Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2014, 09:34 AM   #121
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
You know what they say, if you gotta ask...

I think they are around $600 though.
Looks like it could contain a suitcase nuke.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 09:40 AM   #122
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
I don't feel sorry for the frontline airline personnel AT ALL here. Your company changed all the allowances, and you're the face of the company. Of course you're going to bear the brunt of it when people lose their minds.
Wow.
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 09:41 AM   #123
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
I don't feel sorry for the frontline airline personnel AT ALL here. Your company changed all the allowances, and you're the face of the company. Of course you're going to bear the brunt of it when people lose their minds.

Dion's quote summed it up beautifully

Sid Cupido · Top Commenter
and this behavior is a surprise to the airlines? They insist on treating their passengers like penned cattle and when those same passengers react like animals the airlines are mystified? How idiotic are they?


I will continue to push my baggage limits when I have to, and if I get questioned by passengers I will gladly refer them to the flight attendant. The airlines created this problem, they can deal with it.
I still feel sorry for the front line staff. Sure the companies have made a mess of things and created this, but the poor employees have to take the brunt of that stupidity. It sucks when you have to deal with the mess that someone else created.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 10-01-2014, 09:51 AM   #124
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
I don't feel sorry for the frontline airline personnel AT ALL here. Your company changed all the allowances, and you're the face of the company. Of course you're going to bear the brunt of it when people lose their minds.

Dion's quote summed it up beautifully

Sid Cupido · Top Commenter
and this behavior is a surprise to the airlines? They insist on treating their passengers like penned cattle and when those same passengers react like animals the airlines are mystified? How idiotic are they?

I will continue to push my baggage limits when I have to, and if I get questioned by passengers I will gladly refer them to the flight attendant. The airlines created this problem, they can deal with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
I still feel sorry for the front line staff. Sure the companies have made a mess of things and created this, but the poor employees have to take the brunt of that stupidity. It sucks when you have to deal with the mess that someone else created.
Agreed, I suspect that there was zero discussion with the front line staff prior to this decision. Yelling at the front line airline staff is the same as yelling at the gas jocky that fills your tank or the 7/11 employee that sells you your over priced chips/pop/bottled water. It is useless and stupid.

If you are truely disgusted by the decision then contact the airline by mail/email and express your views (no I don't believe it will make anymore difference than yelling at the front end staff), but it might get it infront of the correct people.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 10-01-2014, 10:10 AM   #125
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
Wow.
"Wow" what?

I work for a private company, and I'm on the front line as well. When things go sideways, I get all kinds of grief from clients; likely 10x what an airline attendant would EVER get.

Ever hear the expression "shoot the messenger"? When airlines create an environment when you can't call anyone, you can't talk to anyone, and treat you like a number with a wallet, you're going to reap what you sow. Flying can be pretty frustrating to the layman that only does it once a year, so when you get nailed with "surcharges" and someone loses their mind over it I don't feel sorry for the airline employees.

Should we all spare them the grief because "Corporate" came up with these ridiculous rules, and it's not their responsibility? Because to me that's a poor excuse.

Besides, at Westjet, "we're all owners"
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 10:11 AM   #126
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
"Wow" what?

I work for a private company, and I'm on the front line as well. When things go sideways, I get all kinds of grief from clients; likely 10x what an airline attendant would EVER get.

Ever hear the expression "shoot the messenger"? When airlines create an environment when you can't call anyone, you can't talk to anyone, and treat you like a number with a wallet, you're going to reap what you sow. Flying can be pretty frustrating to the layman that only does it once a year, so when you get nailed with "surcharges" and someone loses their mind over it I don't feel sorry for the airline employees.

Should we all spare them the grief because "Corporate" came up with these ridiculous rules, and it's not their responsibility? Because to me that's a poor excuse.

Besides, at Westjet, "we're all owners"
ermm I believe the expression is "don't shoot the messenger".
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 10-01-2014, 10:19 AM   #127
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Not in my industry!

We always joke about it. If you're the messenger and the news is bad, you deserve to get shot.

Moral of the story: be prepared to deal with bad news, or don't BE the messenger.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 10:26 AM   #128
calgarygringo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Exp:
Default Enforce the size

The biggest challenge is the fact that they have always had the bag size rule there they have just never enforced it. It is now coming to bite them in the back side for not using those bag size checks before even though they have been there for years just looking like a dust collector.
As a regular business traveler I would hope they do check people bag sizes and they do send the big ones to the baggage compartment. Too many times I have a carry on with my electronics etc. and someone tried to jam a full sized suitcase in the bin almost destroying what we have in there.
I also am waiting for the day some guys big bag drops out of a bin on some old person and kills them and the family brings a big lawsuit for it. maybe then they will learn that carry on means just that and if you want to bring your whole closet pay the money and ship it down below.
calgarygringo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 10:31 AM   #129
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
Not in my industry!

We always joke about it. If you're the messenger and the news is bad, you deserve to get shot.

Moral of the story: be prepared to deal with bad news, or don't BE the messenger.


Your industry sounds dumb.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 10:36 AM   #130
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
"Wow" what?

I work for a private company, and I'm on the front line as well. When things go sideways, I get all kinds of grief from clients; likely 10x what an airline attendant would EVER get.

Ever hear the expression "shoot the messenger"? When airlines create an environment when you can't call anyone, you can't talk to anyone, and treat you like a number with a wallet, you're going to reap what you sow. Flying can be pretty frustrating to the layman that only does it once a year, so when you get nailed with "surcharges" and someone loses their mind over it I don't feel sorry for the airline employees.

Should we all spare them the grief because "Corporate" came up with these ridiculous rules, and it's not their responsibility? Because to me that's a poor excuse.

Besides, at Westjet, "we're all owners"
Well here's the thing: that guy you berate on the front-lines didn't sow anything. He just happens to work for the airline and has to comply with their policies or find himself out of work.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 10:52 AM   #131
Regular_John
First Line Centre
 
Regular_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This is really going to come to a head when it's -40 and everyone is looking to pitch their giant Canada Goose parkas into the bins along side all the carry on luggage and laptop bags.
Regular_John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 10:58 AM   #132
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Well here's the thing: that guy you berate on the front-lines didn't sow anything. He just happens to work for the airline and has to comply with their policies or find himself out of work.
No different than anyone else with a job. If I get upset at the amount of grief I get I can always find a way to deal with it (talk to my employer, quit, etc etc).

I should point out I fly 50-60 segments a year, and I don't berate anyone, ever. I prepare myself properly and know EXACTLY what to expect from check in to departure.

My whole point is that I don't feel sorry for the airline employees when someone gets upset because of the rules the airline imposes. I don't blame the passenger who has a questionable carry on, I blame the airline for creating the situation. I get mad at the airline for creating longer lineups while they "police" the carry on size. I get mad at the airline when my flight gets delayed because there is no overhead space. I get mad at the airline when I see a mom struggle with a stroller, carry-ons, and kids trying to get it all on board because the luggage fees are outrageous.

IMO people need to focus on who is creating the problem, and it's not the passengers. We're all trying to work within the "rules", and when it causes issues I blame the airlines. That includes the flight attendants. Sorry, but they work there too.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 11:02 AM   #133
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
I will continue to push my baggage limits when I have to, and if I get questioned by passengers I will gladly refer them to the flight attendant. The airlines created this problem, they can deal with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
No different than anyone else with a job. If I get upset at the amount of grief I get I can always find a way to deal with it (talk to my employer, quit, etc etc).

I should point out I fly 50-60 segments a year, and I don't berate anyone, ever. I prepare myself properly and know EXACTLY what to expect from check in to departure.

My whole point is that I don't feel sorry for the airline employees when someone gets upset because of the rules the airline imposes. I don't blame the passenger who has a questionable carry on, I blame the airline for creating the situation. I get mad at the airline for creating longer lineups while they "police" the carry on size. I get mad at the airline when my flight gets delayed because there is no overhead space. I get mad at the airline when I see a mom struggle with a stroller, carry-ons, and kids trying to get it all on board because the luggage fees are outrageous.

IMO people need to focus on who is creating the problem, and it's not the passengers. We're all trying to work within the "rules", and when it causes issues I blame the airlines. That includes the flight attendants. Sorry, but they work there too.

Tron it doesn't sound like you are trying to work within the rules.

Also, FYI strollers are gate checked, ie: you leave them at the entrance to the plane and they are they when you exit the plane.

I agree that people need to "focus on who is creating the problem"....FYI it ain't the front line staff.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 11:14 AM   #134
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
Tron it doesn't sound like you are trying to work within the rules.

Also, FYI strollers are gate checked, ie: you leave them at the entrance to the plane and they are they when you exit the plane.

I agree that people need to "focus on who is creating the problem"....FYI it ain't the front line staff.
I absolutely do. I have a hard case (3D camera that fits the first carry on size) and a backpack for my laptop and clothes, that can be squished to fit the second personal item.

Thanks, I understand strollers are gate checked. But mom also has carry ons because she can't afford checked luggage fees. So not only is she pushing a stroller, she has wheel bags. I see this all the time.

You are correct, the front line staff aren't creating the problem, but as a representative of the airline they get to deal with it. Sorry.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 11:32 AM   #135
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tron_fdc View Post
I absolutely do. I have a hard case (3D camera that fits the first carry on size) and a backpack for my laptop and clothes, that can be squished to fit the second personal item.

Thanks, I understand strollers are gate checked. But mom also has carry ons because she can't afford checked luggage fees. So not only is she pushing a stroller, she has wheel bags. I see this all the time.

You are correct, the front line staff aren't creating the problem, but as a representative of the airline they get to deal with it. Sorry.

I am not saying I don't agree with your frustations, but honestly directing them at the front line staff is missplaced.

If you want create change then point your efforts in the right directions. In fact, I would suggest you say to the front line staff "I don't agree with your company's decision. Who do I contact to complain?"

BTW, mom's don't have a carry on because they can't afford luggage fees, it is because young kids (ones that need strollers) generally need diapers/food/toys/books/change of clothes/blankee or teddy....an so on....
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 04:24 PM   #136
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
I am not saying I don't agree with your frustations, but honestly directing them at the front line staff is missplaced.

If you want create change then point your efforts in the right directions. In fact, I would suggest you say to the front line staff "I don't agree with your company's decision. Who do I contact to complain?"

BTW, mom's don't have a carry on because they can't afford luggage fees, it is because young kids (ones that need strollers) generally need diapers/food/toys/books/change of clothes/blankee or teddy....an so on....
I think you're missing what I'm saying. If you read through my posts I never said I give it to front line staff, ever (I barely interact with them). I may blame the airlines for a lot of issues, but I'm always courteous and patient, because I understand the rules. They can charge $500/bag for all I care, I will work around it, and still have a (mostly) pleasurable experience.

I HAVE said that when other people do it, I don't show a lot of sympathy.

That's also a pretty sweeping generalization on what a mom is doing on a plane BTW. I have no idea what she's doing or why (neither do you) but what I DO know is they require a lot of space, and usually have a ton of baggage. Would that decrease with a reduction in bag fees? Maybe. Probably. But that's my opinion and I can't substantiate it (neither can you) but like I said, I fly a TON, and it's based on my observations.

The argument I'm making here is that boarding times would decrease, bin space would increase, and the average traveler would have a better experience if they got rid of bag fees. But when the average traveler gets mad at airline staff because of it, my opinion is have at 'er.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 06:05 PM   #137
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Berating a flight attendant about baggage allowance is like yelling at the cashier at Esso about the price of gas. Take it up with someone who is responsible for it and/or can do something about it.

I'm not saying you berate front line staff (you've said many times that you don't), but I don't hold people guilty by association because of what their corporate big wigs did. Someone can make a formal complaint if they'd like, but venting at the flights attendants accomplishes nothing at all for anyone.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 07:07 PM   #138
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

The thing is though, what will get noticed? Raging at frontline staff and their response to it, or a letter writing campaign to the heads of Air Canada and Westjet? Maybe this isn't the nicest tactic to try to achieve results, but is the other route really going to be any more fruitful?
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 07:51 PM   #139
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
The thing is though, what will get noticed? Raging at frontline staff and their response to it, or a letter writing campaign to the heads of Air Canada and Westjet? Maybe this isn't the nicest tactic to try to achieve results, but is the other route really going to be any more fruitful?
That's the thing. No amount of letter writing, flight-attendant raging, or moaning, etc. is going to change the policy. Both airlines know that the alternatives to air travel are dreadful or non-existent, and they don't have any competitors to challenge them, so everyone is going to have to deal with it. Which makes venting at front line staff even more unnecessary.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 08:02 PM   #140
Ryan Coke
#1 Goaltender
 
Ryan Coke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

I still say it isn't the lack of competition, it IS the competition that created this. If an airline like allegiant draws people across the border with cheap base fares then charges for everything else, that is what spawned this idea. If consumers had only used the airlines that kept free bags, and paid extra for that being included, then it would have stayed the way it was. But in many cases people voted by buying fares at airlines who had brought in the less inclusive pricing.

Again, I don't like it. But there are reasons this has come to be, and it is not lack of competition. Quite the opposite in many ways.
Ryan Coke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy