Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2017, 03:40 PM   #121
Anduril
Franchise Player
 
Anduril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
He's a UFA, they can sign him and then they still get to select another one of our unprotected players.
Not if they sign him before the expansion draft in the 48hr window.

http://www.tsn.ca/concerns-about-nhl...merge-1.609388

Quote:
Specifically, GMs worry that Vegas could take advantage of the 48-hour window before the expansion draft in June to quietly agree to terms on a deal with a pending unrestricted free agent, then wait until July 1 to sign him, so as to pluck another player off a team's roster in the expansion draft.
This would circumvent the rule that if a team loses a free agent to Vegas in that 48-hour free-agent-signing window, it cannot lose another player in the expansion draft. Some GMs worry that veteran GM George McPhee, who wasn't born yesterday, would take advantage of the situation.
Anduril is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Anduril For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:45 PM   #122
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Not too worried about Stone signing with LV anyway. He wants to be in Calgary.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 03:46 PM   #123
Nsd1
#1 Goaltender
 
Nsd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Kulak and Shinkaruk are the only exposed players I would be mildly interested in if I were the Knights.
Nsd1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nsd1 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:47 PM   #124
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Ferland is the 6th forward, not Brouwer.

The 7th spot will be interesting. If Lazar performs down the stretch here, he'll get the slot. Brouwer can likely be exposed without issue as I'd guess it's fairly unlikely that VGK wants to take on the contract.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 03:50 PM   #125
Swayze11
something else haha
 
Swayze11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Yea I think you protect Lazar and Ferland and expose Brouwer.
__________________

Swayze11 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Swayze11 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:51 PM   #126
Lanny'sDaMan
Franchise Player
 
Lanny'sDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nachodamus.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Ferland is the 6th forward, not Brouwer.

The 7th spot will be interesting. If Lazar performs down the stretch here, he'll get the slot. Brouwer can likely be exposed without issue as I'd guess it's fairly unlikely that VGK wants to take on the contract.
I keep seeing people say this but I also see a lot of people talking about how the Knights have to also hit the cap floor which might possibly make him a touch more palatable from their perspective.
Lanny'sDaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 03:54 PM   #127
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Ferland is the 6th forward, not Brouwer.

The 7th spot will be interesting. If Lazar performs down the stretch here, he'll get the slot. Brouwer can likely be exposed without issue as I'd guess it's fairly unlikely that VGK wants to take on the contract.


They need to reach the cap floor so they will be selecting some players with less than desirable contracts. That said, since Brouwer was building a home in Calgary prior to free agency, its obvious he wants to be here and it would reflect poorly on the team to expose a player one year after signing him as a UFA. I think Tre sends LV either a mid-round pick or B prospect to not select Ferland, Brouwer or Lazar.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MisterJoji For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:54 PM   #128
Otto-matic
Franchise Player
 
Otto-matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

I can't see the Flames exposing Brouwer, it would turn Calgary a UFA blackhole for the team to expose a player 1 year after signing a long term contract.
Otto-matic is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Otto-matic For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:54 PM   #129
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny'sDaMan View Post
I keep seeing people say this but I also see a lot of people talking about how the Knights have to also hit the cap floor which might possibly make him a touch more palatable from their perspective.
That's ok though.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 03:56 PM   #130
Backlunds_socks
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic View Post
I can't see the Flames exposing Brouwer, it would turn Calgary a UFA blackhole for the team to expose a player 1 year after signing a long term contract.
I don't think so, its course of business.
Backlunds_socks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Backlunds_socks For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:57 PM   #131
shadowlord
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Ferland is a bigger lock for protection than Brouwer
Based on the way Ferland has played, I agree.

However, from what I'm hearing in the media, by exposing Brouwer, Treliving would be admitting that the signing was a mistake. So essentially, Brouwer will be protected for Tre's pride.
shadowlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 03:57 PM   #132
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic View Post
I can't see the Flames exposing Brouwer, it would turn Calgary a UFA blackhole for the team to expose a player 1 year after signing a long term contract.
If a player wanted to avoid that situation, he would need to negotiate a NMC. Brouwer either wasn't concerned or didn't have that leverage. It isn't a blackhole, it is business and players know that. Also, expansion drafts don't happen every year.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:57 PM   #133
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic View Post
I can't see the Flames exposing Brouwer, it would turn Calgary a UFA blackhole for the team to expose a player 1 year after signing a long term contract.
I agree... but I don't see the Flames exposing Ferland or Lazar now either.

I think the best course of action will be to trade Vegas an asset, or if they sign Engelland instead.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2017, 03:58 PM   #134
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

I don't think the Flames, if they do decide to expose Brouwer, would be the only team exposing a recently-signed free agent. It's not like they're going out and trading Brouwer, it's an expansion draft so somebody has to go. It's the nature of the business and I would be very surprised if it had any impact at all on Calgary as a FA destination if he were picked up.

That said, I think the odds are better than even that the Flames either break a deal with Vegas or lose Engelland.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 04:01 PM   #135
Backlunds_socks
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Exp:
Default

How many players per team can LV choose to steal?
Backlunds_socks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 04:04 PM   #136
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlunds_socks View Post
How many players per team can LV choose to steal?
One.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 04:07 PM   #137
Backlunds_socks
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
One.
Lazar will not be the chosen one.

Brouwer will be protected.
Backlunds_socks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 04:09 PM   #138
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

The Lazar acquisition definitely muddies the waters. I think the Flames have to consider exposing a veteran like Brouwer or Frolik and then cutting a deal with Vegas to ensure they're not taken. This is assuming that Ferland and Lazar will be protected.

I'm sure Treliving will be talking with McPhee quite a bit leading up to the expansion draft. That should result in the Flames having a very good sense of what kind of cost would be associated with ensuring Vegas skips an exposed player we want to keep.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 04:13 PM   #139
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Since Lazar doesn't have a contract next year, doesn't that mean we don't have to protect him
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2017, 04:22 PM   #140
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
Since Lazar doesn't have a contract next year, doesn't that mean we don't have to protect him
No, it doesn't mean that. RFAs have to be protected if they have enough time spent in the league or as a pro. Which Lazar has.

Last edited by Finger Cookin; 03-01-2017 at 04:25 PM.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy