Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-20-2013, 03:58 PM   #121
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Elite teams win championships... Period.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 04:12 PM   #122
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Elite teams win championships... Period.
Thanks for the definition Webster
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 04:14 PM   #123
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Thanks for the definition Webster


Celebrity Flames Fan!
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2013, 04:40 PM   #124
Beatle17
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
^^ Exactly.

President Trophies don't make you elite... Stanley Cups do.
So then Carolina is an elite team since the lockout?
Beatle17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 04:49 PM   #125
Burner
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Burner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: winnipeg
Exp:
Default

all i have to say about the topic of this thread is

Get used to it Kesler
Burner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 04:49 PM   #126
strombad
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatle17 View Post
So then Carolina is an elite team since the lockout?
It takes a mixture, but winning a cup is part of it. Anaheim, Carolina, Tampa Bay, LA. None of those teams are elite. Nor were they the year they won the cup. It is for the exact same reason that both Carolina and Vancouver are not elite teams: the inability to dominate the game in all situations. Carolina had a great playoff run that ended up in a championship after an average season, they fell off the next season. Vancouver has had great seasons but never been able to finish.

Elite teams win championships, but winning a championship is not the automatic thing that makes the team elite. It's the last piece that shows the team truly is elite, that they have put everything together and are able to beat every team in the league on their best days. Vancouver can't say they're able to do that.

But, to be fair, if you think Vancouver is elite, then yes, Carolina would be elite by that logic as well.
strombad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 04:54 PM   #127
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
Only 1 team in the league (Pittsburgh) has more wins over the last 5 seasons than Vancouver. If that's not elite (at least in terms of regular season success), then what is?

Thanks D. Sutter, do they also have the most 20 goal scorers on the team?
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 04:55 PM   #128
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

In a 30 team league where dynasties no longer exist what defines an elite team? How is LA who won in 2012 and made it to the 3rd round in 2013 with a core still on their 20's not elite by today's standards?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2013, 09:31 AM   #129
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
How is LA who won in 2012 and made it to the 3rd round in 2013 with a core still on their 20's not elite by today's standards?
They're not elite because the year they won it all, they were a #8 seed that could easily have missed the playoffs. They were one spot ahead of the Flames, who were not an elite team in anybody's books. The next year they were a #5 seed, but still only 4 points away from missing the playoffs.

Elite teams don't worry about missing the postseason.

I put the 2012 Kings in the category of Cinderella teams, with the likes of the '99 Sabres, '03 Ducks, '04 Flames, and '06 Hurricanes and Oilers. It's very rare for a team in that class to win the Stanley Cup. Full credit to the Kings for doing it — but they were still Cinderella. They just managed to clinch it before Jonathan Quick turned back into a pumpkin.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

Last edited by Jay Random; 09-21-2013 at 09:35 AM.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 09-21-2013, 10:56 AM   #130
Mike F
Franchise Player
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Djibouti
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
I put the 2012 Kings in the category of Cinderella teams, with the likes of the '99 Sabres, '03 Ducks, '04 Flames, and '06 Hurricanes and Oilers. It's very rare for a team in that class to win the Stanley Cup. Full credit to the Kings for doing it — but they were still Cinderella. They just managed to clinch it before Jonathan Quick turned back into a pumpkin.
I disagree about the Kings being a Cinderella team in 2012. After Sutter took over as coach, they were 24-13-9, which would translate to a 101 point season over 82 games. They then went 16-4 in the playoffs. Borderline teams don't catch fire at that level for that long
Mike F is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike F For This Useful Post:
Old 09-21-2013, 01:53 PM   #131
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Kesler is an elite crybaby. The Canucks are elite divers.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DuffMan For This Useful Post:
Old 09-22-2013, 01:50 AM   #132
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F View Post
I disagree about the Kings being a Cinderella team in 2012. After Sutter took over as coach, they were 24-13-9, which would translate to a 101 point season over 82 games. They then went 16-4 in the playoffs. Borderline teams don't catch fire at that level for that long
It was Jonathan Quick who mostly caught fire. When a goalie gets that hot, you could put him on almost any team and they would go deep in the playoffs.

By the way, 24-13-9 is still 24 wins and 22 losses, which is hardly a world-beating record.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2013, 01:03 AM   #133
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
It was Jonathan Quick who mostly caught fire. When a goalie gets that hot, you could put him on almost any team and they would go deep in the playoffs...
I might agree with you if the Kings had not now managed to do it two years in a row. Getting to the third round in the playoffs in back-to-back years is a rare feat these days, and something that I would say only elite teams are capable to do.

Since the 2005–06 season:

· The Ducks have done it once (2005–07)
· The Blackhawks have done it once (2008–10)
· The Wings have done it once (2006–08)
· The Penguins have done it once (2007–09)
· The Sharks have done it once (2009–11)

No team has managed it three years straight, and of the above list of six teams, only one of those failed to win a championship. Of these teams, only the Kings have managed to return to the Conference Finals the year AFTER having won the Cup.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 07:30 AM   #134
BlackWallStreet
Scoring Winger
 
BlackWallStreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

I'd say they were elite during that Stanley cup run then they went and got
Guys like kassian... Lol
BlackWallStreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 10:16 AM   #135
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Who cares if they were an elite pre-season, regular season team. They are never winning a SC and that is what is important here.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 05:30 PM   #136
Pontine
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

As much as I hate the Canucks, they were at least an elite Regular season team.
Pontine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy