[GT] Flames vs. Ducks Dec. 29

[btimbit]

Hm. That could go either way

[Monahan For Mayor]

That's a goal

[FireGilbert]

I don't think that will be overturned. Wouldn't have counted in the crease rule era though.

[GioforPM]

Challenge gonna fail I think.

[calgaryblood]

That should count. But who knows.

[direwolf]

Interesting challenge by Gulutzan. Definitely looked like Johnson was interfered with there. This could go either way.

[btimbit]

Perry definitely interferes but to me it looks like it was already going in anyway

[GioforPM]

Tough save but Johnson a little slow to react and Engelland had no idea where the puck was.

[dash_pinched]

Perry's leg was in between Johnson's pads and he did give him a shove - Could go either way.

[Jacks]

Perry has such a punchable face

[calgaryblood]

Actually this might be one of those goals that'll infuriate the Ducks fanbase. Hopefully it goes our way.

[dieHARDflameZ]

Originally Posted by btimbit

Perry definitely interferes but to me it looks like it was already going in anyway

That's the thing. He was definitely interfered with but that pucks going in no matter what. So what's the rule state?

[Yamer]

To me it looks like he interfered with him completely unprovoked. I think they should call it back.

[You Need a Thneed]

Worth the challenge, but I don't know if it will be overturned.

[PugnaciousIntern]

I thought initially it was interference, but on replay clearly should be a goal in my opinion

[Your Calgary Flames!]

It not Perrys arm. It's his leg being in the pads.

[Karl]

I think this should count. I'd be pissed if the red team had that type of goal overturned.

[FireGilbert]

I hope one day Ducks fans learn to hate Tkachuk as much as I hate Perry.

[Karl]

Yep. That's the right call.

[dieHARDflameZ]

Typical. Shoe on the other foot and that's a no goal guaranteed.