Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2016, 09:41 AM   #121
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Yes it matters a lot. The CBA exists for a reason. RFA and UFA status are among the most important items to be negotiated. And the reason is because UFAs make more money.

Teams control their budgets with RFAs. Simply throwing that away and saying 'pay him whatever' is how you destroy your franchise's competitiveness.
Paying him accordingly means you pay him what he's worth and not simply 'whatever' as you say. What destroys your teams competitiveness is signing guys like Wideman, Stajan and Hiller to high dollar, multi-year deals deals that you can't move.

Johnny is being outproduced by only a half a dozen players in the league and I find it troubling anyone would suggest that the Flames should approach him with the intention of signing him to say Stastny type money simply because he still has RFA years left.

When you clearly have a generational talent on your team (which I firmly believe he will pan out to be), you lock the talent up. If the Flames cannot manage an 8M dollar hit for a player that deserves it then they don't deserve the player in the first place.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hot_Flatus For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2016, 09:44 AM   #122
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post


I was talking about cap space, and frankly I couldn't give two craps about the Flames actually revenue vs. expense. Even if it were a concern, this is not the contract to nickel and dime on. You would jeopardize the team's long term competitiveness, and therefore potential revenues. But because you've quoted "economists' projections", you're probably right...the Flames should become a cap floor team if/until oil rebounds. Let's just make sure they're the same economists that predicted the decline in oil prices, the housing market crash or the burst of the .com bubble
I will add another . Saying "economists don't agree with you therefore you are wrong" just shows that poster doesn't have much experience in finance/the investment world. Firstly economists are often wrong, there's a reason they're not investors and don't have skin in the game. Secondly even sophisticated investors/companies who do have skin in the game are often wrong. Thirdly you can find economists to confirm whatever bias you have on either said of the argument.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2016, 10:00 AM   #123
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Flames ownership group came out and gave the mandate to management (I think the season Burke took over, but maybe the season prior?) to not nickel and dime a player, and to just pay them what they are worth.

With that being said, if the Flames are going to nickel and dime a contract, this might be the one to do it on. Why? Because it will set the upper-limit relative to all future contracts. The cheaper you get Gaudreau, the cheaper Bennett will probably be, the cheaper the 2016 pick will end up being, and it should have a trickle-down effect.

It will become easier to surround Gaudreau and the rest of the 'core' with legitimate talent anyways.

Now, you don't nickel and dime to the point you make the player feel like he is underappreciated. Last thing the Flames should do is piss off their superstar. I just hope that Gaudreau takes a bit of a discount on a long-term deal. While an 8x8 is in the ballpark of being (+/- .5million), I really hope he signs for 7. Anything below that, and it is a huge bargain for the Flames.

Really curious to see what Monahan signs for as well. Should be relatively close to Gaudreau's contract.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 09:23 AM   #124
Commandant
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

A look at Gaudreau's production, and what type of RFA contract he could be looking at (compared to other recent RFAs of the same age/experience/production).

http://lastwordonsports.com/2016/06/...hnny-gaudreau/
__________________
Your 2018 NHL Draft Headquarters Now Open
http://lastwordonhockey.com/2018-nhl...-headquarters/

New article every day.
Commandant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Commandant For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 10:31 AM   #125
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Intuition leads me to think Johnny takes a slightly below value deal or just average because he wants to win. He's so humble in the interviews, he's so reserved and so loyal to the Flames it seems like he's determined to win here.

The amount of time and dedication he puts into it doesn't seem to be just for money. I bet it will be identical to Monahans.


"In his first two NHL seasons, Kane scored 46 goals and 142 points. Gaudreau’s career marks are 54 goals and 142 points in his first two seasons."
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 10:55 AM   #126
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commandant View Post
A look at Gaudreau's production, and what type of RFA contract he could be looking at (compared to other recent RFAs of the same age/experience/production).

http://lastwordonsports.com/2016/06/...hnny-gaudreau/
Did not know Johnny can't be offer sheeted. That's an interesting wrinkle.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 11:17 AM   #127
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
The Calgary Flames are coming off a disappointing season, falling to 25th in the NHL standings a year after making the Stanley Cup Playoffs and advancing to the second round. Their biggest weakness this season was goaltending, but their most important task this offseason is to sign top scoring forward Johnny Gaudreau to a new contract.
http://lastwordonsports.com/2016/06/...ohnny-gaudreau

Quote:
The Calgary Flames are coming off a disappointing season, falling to 25th in the National Hockey League standings a year after advancing to the second round in the playoffs. Their biggest weakness this season was goaltending, but their most important task this off-season is to sign Sean Monahan to a new contract.
http://lastwordonsports.com/2016/06/...n-sean-monahan

This is almost exactly how I used to do essays in grade 7.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 11:56 AM   #128
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

That's not even correct. The Flames finished 26th.

They must have just looked that the Flames were picking 6th overall and assumed we finished 6th last.

Not a big deal but shows that they are lazy
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 02:13 PM   #129
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

Despite the nitpicks above, I enjoyed the read. Thanks for sharing.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 02:15 PM   #130
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
In Conclusion...
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 02:37 PM   #131
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
In Conclusion...
Webster's dictionary defines....
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 03:04 PM   #132
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

In a world where...
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 03:12 PM   #133
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Starting to think it will be a 5 or 6 year deal tops. Would take him to 28/29 years old as he will be 23 this summer.

Maybe even the same deal Gio got. 6 years, $40.5 million. $6.75 per year.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 03:19 PM   #134
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Starting to think it will be a 5 or 6 year deal tops. Would take him to 28/29 years old as he will be 23 this summer.

Maybe even the same deal Gio got. 6 years, $40.5 million. $6.75 per year.
5 years only buys one UFA year. Either he gets bridged or it is 6-8 years. I worry that he will sign 6 similar to Dougie rather than the full 8. Again I am one of those people that thinks Gaudreau will eventually head East for the second half of his career
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 03:31 PM   #135
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Yeah I'll be surprised if he signs another contract in Calgary after this one. Seems to have so much connection to the east.

He needs to marry a Calgarian asap. Fathers sacrifice your daughters.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 03:42 PM   #136
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

If he wants to play his 30s in the East that's fine with me as long as we get him in his prime. Let someone else pay for past glory.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 03:44 PM   #137
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

If he wants to go back home after he wins a cup with the Flames, I am ok with that. Prior thereto, I am not ok with that.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 03:58 PM   #138
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Yeah I'll be surprised if he signs another contract in Calgary after this one. Seems to have so much connection to the east.

He needs to marry a Calgarian asap. Fathers sacrifice your daughters.
A real huge sacrifice to marry your daughter to a humble, polite, educated, super rich professional athlete haha.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 04:30 PM   #139
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
5 years only buys one UFA year. Either he gets bridged or it is 6-8 years. I worry that he will sign 6 similar to Dougie rather than the full 8. Again I am one of those people that thinks Gaudreau will eventually head East for the second half of his career
Agreed. 6 it is then I bet. Wouldn't be surprised if it's ridiculously similar to the Gio deal. I'm hoping for 8, but something tells me the Flames management will be wary of handing out any deals longer than 6 years, and Johnny won't want to sign until he's 30/31, which I can't blame him.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 01:39 AM   #140
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

This thread got kind of depressing. Hopefully Gaudreau plays his entire career with the Flames as he is a unique and rare talent that doesn't come around often.

If he must move, hope the GM of the Flames squeezes whatever team out east for a deal completely tilted in favor of the Flames.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy