Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-21-2013, 08:17 PM   #121
Bar-Down
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Bar-Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the 'Dome
Exp:
Default

Tough to watch us climb the standings. Such crappy lucky wins. Jimmy Howard scoring two on himself and so on. We get vastly outshot every game and just score lucky goals.

It will just take longer to rebuild thats all, getting that top 3 pick this year would've been HUGE. But I suppose we have a shot at top picks the next few years.

Connor McDavid in 2015 is definitely an exciting possibility.
__________________
Bar-Down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:17 PM   #122
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Well the good news is not only do we suck at winning when it matters, we also suck at sucking when it matters.

At least we're consistent.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:18 PM   #123
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

TJ Brodie is our #1 defensemen right now. Has been all year, but needed to learn and when Bouwmeester got traded, needed to step up. He has done both.

As for the winning, and as a result getting a lower draft pick.....realize that by winning we are teaching a lot of young players how to play hard to and give it all every shift regardless of whether we make the playoffs or not. The Oilers did exactly the opposite, and their bomb for #1 hasn't exactly worked out any better.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2013, 08:28 PM   #124
JayP
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
The... posters... who seek failure really should engage in a little so-called "intellectual honesty" of their own. This team was never bad enough to finish at the bottom of the league. You got your hopes up for no reason when the team went on an ungodly road losing streak that nobody should have expected could continue indefinitely.

Anyway, I'll now leave the floor to those who ruin every thread with their whining about how we won't get Jones or MacKinnon.
The... posters... who need to get off their high horse about how they can't cheer for a loser should engage in a little so-called "intellectual honesty" of their own. This current team is nowhere near as good as their recent results indicate. You're getting your hopes up for no reason when the team went a on a winning streak that nobody should expect to continue and you should know best - since you're the posters who were ragging on Oilers fans for getting cocky when guys like Gagner/Nilson/Cogliano played great in March/April.

Anyway, I'll now leave the floor to those who ruin every thread with their reminders that 1st overall pick Alexandre Daigle busted and how the Oilers rebuild didn't work and other assorted cherry-picked small sample size data points.
JayP is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to JayP For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2013, 08:30 PM   #125
The Goon
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary...Alberta, Canada
Exp:
Default

Screw the draft pick, I'm calling playoffs!
__________________
We may curse our bad luck that it's sounds like its; who's sounds like whose; they're sounds like their (and there); and you're sounds like your. But if we are grown-ups who have been through full-time education, we have no excuse for muddling them up.
The Goon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:32 PM   #126
RyZ
First Line Centre
 
RyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

I can't remember the last time I saw a team get handled 4-1 at home and have 2 of the 3 star selections. However, this is Minnesota, where Cal Clutterbuck seems to get credited with about 5+ hits every night at home.
RyZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RyZ For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2013, 08:32 PM   #127
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Missed the game, can anyone provide their thoughts on Cundari plz, good and bad. Thanks
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:32 PM   #128
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automaton 3 View Post
Both Detroit and the Wild really needed to win those games. I don't think the Flames were taken all that lightly.

Also - even if the Flames' plan was to tank (man I hope not) what else could they do here? Glencross, Wideman and Tanguay are hurt - they are forced to play youth, who are playing well.
Keep Comeau, keep playing our lazy overpaid vets (Babchuk, Tanguay - why did you get injured, Glencross - see Tanguay, etc etc)

Yay another win. Get on a hot streak after we are eliminated from the playoffs - isnīt that the story as a Flames fan for the most part of the last 15 years? Have to laugh at the condecending posters who look down on people who want a higher pick - they are fans like how Darryl Sutter GMed, just win the next game. Not that Im going to say to lose on purpose, but its funny to they think its some sort of sign that we are gonna be awesome next year. Did you gets get fooled for the better part of the past 15 years too? Anyways, it is what it is - players are taught to compete, and as a Flames fan, you should know we are at our best when there is nothing to lose and we are out of the playoffs.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phanuthier For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2013, 08:33 PM   #129
Gizmo
Backup Goalie
 
Gizmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ricci's Ugly
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
Toronto and Edmonton have been pulling this same thing for years now. Play well when the heat is off just to go back to being a train wreck the season after..

At what point in the last 5 years has Edmonton done this? They've picked 1st overall for 3 years running and have had a top 10 pick for 5 of the last 6 years.
Gizmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:34 PM   #130
Dogbert
First Line Centre
 
Dogbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP View Post
The... posters... who need to get off their high horse about how they can't cheer for a loser should engage in a little so-called "intellectual honesty" of their own. This current team is nowhere near as good as their recent results indicate. You're getting your hopes up for no reason when the team went a on a winning streak that nobody should expect to continue and you should know best - since you're the posters who were ragging on Oilers fans for getting cocky when guys like Gagner/Nilson/Cogliano played great in March/April.

Anyway, I'll now leave the floor to those who ruin every thread with their reminders that 1st overall pick Alexandre Daigle busted and how the Oilers rebuild didn't work and other assorted cherry-picked small sample size data points.
The posters who can't stop harping on how awful it is that we're winning games need to be specific about what it is they want the team to do in order to lose.

The Flames played a more-talented team that needed the win. They started the backup; had next to none of their key players in the lineup; and gave a bunch of rookies and AHLers all the ice time they could want, including 25 minutes to a defenseman playing his first NHL game. They won anyway. What more could they do not to win the game? Tell the players to score on their own net?

Last edited by Dogbert; 04-21-2013 at 08:37 PM.
Dogbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:36 PM   #131
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
The... posters... who seek failure really should engage in a little so-called "intellectual honesty" of their own. This team was never bad enough to finish at the bottom of the league. You got your hopes up for no reason when the team went on an ungodly road losing streak that nobody should have expected could continue indefinitely.

Anyway, I'll now leave the floor to those who ruin every thread with their whining about how we won't get Jones or MacKinnon.


I don't agree with the bolded part at all. If this team had kept Iggy and made no trades at the deadline this team would be fighting for last spot. The veteran team sucked as bad if not worse than the veteran teams that are tanking now.

The biggest thing the young guys have shown is how badly the key veterans, ie Iggy, Tanguay , Glencross ect were at floating.

I am glad Iggy is gone and i hope Tanguay goes also.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2013, 08:38 PM   #132
freakinsaprikin
Scoring Winger
 
freakinsaprikin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: section 219
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogbert View Post
The posters who can't stop harping on how awful it is that we're winning games need to be specific about what it is they want the team to do in order for that to happen.

The Flames played a more-talented team that needed the win. They started the backup; had next to none of their key players in the lineup; and gave a bunch of rookies and AHLers all the ice time they could want, including 25 minutes to a defenseman playing his first NHL game. They won anyway. What more could they do not to win the game? Tell the players to score on their own net?
Yah I'm not sure what people are arguing about here? The Flames have made every attempt to tank here. Not sure you can really blame the young guys for trying to make a name for themselves and the vets for playing with some pride.

I'm sure everyone of us would love to be in a position to draft in the top 3, but sh** happens!
freakinsaprikin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freakinsaprikin For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2013, 08:38 PM   #133
edn88
#1 Goaltender
 
edn88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If you really wanted to tank it, you could do it by playing Babs 30 minutes a night...

Maybe the bright side is if this is all an illusion, that a bunch of AHLers who couldn't make their own playoffs are actually good enough to get the Flames to the promised land, that maybe we get the other wonderkid that is supposed to be in next years draft.

Sure would have been nice to have had Seth Jones or one of the other top 3 draft picks, but if not I hope we are able to add the right free-agent pieces, and move on to respectability.
__________________
GO FLAMES GO
edn88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:39 PM   #134
krynski
First Line Centre
 
krynski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
Keep Comeau, keep playing our lazy overpaid vets (Babchuk, Tanguay - why did you get injured, Glencross - see Tanguay, etc etc)

Yay another win. Get on a hot streak after we are eliminated from the playoffs - isnīt that the story as a Flames fan for the most part of the last 15 years? Have to laugh at the condecending posters who look down on people who want a higher pick - they are fans like how Darryl Sutter GMed, just win the next game. Not that Im going to say to lose on purpose, but its funny to they think its some sort of sign that we are gonna be awesome next year. Did you gets get fooled for the better part of the past 15 years too? Anyways, it is what it is - players are taught to compete, and as a Flames fan, you should know we are at our best when there is nothing to lose and we are out of the playoffs.
Tell me. How is this team similar to any team in years past? Who are the veterans?

If you were a kid, would you not want to showcase your sh** at the NHL level? Go ahead, blame the poor kids. The majority of players on this team are competing for a roster spot.

Not to mention the huge pay increases the kids get for playing at the NHL level...
krynski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:39 PM   #135
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krynski View Post
I prefer the long-term sustainability route. Good standings +good trades+ good development + good scouting = consistent cup contender, with developing replacing maturing talent
Everyone would prefer that, but that's not a choice unless you have ownership and management that is significantly smarter than everyone else. And even then, the structures in the league that are designed to pull you back to mediocrity might be enough to make the magnitude of "smartness advantage" you'd need to pull it off unobtainable.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:39 PM   #136
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogbert View Post
The posters who can't stop harping on how awful it is that we're winning games need to be specific about what it is they want the team to do in order for that to happen.

The Flames played a more-talented team that needed the win. They started the backup; had next to none of their key players in the lineup; and gave a bunch of rookies and AHLers all the ice time they could want, including 25 minutes to a defenseman playing his first NHL game. They won anyway. What more could they do not to win the game? Tell the players to score on their own net?
It tells you a little something about the NHL team the GM (Feaster) tries to assemble, does it not? When for the 2nd year in a row, it is our minor league team that gets us the above 0.500 and our NHL is one of the worst in the league, full of big fat contracts and NTC/NMC.

Oh and to answer your question... keep Comeau?
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:39 PM   #137
edn88
#1 Goaltender
 
edn88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I wonder if the Hurricanes, Preds etc that are in a free fall are trying to tank, or if they are just not that good.
__________________
GO FLAMES GO
edn88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:41 PM   #138
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogbert View Post
The posters who can't stop harping on how awful it is that we're winning games need to be specific about what it is they want the team to do in order to lose.

The Flames played a more-talented team that needed the win. They started the backup; had next to none of their key players in the lineup; and gave a bunch of rookies and AHLers all the ice time they could want, including 25 minutes to a defenseman playing his first NHL game. They won anyway. What more could they do not to win the game? Tell the players to score on their own net?
This is how i look at it as well. The Wild, Ducks and Wings should have beaten us. All three of them have superior rosters and yet they couldn't get the two points. If anyone should be mad it's should be those teams. You can't blame a young roster guys for going out their and trying.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:41 PM   #139
krynski
First Line Centre
 
krynski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Everyone would prefer that, but that's not a choice unless you have ownership and management that is significantly smarter than everyone else. And even then, the structures in the league that are designed to pull you back to mediocrity might be enough to make the magnitude of "smartness advantage" you'd need to pull it off unobtainable.
Some teams do it, so is it really unattainable?

Maybe for the Oil if you never fire KLowe...
krynski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2013, 08:41 PM   #140
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
Keep Comeau, keep playing our lazy overpaid vets (Babchuk, Tanguay - why did you get injured, Glencross - see Tanguay, etc etc)

Yay another win. Get on a hot streak after we are eliminated from the playoffs - isnīt that the story as a Flames fan for the most part of the last 15 years? Have to laugh at the condecending posters who look down on people who want a higher pick - they are fans like how Darryl Sutter GMed, just win the next game. Not that Im going to say to lose on purpose, but its funny to they think its some sort of sign that we are gonna be awesome next year. Did you gets get fooled for the better part of the past 15 years too? Anyways, it is what it is - players are taught to compete, and as a Flames fan, you should know we are at our best when there is nothing to lose and we are out of the playoffs.
Has one single person on this site said we're gonna be awesome next year? Is that what you're saying? I've yet to see that post, if so.
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sun For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy