Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2019, 08:01 AM   #121
smiggy77
Powerplay Quarterback
 
smiggy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burner View Post
every team flies on chartered private jets - and there is always food at the arena including chefs around after the morning skate to make sure they are fed right.
No most teams take commercial airliner chartered jets that stop at the main airports.

Private jets stop at private secluded airports.

Yes, but when your team is making 100 million more than the rest, there is significant additional perks where the players are treated really well.

I'll see where I can dig up the article from years ago about this.
smiggy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 08:03 AM   #122
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burner View Post
every team flies on chartered private jets - and there is always food at the arena including chefs around after the morning skate to make sure they are fed right.
While obviously true, this takes basically nothing away from Smiggy77's point. It's no secret than the Rangers have more money than Carolina.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 08:05 AM   #123
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smiggy77 View Post
No most teams take commercial airliner chartered jets that stop at the main airports.

Private jets stop at private secluded airports.

Yes, but when your team is making 100 million more than the rest, there is significant additional perks where the players are treated really well.

I'll see where I can dig up the article from years ago about this.
not to mention, its NYC

that has an allure all on its own...while i understand it isn't for everyone, if you are rich, young and an athlete in NYC, you could have a damn good time living in Manhattan.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2019, 08:26 AM   #124
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Atom Fox
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 08:34 AM   #125
Sutter4Mayor
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Sutter4Mayor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
Atom Fox


Sutter4Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 08:34 AM   #126
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
not to mention, its NYC

that has an allure all on its own...while i understand it isn't for everyone, if you are rich, young and an athlete in NYC, you could have a damn good time living in Manhattan.
Yeah. Poor Kevin Hayes. From Broadway to Portage & Main. Oof
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2019, 08:34 AM   #127
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

I really wish they'd fix this with the NCAA. Alan is the latest example, but there seems to be one or two black eyes every off-season and there's still no fix?

I think it's awesome that these guys have a chance to finish their education, as the NHL career is short and a Harvard education to go along with your NHL millions pays off a mountain of hard work to get there (imagine being NHL calibre and Harvard educated). The NHL doesn't need to be packed with slight 18 year olds anyway.

But, it's a negative instead. The Canes (would have been the Flames) get screwed and it's an odd avenue to get to the NHL. Let the kids finish education if that's their route, and let the NHL team that drafted them have the same post-education ELC opportunities they have with their other draftees.

But it's silly that this isn't fixed yet. I would love to see more kids coming from the NCAA and U Sports route, but the NCAA route is worrisome to anyone investing draft picks. I would love to see a common thought start moving through prospects in 'should I spend 2-4 more years dominating these junior leagues... or do I go to College/University to grow my game and career?'.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 08:37 AM   #128
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Funny how many people around here dismissed concerns about Fox (and other drafted college players) not signing with the Flames. We were told it almost never happens.

Well, it happens. There's a legit risk in drafting players - especially American-born players - who go the college route. Management needs to take this risk into account when drafting, same way they have to take the Russian factor into account.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 08:40 AM   #129
Burner
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Burner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: winnipeg
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smiggy77 View Post
No most teams take commercial airliner chartered jets that stop at the main airports.

Private jets stop at private secluded airports.

Yes, but when your team is making 100 million more than the rest, there is significant additional perks where the players are treated really well.

I'll see where I can dig up the article from years ago about this.
Be interested to read it - most NHL Teams have chartered busses that leave the arena and drive right up to the plane on the tarmac - they clear security in the building so really not sure what great perk a private secluded airport is.
Burner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 08:45 AM   #130
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology View Post
It. Is. Not. A. Loophole.

The NHL treats college and junior players the same. Two years to sign a junior player, or they re-enter the draft, two more years to sign or they become UFA. Just like college. It’s a trade off, sign the player early and leave him in junior, or he re-enters the draft, or hold his rights for 4 years, but signing him ends his eligibility in college.

The NCAA needs to stop prohibiting their athletes from signing contracts, at which point they should be allowed to be treated exactly like junior players.

The NHL should do nothing. You’ve invested nothing but an opportunity in the player. They owe the drafting team nothing.
For sure it's not a loop hole, but it effectively is given how the four years roll out for the two cases.

College kids play and go to school while picking up stats and building their payday.

Junior kids play two overage years, go back into the draft, don't sign again and then do what?

Effectively they're different even if officially they're the same.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2019, 08:49 AM   #131
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smiggy77 View Post
Lol I don't get the hate for Cobra. While maybe not majority of the board, a lot of people were freaking out and calling for Tre's head.

Ain't nothing wrong with calling out the people who pull out the pitchforks at every opportunity.
I think he would have been fine if he didn't toss out the word majority.

There was certainly a large contingent that went way over the top to the negative on that fateful afternoon.

I liked the deal from the get go, but it just got better and better and better since.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2019, 08:50 AM   #132
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology View Post

The NCAA needs to stop prohibiting their athletes from signing contracts, at which point they should be allowed to be treated exactly like junior players.
That's not going to happen. Why would the NCAA change their system to make the NHL happy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology View Post
The NHL should do nothing. You’ve invested nothing but an opportunity in the player. They owe the drafting team nothing.
The NHL works for the owners. If enough owners are unhappy about getting left with nothing from drafted NCAA players, the NHL will change its rules. Because the NHL has no influence with the NCAA.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 09:02 AM   #133
Kasi
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Burnaby
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smiggy77 View Post
Lol I don't get the hate for Cobra. While maybe not majority of the board, a lot of people were freaking out and calling for Tre's head.

Ain't nothing wrong with calling out the people who pull out the pitchforks at every opportunity.
If you go by simple definition of majority as 50% + 1 and limit that to the people who were posting in that thread than cobra is quite right. More people were calling for Tre’s head than those who liked the trade.
Kasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 09:09 AM   #134
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

If a drafted player decides not to sign, could they not return that pick in the next years draft? So say you have the 15th pick in 2018, he doesn't sign, then in 2019 you get the 15th pick again, and everyone behind drops one slot?
Fuzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 09:20 AM   #135
Yamer
Franchise Player
 
Yamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Red Deer
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I think he would have been fine if he didn't toss out the word majority.

There was certainly a large contingent that went way over the top to the negative on that fateful afternoon.

I liked the deal from the get go, but it just got better and better and better since.
The trade was a great example of how I personally over-value Flames players, even when I didn't think I did.

I was stunned that they moved Hamilton, and at first completely ignored the return. Then I heard Fox was included and it made it worse. Yet, here the Flames were getting two core pieces back for one, a player who had played himself out of the roster/salary structure, and an unknown. Forced me to take a step back and evaluate things more objectively.

Who cares about the Canes, the Flames got substantially better with this trade. I'm happy Dougie is slotting in well with a Carolina team that surprised me, and I hope Ferland gets his payday and has a long career. I'm indifferent to Fox.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey."
-'Badger' Bob Johnson (1931-1991)

"I see as much misery out of them moving to justify theirselves as them that set out to do harm."
-Dr. Amos "Doc" Cochran
Yamer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Yamer For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2019, 09:20 AM   #136
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

This typically only happens in late round picks that drastically increase their value after their draft. Vesey was a 3rd rounder as was Fox. Hayes was a 1st rounder and maybe the Hawks could have signed him if they made the effort earlier.

Most 1st rounders will sign with their team because they only play 1 year old college max and are unlikely to wait out the 4 years.

Flames are fortunate that Jankowski signed when he could have walked and obviously happy they got Johnny to leave early
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2019, 09:59 AM   #137
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

You can't really compare junior hockey players to college players because college players have more incentive to not sign.

No junior player is going to refuse an NHL contract just so they can play a couple of extra years in junior. They might refuse if they are close to re-entering the draft and their draft team is low balling them or maybe if they really hated the team that draft them and want to roll the dice 2 years later. But how many examples are there of junior players that refuse to sign so they can play out 4 years in junior?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 10:12 AM   #138
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

If I've read the draft rules correctly, an individual doesn't necessarily have to "opt in" into the draft if they're of a certain age. If you can be drafted without your consent, I don't see any problem with players maximizing their leverage.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 10:14 AM   #139
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Maybe one question is why don’t more junior players take the opportunity their hockey skill provides and pursue a college education?
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2019, 10:18 AM   #140
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamer View Post
The trade was a great example of how I personally over-value Flames players, even when I didn't think I did.

I was stunned that they moved Hamilton, and at first completely ignored the return. Then I heard Fox was included and it made it worse. Yet, here the Flames were getting two core pieces back for one, a player who had played himself out of the roster/salary structure, and an unknown. Forced me to take a step back and evaluate things more objectively.

Who cares about the Canes, the Flames got substantially better with this trade. I'm happy Dougie is slotting in well with a Carolina team that surprised me, and I hope Ferland gets his payday and has a long career. I'm indifferent to Fox.
I really appreciate this kind of post. So much better to read than the self congratulatory pats on the back or the attacks on other posters.

I had no idea Lindholm was this good. I thought they received little to no value for Fox. And I thought there was a good chance they traded away the two best players in the deal.

I am pleasantly surprised at how the deal has turned out so far and will readily admit I was wrong.

Now let’s hope the playoffs turn out to be as rewarding as the regular season has been. That where the real winners are decided.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy