Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2017, 10:14 AM   #121
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Cold, man. Cold.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 10:39 AM   #122
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Wish Gaudreau had a better game but that was a great showing
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 10:53 AM   #123
Har-Calgary
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SixPoundBurrito View Post
Wish Gaudreau had a better game but that was a great showing
He played pretty well! Drew some penalties with his nifty skating, had some nice feeds that didn't end up in the back of the net but were grade A chances, one was a beauty where Mony almost got his first hatty. Johnny didn't fill up the stat sheet but he was a force. The whole team was! Chaisson had a strong game too, that line with him, Steeg and Bennett was great. I thought Versteeg was quietly one of the best players on the ice.

Somewhat ironic that the only line that didn't score was the 3M line but they still played well.
Har-Calgary is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Har-Calgary For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2017, 10:59 AM   #124
FacePaint
Powerplay Quarterback
 
FacePaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

Anyone figure out what the unsportsmanlike conduct penalty was for?
__________________
FacePaint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:06 AM   #125
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FacePaint View Post
Anyone figure out what the unsportsmanlike conduct penalty was for?
I actually had to look a little bit but I found video of it.

Spoiler!
Hockeyguy15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:14 AM   #126
Galakanokis
#1 Goaltender
 
Galakanokis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sadly not in the Dome.
Exp:
Default

Most comfortable I have been all year watching Elliot in net. You just got the sense that he wasn't going to crumble after a crappy goal. Plus the team kept there foot down and stayed aggressive. Amazing what playing with confidence can do fr you.
Galakanokis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:34 AM   #127
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl View Post
Doubt it. I don't think anybody would want Wideman given he's got nothing left to offer at an NHL level anymore, oh, and his god damned NMC.

Don't get your hopes up for that happening or you guys will likely end up being disappointed even if Wideman's play is disappointing in of itself.

Just ride him out and hope that we (or anybody else) don't offer him another NHL contract.
Actually given the demand (no defensemen available with expansion draft chaos, and only two teams acting as sellers) I think he may actually fetch a 2nd round pick.

However, the Flames don't really have a replacement for him either, so they really can't make that move if they're in the hunt.

The stones on Treliving if he does it though?

Would love to see all of the UFAs assigned sell value by the team and head into the deadline with an open mind. If someone comes up to it, let them go, if not keep them and make the playoffs.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:40 AM   #128
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl View Post
Doubt it. I don't think anybody would want Wideman given he's got nothing left to offer at an NHL level anymore, oh, and his god damned NMC.

Don't get your hopes up for that happening or you guys will likely end up being disappointed even if Wideman's play is disappointing in of itself.

Just ride him out and hope that we (or anybody else) don't offer him another NHL contract.
No way man, I'm holding out hope for Wideman for a 7th!
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:40 AM   #129
mennoknight
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Actually given the demand (no defensemen available with expansion draft chaos, and only two teams acting as sellers) I think he may actually fetch a 2nd round pick.

However, the Flames don't really have a replacement for him either, so they really can't make that move if they're in the hunt.

The stones on Treliving if he does it though?

Would love to see all of the UFAs assigned sell value by the team and head into the deadline with an open mind. If someone comes up to it, let them go, if not keep them and make the playoffs.
This is a weird argument to me. There's nobody to replace Wideman? He's so bad. I would be happy with Wotherspoon or Kulak or hell, Kylington taking all his minutes.
__________________
robyn regehr is brazilian
mennoknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:44 AM   #130
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mennoknight View Post
This is a weird argument to me. There's nobody to replace Wideman? He's so bad. I would be happy with Wotherspoon or Kulak or hell, Kylington taking all his minutes.
I think he's a weak link in the upper half of the roster (top 9 forwards, top 4 defenseman, top goaltender), but that's not to say there is anyone ready to actually best him.

It's worth trying Kulak though. But that means all Jyrki all the time, which has been a bit of an adventure too.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:47 AM   #131
Monahan For Mayor
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Probably the thing that excites me the most about last night, Sam Bennett looked like a hockey player again.
Monahan For Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 11:53 AM   #132
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Actually given the demand (no defensemen available with expansion draft chaos, and only two teams acting as sellers) I think he may actually fetch a 2nd round pick.

However, the Flames don't really have a replacement for him either, so they really can't make that move if they're in the hunt.

The stones on Treliving if he does it though?

Would love to see all of the UFAs assigned sell value by the team and head into the deadline with an open mind. If someone comes up to it, let them go, if not keep them and make the playoffs.
I agree with the poster above, this is a strange argument. How can the Flames expect anyone to step in and replace a guy like Wideman if they're not given the opportunity to do so? Specifically because Wideman is given all sorts of minutes he doesn't deserve.

The reality is this team is still rebuilding. I don't understand the appeal of a rebuilding team overplaying a depreciating asset like Wideman, who besides not being any more of a current #4 defenseman as any other player in the organization, almost certainly does not figure into this team's picture a few months from now. A player like Kulak could conceivably one day develop into a cost-controlled second pairing guy if given more of an opportunity, but we'll never know unless the coach actually sticks with one of these players past a few games. Almost certainly anyone put in that #4 spot will struggle to keep up, so it might as well be someone who can learn and develop through the experience.

The chances of anyone in the AHL stepping straight into the second pairing are extremely slim, and this is one area where I think Brad and GG are being a bit too conservative. Playoffs are great and all but even if the Flames make it, they won't get far. Use these years to develop players properly, not bury them in the minors so that you can maybe showcase a bum like Wideman for a 3rd round pick or whatever.

Last edited by mrdonkey; 02-02-2017 at 11:55 AM.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mrdonkey For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2017, 12:11 PM   #133
csnarpy
First Line Centre
 
csnarpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Locked in the Trunk of a Car
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FacePaint View Post
Anyone figure out what the unsportsmanlike conduct penalty was for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15 View Post
I actually had to look a little bit but I found video of it.

Best post!!

Thanks for that, almost spewed my coffee all over me!

Last edited by csnarpy; 02-02-2017 at 12:13 PM.
csnarpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 12:22 PM   #134
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Actually given the demand (no defensemen available with expansion draft chaos, and only two teams acting as sellers) I think he may actually fetch a 2nd round pick.

However, the Flames don't really have a replacement for him either, so they really can't make that move if they're in the hunt.

The stones on Treliving if he does it though?

Would love to see all of the UFAs assigned sell value by the team and head into the deadline with an open mind. If someone comes up to it, let them go, if not keep them and make the playoffs.
IMO it would take far bigger stones to turn down a 2nd round pick for Wideman. I don't believe he's that hard to replace, but I also don't believe his market value is that high. Not sure they will be able to move him at all.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 12:25 PM   #135
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Wideman is very hard to replace. Hard to find someone who turns the puck over as much as him and is as slow as him.

Don't see how anyone can be even worse than him. All they have to do is play slightly above average defensively while adding nothing offensively and they're an upgrade on Wideman.

A 2nd for Wideman would be a miracle. Don't expect anyone to even want him but if anyone did I doubt it's anything more than a 4th with us retaining salary.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 12:25 PM   #136
Funkhouser
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Funkhouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
Exp:
Default

Guaranteed if Wideman was on waivers there would be crickets
Funkhouser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 12:47 PM   #137
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl View Post
Doubt it. I don't think anybody would want Wideman given he's got nothing left to offer at an NHL level anymore, oh, and his god damned NMC.

Don't get your hopes up for that happening or you guys will likely end up being disappointed even if Wideman's play is disappointing in of itself.

Just ride him out and hope that we (or anybody else) don't offer him another NHL contract.
I've been thinking that Treliving has given instructions to GG to play Wideman as a top 4 for the purpose of showcasing him which is why he's been paired with Brodie for 2/3 of the season.

I think GG realized recently that he is only hurting himself by doing this and switched to the Brodie/Engelland pairing which he actually praised back in the pre-season when discussing how effective they were against the Canucks in the playoffs.

It just makes no sense that they have been playing Wideman so much. Brodie hasn't been great and he should blame himself first, but when I watch him, I get the sense that he does not have much confidence in this partner. Brodie makes very uncharacteristic and high risk decisions that he would not do if he trusted Wideman.

I'm hoping that once the trade deadline comes and goes, that whether they find a taker for Wideman or not, he is no longer in the top 6 for the Flames. Sit him as the 7th or ask him to go down to the AHL to work on his game and showcase himself for another contract next season with another team.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 12:48 PM   #138
Karl
Franchise Player
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Actually given the demand (no defensemen available with expansion draft chaos, and only two teams acting as sellers) I think he may actually fetch a 2nd round pick.

However, the Flames don't really have a replacement for him either, so they really can't make that move if they're in the hunt.

The stones on Treliving if he does it though?

Would love to see all of the UFAs assigned sell value by the team and head into the deadline with an open mind. If someone comes up to it, let them go, if not keep them and make the playoffs.
Regarding the bolded part. What??? With all due respect, that seems far fetched to me at best. Way too far fetched.

I mean, why would (or should) anyone want to give us a 2nd rounder for a guy who looks done, unless we're talking about a GM taking stupid pills or living in the past and thinking Wideman's still more than what he is right now?? Try more like a 5th or 6th rounder, if that.

Wideman has about as much NHL game left as David Jones at this point and Jones is nowhere to be seen in any league anywhere as we speak. I'll be shocked if Wideman gets anything more than a PTO and survives that.

I'd say it's way more likely Wideman ends up like Jones next year than getting a 2nd round pick at the TDL.

Last edited by Karl; 02-02-2017 at 12:50 PM.
Karl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 12:52 PM   #139
Galakanokis
#1 Goaltender
 
Galakanokis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sadly not in the Dome.
Exp:
Default

I am perfectly fine with Engelland moving up with Brodie and riding the crap out of the top 4 for the remainder of the season. Can a Kulak/Wotherspoon - Jokipokka hold down 8 or less a minutes a night?
Galakanokis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2017, 12:54 PM   #140
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galakanokis View Post
I am perfectly fine with Engelland moving up with Brodie and riding the crap out of the top 4 for the remainder of the season. Can a Kulak/Wotherspoon - Jokipokka hold down 8 or less a minutes a night?
How about Kulak with Brodie please.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:52 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy