group here to go for it when the time is right after this next retool
Stone deal fell apart when he said he wouldn’t sign in Calgary, so that one is what it is. I’ll still blame Tre for Eichel because he cornered himself into Tkachuk’s bridge contract.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2023, 02:45 PM   #14020
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I think it was Tkachuk for sure.
They had to all deny it when it didn't happen but there was a lot of smoke.
And it's a deal that would have made sense.
I'd bet it was Lindy or Hanifin involved. Both had term left on great deals (and I think we know Buffalo has had interested in Hanifin).

At the time the Flames were after another top six forward...so it wouldn't have shocked me if it was Hanifin + + +
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy