[GT] Flames Vs Wild

[Mathgod]

Flames never get those calls.

[expo2428]

Yes the angle behind the net where you can only see the goalies back will be the angle to show it lol

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

One of those logic without visual evidence situations

League tends not to air on the side of logic

[btimbit]

Sadly the right call

[Phaneuf_Phan]

Smart goalie to block the camera's view

[cannon7]

Not like you can put a device inside the puck to be certain.

[FusionX]

You see it disappear between the arm/body there. I mean, the body without the puck is at least 90% behind the line, but not surprising it's waved off.

[PuckSlap]

Originally Posted by SuperMatt18

Huberdeau should have shot that but I think that puck is in but you have no way to tell.

Ridiculous not to just have a better way to tell if the puck crossed he line in 2023

Like an apple airtag Duct Taped to it.

Or a sensor in the puck

Sent from my SM-S918W using Tapatalk

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

Derek Wills thinks the puck was in guys.

[Macindoc]

Puck was obviously in because there was no part of the puck over the blue paint or goal line, and the part of Gustaffson that it was under was entirely behind the goal line. Problem is that you know where it is but you can’t see it because it is under the goalie.

[Nelson]

Wow. The Flames almost scored a power play goal.

[SuperMatt18]

It's a bit funny though that all of Backlund, Coleman, and Huberdeau had a chance at the empty net and all three of them flubbed it up in different ways

[3rd liner]

Bad luck. Can’t call that a goal definitively, even though logic tells you it is in.

[Macindoc]

Interference on Backlund on the zone entry attempt that went for icing was egregious

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

Originally Posted by SuperMatt18

It's a bit funny though that all of Backlund, Coleman, and Huberdeau had a chance at the empty net and all three of them flubbed it up in different ways

Yips.

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

TBL 2-0 No Goods

[GioforPM]

Radio announcers should know the rules. Wills “that puck is probably in but you HAVEto see it go In.”

No, you don’t. It’s rare but if there’s no doubt they can call it even if the puck isn’t visible. Saw it versus Louongo once

[expo2428]

Now let's see how they respond versus the NHLs worst penalty kill

[NewFan]

Flames PP means Pathetic Play.

[GioforPM]

Correct call. Martin with a nasty slash on Vladar, Weegar with a medium cross check and Martin with a helmet pull off.