Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Should the Flames add Iginla if the cost is reasonable?
Yes 357 50.78%
No 346 49.22%
Voters: 703. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2017, 09:19 AM   #121
skudr248
First Line Centre
 
skudr248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winchestertonfieldville Jail
Exp:
Default

No we shouldnt
skudr248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 09:20 AM   #122
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

People who think Iginla can come back and play with Monahan and Gaudreau are not ready to have Iginla back.

People who think Iginla is 4th, or *maybe* 3rd line RW are ready to have Iginla back.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Buff For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 09:22 AM   #123
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel View Post
No!.

It's like wanting to get back with an ex you were with for years. Yes the fore play and sex was great but the underlying issues why it didn't work the first time never is really resolved and the relationship will only end in heart break again.
But for 2 months the sex is great.

The key for me is 4th or lower and a conversation with Iggy that his role starts as 4th line RW with 10 minutes a night plus 2nd group PP time. If he is okay with the role and the price is right then I'd be happy to have him back
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 09:26 AM   #124
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

We Got It From Here... Thank You 4 Your Service
troutman is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 09:31 AM   #125
kukkudo
#1 Goaltender
 
kukkudo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

A 38 year old Iginla is not playing in a top 6 role. But Iginla with Bennett and Versteg on the 3rd line would be good. Some PP time and thats what you would get out of him.
kukkudo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kukkudo For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 09:45 AM   #126
t0rrent98
Powerplay Quarterback
 
t0rrent98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Exp:
Default

Think I read a article about a week or two ago saying that Iginla would be happy to just be traded to a playoff team. He just wants one more crack at the playoffs and if they made it to the cup finals its good on him.
__________________

CPHL Dallas Stars
t0rrent98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 09:47 AM   #127
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

As awful as it sounds, I'm just not all that nostalgic for a return of Iggy. I've watched him play in Colorado and he's not the same player at all and has a lot of trouble keeping up. I'm not sure that I want that Old Yeller moment with Iggy not being able to keep up on the play.

As well, its not like Iggy just left, its been a while and we have a new locker room, I'm not sure about the return of Iggy into that room where the younger leaders out of some sense of twisted hero worship step back for Iggy.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 09:49 AM   #128
united
#1 Goaltender
 
united's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

Iginla and Brouwer on the same team would be interesting given their rocky history and the trash talk directed Iginla's way by Brouwer in the past (non-racial before any dumb assumptions are made). As pros, I'm sure they would get on with things quickly and leave that in the past, but it would be awkward at first.
__________________
"I think the eye test is still good, but analytics can sure give you confirmation: what you see...is that what you really believe?"
Scotty Bowman, 0 NHL games played
united is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 09:51 AM   #129
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

I am on the Patrick Eaves train. Pinder raised this on the morning show. I had not considered this but this seems like a much better option. 21G/16A costs less than 1M, can play both wings.
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 09:53 AM   #130
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkflames View Post
I am on the Patrick Eaves train. Pinder raised this on the morning show. I had not considered this but this seems like a much better option. 21G/16A costs less than 1M, can play both wings.
The problem with Eaves is there is going to be a bidding war. TSN reported last night 10-12 teams expressed interest.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 09:53 AM   #131
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
I doubt he is an upgrade over Versteeg or Brouwer.

However he is not quick enough any longer to play on the top 2 lines.

Sure he could play the 4th line....

However, he is not the type of a player that is suited to be a grinder.
He isn't that slow. Watch some of his games.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 09:57 AM   #132
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

The passion that this question generates never ceases to amaze me.

It's a game. He's one player. It would be short term.

The world will not come to an end if this isn't played out in whatever way some of you feel it needs to.

If he came here, it would certainly spice up the entertainment level. And while I doubt he could add a whole lot with respect to skills on the ice, I have little doubt that his motivation and energy levels would be a positive thing.

If he doesn't come here, no worries.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 10:04 AM   #133
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

He's still got a great shot and a great one timer, and he is more than willing to fight to protect teammates or send a message or just fire the team up.

If the Flames make the playoffs they're most likely facing the Wild, and they are going to need players to literally fight back against all the stick work that team does. Getting your face pounded in by old man Iggy might actually be a deterrent for some of them.

We've all seen the momentum of games turn on a fight, and seeing Iggy tune up a Wild player at the dome could turn a game or the series. Nobody thinks the Flames would be getting 40 goal scored Iginla back, but getting a guy to help out Engelland in the rough games could be huge and the acquisition cost should be minimal.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mikephoen For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 10:06 AM   #134
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

I think he can contribute. He's an upgrade over Chiasson, no one can argue otherwise. I personally think he's an upgrade over Brouwer. He has a better shot, he's tougher, and thinks the game better. He also has the same stats (minus 1 goal), and no one on that COL team is putting up numbers close to what they're capable of. Iggy is one season removed from 22g - 25a.

If Iggy doesn't cost much, what's the harm? He immediately becomes the 3rd RWer who can play on the PP.

Plus, is there a better story possible?
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bourque's Twin For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 10:10 AM   #135
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meh View Post
Is this a serious question?
Come-on.. NO..
He deserves a Cup. Jerome did his time here and it's done.
......unless Wideman goes the other way...then maybe.
Is this a serious post? Jerome
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 10:10 AM   #136
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Iginla is better than Chaisson and Bouma with out question. Zero harm in bringing him here.

Don't think he's the solution to our first line problems though however I think he'd be more successful there than Ferland.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 10:11 AM   #137
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Next time the Flames host a Heritage Classic he can play in the Alumni game.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2017, 10:11 AM   #138
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I was against it originally but I am coming around.

It would be for a limited time, and he would be done at the end of the season anyways. Plus I don't think having him here is going to make us any worse than having Chiasson on the 4th line RW.

Let him finish his career a Flame, and hopefully we get into the playoffs. Anything after that that he contributes would be gravy.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 10:15 AM   #139
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

If we acquire him PLUS and a RW that actually solves our top 6 need, I'm all for it.

I like where we're at defensively, I have confidence Elliott can handle it down the stretch (but wouldn't be opposed to acquiring some insurance in that area) but we're brutal on the RW. Iggy may not be playing his best, but the marks on him are a little much. He can still keep up with game speed, his flaws are just a little more obvious than they were 5 years ago. He'd still be an improvement over what we currently have.

In short: Absolutely, as a way to improve the bottom six. But no if it, for any reason, stops us from filling our actual need of a top 6 RW.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 10:16 AM   #140
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
He isn't that slow. Watch some of his games.
He is most definitely not a quick player.

In my view, he has lost speed since he played with the Flames.

Which is normal considering he is turning 40 in July.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bringhomejarome , gaudreau to iginla , iggy iggy iggy , oi oi oi! , yeah baby!


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy