Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2013, 01:12 PM   #121
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Rumor from HF that the Flames (along with the Blues, Habs, Wild, Kings and Pens) interviewed Laurent Dauphin

Ranked 28th NA skater by Central Scouting. 6'0'' 166lb center.

Lastwordonsports profile:
http://lastwordonsports.com/2013/05/...ct-profile-43/
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2013, 01:37 PM   #122
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Rumor from HF that the Flames (along with the Blues, Habs, Wild, Kings and Pens) interviewed Laurent Dauphin

Ranked 28th NA skater by Central Scouting. 6'0'' 166lb center.

Lastwordonsports profile:
http://lastwordonsports.com/2013/05/...ct-profile-43/

Wouldn't basically all the teams interview all the players in the concensus top 60?

How can you tell who will be available when you pick or even what picks you might have if you are trading up or down?

If on Draft day the Flames are liable to get a 2nd or 3rd round pick for Tanguay or Stempniak or Stajan..... You sure would want to know as much as you can about the guys that are available at that pick.

You are making multi-million dollar decisions here and your scouting staff, psychological analysis and data gathering is really really cheap in comparison.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 01:43 PM   #123
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Wouldn't basically all the teams interview all the players in the concensus top 60?
There is no such thing as a consensus top 60. There are over a 100 players at the draft combine and limited interview time. Teams will interview the players they are most interested in.

For example 28 players interviewed Adam Erne at the combine. Pittsburgh and Dallas decided not to interview him at all even though he is projected to be a 1st round pick.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2013, 01:52 PM   #124
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Much different tone from the GM's in this years draft. I do not recall last year or the year before GM's openly stating that their picks are open for trading. Tallon saying he is open to trading down is something I would never have imagined him saying publicly.

Likely means that this draft is deep and stocking up on extra assets is a good choice for a lot of teams. So maybe the Flames do have a real shot at MacKonnon.
Or Tallon is the new Burke and misses the Chicago spot-light?

Looking at his roster he has a bunch of guys that are too old (or not good enough) to have dumped at the deadline.

3 of Florida's top 4 defensemen (TOI) are Campbell (34), Kuba (36), Weaver (34) who are all locked up for next year. He has Jovanoski (36) signed for 2 more seasons


Brodie plus next year's 1st for Mackinnon? Maybe switch Pittsburgh's 1st for their 2nd (#31)
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 01:56 PM   #125
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
There is no such thing as a consensus top 60. There are over a 100 players at the draft combine and limited interview time. Teams will interview the players they are most interested in.

For example 28 players interviewed Adam Erne at the combine. Pittsburgh and Dallas decided not to interview him at all even though he is projected to be a 1st round pick.
Penguins do not pick until #90. Did they interview anyone that was projected to be a 1st round pick?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 02:11 PM   #126
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
There is no such thing as a consensus top 60. There are over a 100 players at the draft combine and limited interview time. Teams will interview the players they are most interested in.

For example 28 players interviewed Adam Erne at the combine. Pittsburgh and Dallas decided not to interview him at all even though he is projected to be a 1st round pick.
Really? No Time? Limited interview space? If Erne has time to be interviewed by 28 teams it would be reasonable that all the prospects have enough time. That's what they showed up for.

Would NHL teams not have enough staff to conduct interviews? What would their scouts be making a year? Not enough gms, assistant gms, coaches and scouts to do interviews? They couldn't go a hire a group of professional HR consultants at $500/hr for a couple of days to conduct interviews???


Buffalo paid the Flames $3M for a 2nd round pick..... The amount that they ate of Kotaliks contract PLUS got a lop-sided trade of Regehr for Butler, Rammo and Byron.


If the Flames are not prepared...Did not interview them. when someone falls through to their #97 pick that they did not expect to be there then I think I have identified a problem.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 02:34 PM   #127
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Really? No Time? Limited interview space? If Erne has time to be interviewed by 28 teams it would be reasonable that all the prospects have enough time. That's what they showed up for.

Would NHL teams not have enough staff to conduct interviews? What would their scouts be making a year? Not enough gms, assistant gms, coaches and scouts to do interviews? They couldn't go a hire a group of professional HR consultants at $500/hr for a couple of days to conduct interviews???


Buffalo paid the Flames $3M for a 2nd round pick..... The amount that they ate of Kotaliks contract PLUS got a lop-sided trade of Regehr for Butler, Rammo and Byron.


If the Flames are not prepared...Did not interview them. when someone falls through to their #97 pick that they did not expect to be there then I think I have identified a problem.
There are only 2 days to interview 107 prospects at the combine.

How long is a good solid job interview? 30-45 minutes? plus say 5-10 minutes before to prepare a strategy for the interview and another 5-10 minutes after the interview to confer opinions and impressions amongst the interviewers?

Let say 45 minutes total interview time for each prospect times 107 is 4815 minutes or 80 hours of interview time in a 48 hour period.

Splitting up the decision makers on the Flames final list so they can do interviews in parallel is a waste of time. They all need to be in the same interview so they can ask followup questions and get impressions instead of trying to do it 2nd hand at later meetings. It is not like this is the first and only contact the Flames have with these players in the year. The scouts have been talking to the players, coaches, and families through out the year.

Also it is not like they cannot request an interview after the combine is over.

Last edited by sureLoss; 05-31-2013 at 02:37 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2013, 02:48 PM   #128
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
Problem is Ottawa will likely suck bad again this year and that wont help him at all, the flames have no expectations for playoffs so if he's remotely ready he should play.
I would want to see him spend another year in junior.

If Ottawa sucks again next year, I wonder if the Flames would have any sway in getting him traded...

"If you are willing to trade him to a contending team, we will send him down and you can get assets for him. If not, we would rather keep him here than have him on the 67s"

Seems like a reasonable stance from the Flames to me.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 02:49 PM   #129
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Did anyone ever here who it was that the Flames took out to dinner? All we heard before was that it was a European.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 02:51 PM   #130
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Did anyone ever here who it was that the Flames took out to dinner? All we heard before was that it was a European.
Nichushkin i believe.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2013, 03:06 PM   #131
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Aaron Portzline ‏@Aportzline now Russian prospect Valeri Nichushkin declined to answer at least two teams when asked in interviews if he'd play in AHL before NHL debut.

Aaron Portzline ‏@Aportzline 32s Made it pretty clear to media today, however, that the AHL would not be an option for him.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 03:49 PM   #132
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Lazar was interviewed by 26 teams:
Curtis Lazar ‏@CurtisLazar95 30 May All 26 interviews are done, didn't stumble upon many unusual questions. Getting ready for the physical testing tomorrow #NHLcombine
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 03:53 PM   #133
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
Nichushkin i believe.

Could have easily been Barkov or Lindholm. All I heard the Flames confirm is the player was European
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 07:53 PM   #134
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
Nichushkin i believe.
Do you have some reason to think that, or were you just speculating?
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 08:00 PM   #135
Pierre "Monster" McGuire
Franchise Player
 
Pierre "Monster" McGuire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Could have easily been Barkov or Lindholm. All I heard the Flames confirm is the player was European
Technically Russians are Asian...

*nerd snort*
Pierre "Monster" McGuire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 08:20 PM   #136
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire View Post
Technically Russians are Asian...

*nerd snort*
Ummm Pierre, part of Russia is in Europe
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 08:21 PM   #137
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire View Post
Technically Russians are Asian...

*nerd snort*
Isn't that country continentaly separated by the Urals where one third is European and the two thirds asian? Hence Eurasian?

EDIT: Actually you are technically right. Geographically no. But since Moscow is on the Asian continent it is considered Asian.

The more you know!
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 08:22 PM   #138
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire View Post
Technically Russians are Asian...

*nerd snort*
Depends on which side of Chelyabinsk he's from.

*nerd one-up*

(And Moscow is in the European part of Russia.)
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2013, 08:27 PM   #139
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Isn't that country continentaly separated by the Urals where one third is European and the two thirds asian? Hence Eurasian?

EDIT: Actually you are technically right. Geographically no. But since Moscow is on the Asian continent it is considered Asian.

The more you know!
??
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 08:31 PM   #140
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
??
Its a google answer.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy